Upgrade to 2022-era LLVM LIBCXX

third_party/libcxx/__algorithm/nth_element.h

@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP___ALGORITHM_NTH_ELEMENT_H
+#define _LIBCPP___ALGORITHM_NTH_ELEMENT_H
+
+#include <__algorithm/comp.h>
+#include <__algorithm/comp_ref_type.h>
+#include <__algorithm/iterator_operations.h>
+#include <__algorithm/sort.h>
+#include <__config>
+#include <__debug>
+#include <__debug_utils/randomize_range.h>
+#include <__iterator/iterator_traits.h>
+#include <__utility/move.h>
+
+#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER)
+#  pragma GCC system_header
+#endif
+
+_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
+
+template<class _Compare, class _RandomAccessIterator>
+_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 bool
+__nth_element_find_guard(_RandomAccessIterator& __i, _RandomAccessIterator& __j,
+                         _RandomAccessIterator __m, _Compare __comp)
+{
+    // manually guard downward moving __j against __i
+    while (true) {
+        if (__i == --__j) {
+            return false;
+        }
+        if (__comp(*__j, *__m)) {
+            return true;  // found guard for downward moving __j, now use unguarded partition
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+template <class _AlgPolicy, class _Compare, class _RandomAccessIterator>
+_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 void
+__nth_element(_RandomAccessIterator __first, _RandomAccessIterator __nth, _RandomAccessIterator __last, _Compare __comp)
+{
+    using _Ops = _IterOps<_AlgPolicy>;
+
+    // _Compare is known to be a reference type
+    typedef typename iterator_traits<_RandomAccessIterator>::difference_type difference_type;
+    const difference_type __limit = 7;
+    while (true)
+    {
+        if (__nth == __last)
+            return;
+        difference_type __len = __last - __first;
+        switch (__len)
+        {
+        case 0:
+        case 1:
+            return;
+        case 2:
+            if (__comp(*--__last, *__first))
+                _Ops::iter_swap(__first, __last);
+            return;
+        case 3:
+            {
+            _RandomAccessIterator __m = __first;
+            std::__sort3<_AlgPolicy, _Compare>(__first, ++__m, --__last, __comp);
+            return;
+            }
+        }
+        if (__len <= __limit)
+        {
+            std::__selection_sort<_AlgPolicy, _Compare>(__first, __last, __comp);
+            return;
+        }
+        // __len > __limit >= 3
+        _RandomAccessIterator __m = __first + __len/2;
+        _RandomAccessIterator __lm1 = __last;
+        unsigned __n_swaps = std::__sort3<_AlgPolicy, _Compare>(__first, __m, --__lm1, __comp);
+        // *__m is median
+        // partition [__first, __m) < *__m and *__m <= [__m, __last)
+        // (this inhibits tossing elements equivalent to __m around unnecessarily)
+        _RandomAccessIterator __i = __first;
+        _RandomAccessIterator __j = __lm1;
+        // j points beyond range to be tested, *__lm1 is known to be <= *__m
+        // The search going up is known to be guarded but the search coming down isn't.
+        // Prime the downward search with a guard.
+        if (!__comp(*__i, *__m))  // if *__first == *__m
+        {
+            // *__first == *__m, *__first doesn't go in first part
+            if (_VSTD::__nth_element_find_guard<_Compare>(__i, __j, __m, __comp)) {
+                _Ops::iter_swap(__i, __j);
+                ++__n_swaps;
+            } else {
+                // *__first == *__m, *__m <= all other elements
+                // Partition instead into [__first, __i) == *__first and *__first < [__i, __last)
+                ++__i;  // __first + 1
+                __j = __last;
+                if (!__comp(*__first, *--__j)) {  // we need a guard if *__first == *(__last-1)
+                    while (true) {
+                        if (__i == __j) {
+                            return;  // [__first, __last) all equivalent elements
+                        } else if (__comp(*__first, *__i)) {
+                            _Ops::iter_swap(__i, __j);
+                            ++__n_swaps;
+                            ++__i;
+                            break;
+                        }
+                        ++__i;
+                    }
+                }
+                // [__first, __i) == *__first and *__first < [__j, __last) and __j == __last - 1
+                if (__i == __j) {
+                    return;
+                }
+                while (true) {
+                    while (!__comp(*__first, *__i))
+                        ++__i;
+                    while (__comp(*__first, *--__j))
+                        ;
+                    if (__i >= __j)
+                        break;
+                    _Ops::iter_swap(__i, __j);
+                    ++__n_swaps;
+                    ++__i;
+                }
+                // [__first, __i) == *__first and *__first < [__i, __last)
+                // The first part is sorted,
+                if (__nth < __i) {
+                    return;
+                }
+                // __nth_element the second part
+                // _VSTD::__nth_element<_Compare>(__i, __nth, __last, __comp);
+                __first = __i;
+                continue;
+            }
+        }
+        ++__i;
+        // j points beyond range to be tested, *__lm1 is known to be <= *__m
+        // if not yet partitioned...
