Bring Lua to 5.4.6. (#1214)

This essentially re-does the work of #875 on top of master.

This is what I did to check that Cosmo's Lua extensions still worked:

```
$ build/bootstrap/make MODE=aarch64 o/aarch64/third_party/lua/lua
$ ape o/aarch64/third_party/lua/lua
>: 10
10
>: 010
8
>: 0b10
2
>: string.byte("\e")
27
>: "Hello, %s" % {"world"}
Hello, world
>: "*" * 3
***
```

`luaL_traceback2` was used to show the stack trace with parameter
values; it's used in `LuaCallWithTrace`, which is used in Redbean to run
Lua code. You should be able to see the extended stack trace by running
something like this: `redbean -e "function a(b)c()end a(2)"` (with
"params" indicating the extended stack trace):

```
stack traceback:
 [string "function a(b)c()end a(2)"]:1: in function 'a', params: b = 2;
 [string "function a(b)c()end a(2)"]:1: in main chunk
```
@pkulchenko confirmed that I get the expected result with the updated
code.

This is what I did to check that Lua itself still worked:

```
$ cd third_party/lua/test/
$ ape ../../../o/aarch64/third_party/lua/lua all.lua
```

There's one test failure, in `files.lua`:

```
***** FILE 'files.lua'*****
testing i/o
../../../o/aarch64/third_party/lua/lua: files.lua:84: assertion failed!
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'assert'
files.lua:84: in main chunk
(...tail calls...)
all.lua:195: in main chunk
[C]: in ?
.>>> closing state <<<
```

That isn't a result of these changes; the same test is failing in
master.

The failure is here:

```lua
if not _port then   -- invalid seek
  local status, msg, code = io.stdin:seek("set", 1000)
  assert(not status and type(msg) == "string" and type(code) == "number")
end
```

The test expects a seek to offset 1,000 on stdin to fail — but it
doesn't. `status` ends up being the new offset rather than `nil`.

If I comment out that one test, the remaining tests succeed.

third_party/lua/test/code.lua

@@ -69,10 +69,24 @@ foo = function (f, a)
 checkKlist(foo, {100000, 100000.0, -100000, -100000.0})
 
 
+-- floats x integers
+foo = function (t, a)
+  t[a] = 1; t[a] = 1.0
+  t[a] = 1; t[a] = 1.0
+  t[a] = 2; t[a] = 2.0
+  t[a] = 0; t[a] = 0.0
+  t[a] = 1; t[a] = 1.0
+  t[a] = 2; t[a] = 2.0
+  t[a] = 0; t[a] = 0.0
+end
+
+checkKlist(foo, {1, 1.0, 2, 2.0, 0, 0.0})
+
+
 -- testing opcodes
 
 -- check that 'f' opcodes match '...'
-function check (f, ...)
+local function check (f, ...)
   local arg = {...}
   local c = T.listcode(f)
   for i=1, #arg do
@@ -85,7 +99,7 @@ end
 
 
 -- check that 'f' opcodes match '...' and that 'f(p) == r'.
-function checkR (f, p, r, ...)
+local function checkR (f, p, r, ...)
   local r1 = f(p)
   assert(r == r1 and math.type(r) == math.type(r1))
   check(f, ...)
@@ -93,7 +107,7 @@ end
 
 
 -- check that 'a' and 'b' has the same opcodes
-function checkequal (a, b)
+local function checkequal (a, b)
   a = T.listcode(a)
   b = T.listcode(b)
   assert(#a == #b)