linux-stable/net/dsa/tag_8021q.c

590 lines
17 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright (c) 2019, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
*
* This module is not a complete tagger implementation. It only provides
* primitives for taggers that rely on 802.1Q VLAN tags to use. The
* dsa_8021q_netdev_ops is registered for API compliance and not used
* directly by callers.
*/
#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
net: dsa: sja1105: implement cross-chip bridging operations sja1105 uses dsa_8021q for DSA tagging, a format which is VLAN at heart and which is compatible with cascading. A complete description of this tagging format is in net/dsa/tag_8021q.c, but a quick summary is that each external-facing port tags incoming frames with a unique pvid, and this special VLAN is transmitted as tagged towards the inside of the system, and as untagged towards the exterior. The tag encodes the switch id and the source port index. This means that cross-chip bridging for dsa_8021q only entails adding the dsa_8021q pvids of one switch to the RX filter of the other switches. Everything else falls naturally into place, as long as the bottom-end of ports (the leaves in the tree) is comprised exclusively of dsa_8021q-compatible (i.e. sja1105 switches). Otherwise, there would be a chance that a front-panel switch transmits a packet tagged with a dsa_8021q header, header which it wouldn't be able to remove, and which would hence "leak" out. The only use case I tested (due to lack of board availability) was when the sja1105 switches are part of disjoint trees (however, this doesn't change the fact that multiple sja1105 switches still need unique switch identifiers in such a system). But in principle, even "true" single-tree setups (with DSA links) should work just as fine, except for a small change which I can't test: dsa_towards_port should be used instead of dsa_upstream_port (I made the assumption that the routing port that any sja1105 should use towards its neighbours is the CPU port. That might not hold true in other setups). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-05-10 16:37:43 +00:00
#include <linux/dsa/8021q.h>
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
#include "dsa_priv.h"
/* Binary structure of the fake 12-bit VID field (when the TPID is
* ETH_P_DSA_8021Q):
*
* | 11 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
* +-----------+-----+-----------------+-----------+-----------------------+
net: dsa: sja1105: add bridge TX data plane offload based on tag_8021q The main desire for having this feature in sja1105 is to support network stack termination for traffic coming from a VLAN-aware bridge. For sja1105, offloading the bridge data plane means sending packets as-is, with the proper VLAN tag, to the chip. The chip will look up its FDB and forward them to the correct destination port. But we support bridge data plane offload even for VLAN-unaware bridges, and the implementation there is different. In fact, VLAN-unaware bridging is governed by tag_8021q, so it makes sense to have the .bridge_fwd_offload_add() implementation fully within tag_8021q. The key difference is that we only support 1 VLAN-aware bridge, but we support multiple VLAN-unaware bridges. So we need to make sure that the forwarding domain is not crossed by packets injected from the stack. For this, we introduce the concept of a tag_8021q TX VLAN for bridge forwarding offload. As opposed to the regular TX VLANs which contain only 2 ports (the user port and the CPU port), a bridge data plane TX VLAN is "multicast" (or "imprecise"): it contains all the ports that are part of a certain bridge, and the hardware will select where the packet goes within this "imprecise" forwarding domain. Each VLAN-unaware bridge has its own "imprecise" TX VLAN, so we make use of the unique "bridge_num" provided by DSA for the data plane offload. We use the same 3 bits from the tag_8021q VLAN ID format to encode this bridge number. Note that these 3 bit positions have been used before for sub-VLANs in best-effort VLAN filtering mode. The difference is that for best-effort, the sub-VLANs were only valid on RX (and it was documented that the sub-VLAN field needed to be transmitted as zero). Whereas for the bridge data plane offload, these 3 bits are only valid on TX. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-26 16:55:35 +00:00
* | DIR | VBID| SWITCH_ID | VBID | PORT |
* +-----------+-----+-----------------+-----------+-----------------------+
*
* DIR - VID[11:10]:
* Direction flags.
* * 1 (0b01) for RX VLAN,
* * 2 (0b10) for TX VLAN.
* These values make the special VIDs of 0, 1 and 4095 to be left
* unused by this coding scheme.
*
* SWITCH_ID - VID[8:6]:
* Index of switch within DSA tree. Must be between 0 and 7.
