This change fixes Cosmopolitan so it has fewer opinions about compiler
warnings. The whole repository had to be cleaned up to be buildable in
-Werror -Wall mode. This lets us benefit from things like strict const
checking. Some actual bugs might have been caught too.
One of the disadvantages of x25519 and ℘256 is it only provides 126 bits
of security, so that seems like a weak link in the chain, if we're using
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384. The U.S. government wants classified data
to be encrypted using a curve at least as strong as ℘384, which provides
192 bits of security, but if you read the consensus of stack exchange it
would give you the impression that ℘384 is three times slower.
This change (as well as the previous one) makes ℘384 three times as fast
by tuning its modulus and multiplication subroutines with new tests that
should convincingly show: the optimized code behaves the same way as the
old code. Some of the diff noise from the previous change is now removed
too, so that our vendored fork can be more easily compared with upstream
sources. So you can now have stronger cryptography without compromises.
℘384 modulus Justine l: 28𝑐 9𝑛𝑠
℘384 modulus MbedTLS NIST l: 127𝑐 41𝑛𝑠
℘384 modulus MbedTLS MPI l: 1,850𝑐 597𝑛𝑠
The benchmarks above show the improvements made by secp384r1() which is
an important function since it needs to be called 13,000 times whenever
someone establishes a connection to your web server. The same's true of
Mul6x6Adx() which is able to multiply 384-bit numbers in 73 cycles, but
only if your CPU was purchased after 2014 when Broadwell was introduced
This change makes SSL virtual hosting possible. You can now load
multiple certificates for multiple domains and redbean will just
figure out which one to use, even if you only have 1 ip address.
You can also use a jumbo certificate that lists all your domains
in the the subject alternative names.
This change also makes performance improvements to MbedTLS. Here
are some benchmarks vs. cc1920749e
BEFORE AFTER (microsecs)
suite_ssl.com 2512881 191738 13.11x faster
suite_pkparse.com 36291 3295 11.01x faster
suite_x509parse.com 854669 120293 7.10x faster
suite_pkwrite.com 6549 1265 5.18x faster
suite_ecdsa.com 53347 18778 2.84x faster
suite_pk.com 49051 18717 2.62x faster
suite_ecdh.com 19535 9502 2.06x faster
suite_shax.com 15848 7965 1.99x faster
suite_rsa.com 353257 184828 1.91x faster
suite_x509write.com 162646 85733 1.90x faster
suite_ecp.com 20503 11050 1.86x faster
suite_hmac_drbg.no_reseed.com 19528 11417 1.71x faster
suite_hmac_drbg.nopr.com 12460 8010 1.56x faster
suite_mpi.com 687124 442661 1.55x faster
suite_hmac_drbg.pr.com 11890 7752 1.53x faster
There aren't any special tricks to the performance imporvements.
It's mostly due to code cleanup, assembly and intel instructions
like mulx, adox, and adcx.