+        if (__i < __j)
+        {
+            // known that *(__i - 1) < *__m
+            while (true)
+            {
+                // __m still guards upward moving __i
+                while (__comp(*__i, *__m))
+                    ++__i;
+                // It is now known that a guard exists for downward moving __j
+                while (!__comp(*--__j, *__m))
+                    ;
+                if (__i >= __j)
+                    break;
+                _Ops::iter_swap(__i, __j);
+                ++__n_swaps;
+                // It is known that __m != __j
+                // If __m just moved, follow it
+                if (__m == __i)
+                    __m = __j;
+                ++__i;
+            }
+        }
+        // [__first, __i) < *__m and *__m <= [__i, __last)
+        if (__i != __m && __comp(*__m, *__i))
+        {
+            _Ops::iter_swap(__i, __m);
+            ++__n_swaps;
+        }
+        // [__first, __i) < *__i and *__i <= [__i+1, __last)
+        if (__nth == __i)
+            return;
+        if (__n_swaps == 0)
+        {
+            // We were given a perfectly partitioned sequence.  Coincidence?
+            if (__nth < __i)
+            {
+                // Check for [__first, __i) already sorted
+                __j = __m = __first;
+                while (true) {
+                    if (++__j == __i) {
+                        // [__first, __i) sorted
+                        return;
+                    }
+                    if (__comp(*__j, *__m)) {
+                        // not yet sorted, so sort
+                        break;
+                    }
+                    __m = __j;
+                }
+            }
+            else
+            {
+                // Check for [__i, __last) already sorted
+                __j = __m = __i;
+                while (true) {
+                    if (++__j == __last) {
+                        // [__i, __last) sorted
+                        return;
+                    }
+                    if (__comp(*__j, *__m)) {
+                        // not yet sorted, so sort
+                        break;
+                    }
+                    __m = __j;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        // __nth_element on range containing __nth
+        if (__nth < __i)
+        {
+            // _VSTD::__nth_element<_Compare>(__first, __nth, __i, __comp);
+            __last = __i;
+        }
+        else
+        {
+            // _VSTD::__nth_element<_Compare>(__i+1, __nth, __last, __comp);
+            __first = ++__i;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+template <class _AlgPolicy, class _RandomAccessIterator, class _Compare>
+inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20
+void __nth_element_impl(_RandomAccessIterator __first, _RandomAccessIterator __nth, _RandomAccessIterator __last,
+                        _Compare& __comp) {
+  if (__nth == __last)
+    return;
+
+  std::__debug_randomize_range<_AlgPolicy>(__first, __last);
+
+  std::__nth_element<_AlgPolicy, __comp_ref_type<_Compare> >(__first, __nth, __last, __comp);
+
+  std::__debug_randomize_range<_AlgPolicy>(__first, __nth);
+  if (__nth != __last) {
+    std::__debug_randomize_range<_AlgPolicy>(++__nth, __last);
+  }
+}
+
+template <class _RandomAccessIterator, class _Compare>
+inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20
+void nth_element(_RandomAccessIterator __first, _RandomAccessIterator __nth, _RandomAccessIterator __last,
+                 _Compare __comp) {
+  std::__nth_element_impl<_ClassicAlgPolicy>(std::move(__first), std::move(__nth), std::move(__last), __comp);
+}
+
+template <class _RandomAccessIterator>
+inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20
+void nth_element(_RandomAccessIterator __first, _RandomAccessIterator __nth, _RandomAccessIterator __last) {
+  std::nth_element(std::move(__first), std::move(__nth), std::move(__last), __less<typename
+      iterator_traits<_RandomAccessIterator>::value_type>());
+}
+
+_LIBCPP_END_NAMESPACE_STD
+
+#endif // _LIBCPP___ALGORITHM_NTH_ELEMENT_H