*
net: dsa: sja1105: add bridge TX data plane offload based on tag_8021q The main desire for having this feature in sja1105 is to support network stack termination for traffic coming from a VLAN-aware bridge. For sja1105, offloading the bridge data plane means sending packets as-is, with the proper VLAN tag, to the chip. The chip will look up its FDB and forward them to the correct destination port. But we support bridge data plane offload even for VLAN-unaware bridges, and the implementation there is different. In fact, VLAN-unaware bridging is governed by tag_8021q, so it makes sense to have the .bridge_fwd_offload_add() implementation fully within tag_8021q. The key difference is that we only support 1 VLAN-aware bridge, but we support multiple VLAN-unaware bridges. So we need to make sure that the forwarding domain is not crossed by packets injected from the stack. For this, we introduce the concept of a tag_8021q TX VLAN for bridge forwarding offload. As opposed to the regular TX VLANs which contain only 2 ports (the user port and the CPU port), a bridge data plane TX VLAN is "multicast" (or "imprecise"): it contains all the ports that are part of a certain bridge, and the hardware will select where the packet goes within this "imprecise" forwarding domain. Each VLAN-unaware bridge has its own "imprecise" TX VLAN, so we make use of the unique "bridge_num" provided by DSA for the data plane offload. We use the same 3 bits from the tag_8021q VLAN ID format to encode this bridge number. Note that these 3 bit positions have been used before for sub-VLANs in best-effort VLAN filtering mode. The difference is that for best-effort, the sub-VLANs were only valid on RX (and it was documented that the sub-VLAN field needed to be transmitted as zero). Whereas for the bridge data plane offload, these 3 bits are only valid on TX. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-26 16:55:35 +00:00
* VBID - { VID[9], VID[5:4] }:
* Virtual bridge ID. If between 1 and 7, packet targets the broadcast
* domain of a bridge. If transmitted as zero, packet targets a single
* port.
net: dsa: sja1105: delete the best_effort_vlan_filtering mode Simply put, the best-effort VLAN filtering mode relied on VLAN retagging from a bridge VLAN towards a tag_8021q sub-VLAN in order to be able to decode the source port in the tagger, but the VLAN retagging implementation inside the sja1105 chips is not the best and we were relying on marginal operating conditions. The most notable limitation of the best-effort VLAN filtering mode is its incapacity to treat this case properly: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set swp2 master br0 ip link set swp4 master br0 bridge vlan del dev swp4 vid 1 bridge vlan add dev swp4 vid 1 pvid When sending an untagged packet through swp2, the expectation is for it to be forwarded to swp4 as egress-tagged (so it will contain VLAN ID 1 on egress). But the switch will send it as egress-untagged. There was an attempt to fix this here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210407201452.1703261-2-olteanv@gmail.com/ but it failed miserably because it broke PTP RX timestamping, in a way that cannot be corrected due to hardware issues related to VLAN retagging. So with either PTP broken or pushing VLAN headers on egress for untagged packets being broken, the sad reality is that the best-effort VLAN filtering code is broken. Delete it. Note that this means there will be a temporary loss of functionality in this driver until it is replaced with something better (network stack RX/TX capability for "mode 2" as described in Documentation/networking/dsa/sja1105.rst, the "port under VLAN-aware bridge" case). We simply cannot keep this code until that driver rework is done, it is super bloated and tangled with tag_8021q. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:42 +00:00
*
* PORT - VID[3:0]:
* Index of switch port. Must be between 0 and 15.
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
*/
#define DSA_8021Q_DIR_SHIFT 10
#define DSA_8021Q_DIR_MASK GENMASK(11, 10)
#define DSA_8021Q_DIR(x) (((x) << DSA_8021Q_DIR_SHIFT) & \
DSA_8021Q_DIR_MASK)
#define DSA_8021Q_DIR_RX DSA_8021Q_DIR(1)
#define DSA_8021Q_DIR_TX DSA_8021Q_DIR(2)
#define DSA_8021Q_SWITCH_ID_SHIFT 6
#define DSA_8021Q_SWITCH_ID_MASK GENMASK(8, 6)
#define DSA_8021Q_SWITCH_ID(x) (((x) << DSA_8021Q_SWITCH_ID_SHIFT) & \
DSA_8021Q_SWITCH_ID_MASK)
net: dsa: sja1105: add bridge TX data plane offload based on tag_8021q The main desire for having this feature in sja1105 is to support network stack termination for traffic coming from a VLAN-aware bridge. For sja1105, offloading the bridge data plane means sending packets as-is, with the proper VLAN tag, to the chip. The chip will look up its FDB and forward them to the correct destination port. But we support bridge data plane offload even for VLAN-unaware bridges, and the implementation there is different. In fact, VLAN-unaware bridging is governed by tag_8021q, so it makes sense to have the .bridge_fwd_offload_add() implementation fully within tag_8021q. The key difference is that we only support 1 VLAN-aware bridge, but we support multiple VLAN-unaware bridges. So we need to make sure that the forwarding domain is not crossed by packets injected from the stack. For this, we introduce the concept of a tag_8021q TX VLAN for bridge forwarding offload. As opposed to the regular TX VLANs which contain only 2 ports (the user port and the CPU port), a bridge data plane TX VLAN is "multicast" (or "imprecise"): it contains all the ports that are part of a certain bridge, and the hardware will select where the packet goes within this "imprecise" forwarding domain. Each VLAN-unaware bridge has its own "imprecise" TX VLAN, so we make use of the unique "bridge_num" provided by DSA for the data plane offload. We use the same 3 bits from the tag_8021q VLAN ID format to encode this bridge number. Note that these 3 bit positions have been used before for sub-VLANs in best-effort VLAN filtering mode. The difference is that for best-effort, the sub-VLANs were only valid on RX (and it was documented that the sub-VLAN field needed to be transmitted as zero). Whereas for the bridge data plane offload, these 3 bits are only valid on TX. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-26 16:55:35 +00:00
#define DSA_8021Q_VBID_HI_SHIFT 9
#define DSA_8021Q_VBID_HI_MASK GENMASK(9, 9)
#define DSA_8021Q_VBID_LO_SHIFT 4
#define DSA_8021Q_VBID_LO_MASK GENMASK(5, 4)
#define DSA_8021Q_VBID_HI(x) (((x) & GENMASK(2, 2)) >> 2)
#define DSA_8021Q_VBID_LO(x) ((x) & GENMASK(1, 0))
#define DSA_8021Q_VBID(x) \
(((DSA_8021Q_VBID_LO(x) << DSA_8021Q_VBID_LO_SHIFT) & \
DSA_8021Q_VBID_LO_MASK) | \
((DSA_8021Q_VBID_HI(x) << DSA_8021Q_VBID_HI_SHIFT) & \
DSA_8021Q_VBID_HI_MASK))
#define DSA_8021Q_PORT_SHIFT 0
#define DSA_8021Q_PORT_MASK GENMASK(3, 0)
#define DSA_8021Q_PORT(x) (((x) << DSA_8021Q_PORT_SHIFT) & \
DSA_8021Q_PORT_MASK)
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
u16 dsa_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_offload_vid(unsigned int bridge_num)
net: dsa: sja1105: add bridge TX data plane offload based on tag_8021q The main desire for having this feature in sja1105 is to support network stack termination for traffic coming from a VLAN-aware bridge. For sja1105, offloading the bridge data plane means sending packets as-is, with the proper VLAN tag, to the chip. The chip will look up its FDB and forward them to the correct destination port. But we support bridge data plane offload even for VLAN-unaware bridges, and the implementation there is different. In fact, VLAN-unaware bridging is governed by tag_8021q, so it makes sense to have the .bridge_fwd_offload_add() implementation fully within tag_8021q. The key difference is that we only support 1 VLAN-aware bridge, but we support multiple VLAN-unaware bridges. So we need to make sure that the forwarding domain is not crossed by packets injected from the stack. For this, we introduce the concept of a tag_8021q TX VLAN for bridge forwarding offload. As opposed to the regular TX VLANs which contain only 2 ports (the user port and the CPU port), a bridge data plane TX VLAN is "multicast" (or "imprecise"): it contains all the ports that are part of a certain bridge, and the hardware will select where the packet goes within this "imprecise" forwarding domain. Each VLAN-unaware bridge has its own "imprecise" TX VLAN, so we make use of the unique "bridge_num" provided by DSA for the data plane offload. We use the same 3 bits from the tag_8021q VLAN ID format to encode this bridge number. Note that these 3 bit positions have been used before for sub-VLANs in best-effort VLAN filtering mode. The difference is that for best-effort, the sub-VLANs were only valid on RX (and it was documented that the sub-VLAN field needed to be transmitted as zero). Whereas for the bridge data plane offload, these 3 bits are only valid on TX. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-26 16:55:35 +00:00
{
/* The VBID value of 0 is reserved for precise TX, but it is also
* reserved/invalid for the bridge_num, so all is well.
*/
return DSA_8021Q_DIR_TX | DSA_8021Q_VBID(bridge_num);
net: dsa: sja1105: add bridge TX data plane offload based on tag_8021q The main desire for having this feature in sja1105 is to support network stack termination for traffic coming from a VLAN-aware bridge. For sja1105, offloading the bridge data plane means sending packets as-is, with the proper VLAN tag, to the chip. The chip will look up its FDB and forward them to the correct destination port. But we support bridge data plane offload even for VLAN-unaware bridges, and the implementation there is different. In fact, VLAN-unaware bridging is governed by tag_8021q, so it makes sense to have the .bridge_fwd_offload_add() implementation fully within tag_8021q. The key difference is that we only support 1 VLAN-aware bridge, but we support multiple VLAN-unaware bridges. So we need to make sure that the forwarding domain is not crossed by packets injected from the stack. For this, we introduce the concept of a tag_8021q TX VLAN for bridge forwarding offload. As opposed to the regular TX VLANs which contain only 2 ports (the user port and the CPU port), a bridge data plane TX VLAN is "multicast" (or "imprecise"): it contains all the ports that are part of a certain bridge, and the hardware will select where the packet goes within this "imprecise" forwarding domain. Each VLAN-unaware bridge has its own "imprecise" TX VLAN, so we make use of the unique "bridge_num" provided by DSA for the data plane offload. We use the same 3 bits from the tag_8021q VLAN ID format to encode this bridge number. Note that these 3 bit positions have been used before for sub-VLANs in best-effort VLAN filtering mode. The difference is that for best-effort, the sub-VLANs were only valid on RX (and it was documented that the sub-VLAN field needed to be transmitted as zero). Whereas for the bridge data plane offload, these 3 bits are only valid on TX. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-26 16:55:35 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_offload_vid);
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
/* Returns the VID to be inserted into the frame from xmit for switch steering
* instructions on egress. Encodes switch ID and port ID.
*/
u16 dsa_tag_8021q_tx_vid(const struct dsa_port *dp)
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
{
return DSA_8021Q_DIR_TX | DSA_8021Q_SWITCH_ID(dp->ds->index) |
DSA_8021Q_PORT(dp->index);
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_tag_8021q_tx_vid);
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
/* Returns the VID that will be installed as pvid for this switch port, sent as
* tagged egress towards the CPU port and decoded by the rcv function.
*/
u16 dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vid(const struct dsa_port *dp)
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
{
return DSA_8021Q_DIR_RX | DSA_8021Q_SWITCH_ID(dp->ds->index) |
DSA_8021Q_PORT(dp->index);
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vid);
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
/* Returns the decoded switch ID from the RX VID. */
int dsa_8021q_rx_switch_id(u16 vid)
{
return (vid & DSA_8021Q_SWITCH_ID_MASK) >> DSA_8021Q_SWITCH_ID_SHIFT;
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_8021q_rx_switch_id);
/* Returns the decoded port ID from the RX VID. */
int dsa_8021q_rx_source_port(u16 vid)
{
return (vid & DSA_8021Q_PORT_MASK) >> DSA_8021Q_PORT_SHIFT;
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_8021q_rx_source_port);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
/* Returns the decoded VBID from the RX VID. */
static int dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vbid(u16 vid)
{
u16 vbid_hi = (vid & DSA_8021Q_VBID_HI_MASK) >> DSA_8021Q_VBID_HI_SHIFT;
u16 vbid_lo = (vid & DSA_8021Q_VBID_LO_MASK) >> DSA_8021Q_VBID_LO_SHIFT;
return (vbid_hi << 2) | vbid_lo;
}
bool vid_is_dsa_8021q_rxvlan(u16 vid)
{
return (vid & DSA_8021Q_DIR_MASK) == DSA_8021Q_DIR_RX;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vid_is_dsa_8021q_rxvlan);
bool vid_is_dsa_8021q_txvlan(u16 vid)
{
return (vid & DSA_8021Q_DIR_MASK) == DSA_8021Q_DIR_TX;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vid_is_dsa_8021q_txvlan);
bool vid_is_dsa_8021q(u16 vid)
{
return vid_is_dsa_8021q_rxvlan(vid) || vid_is_dsa_8021q_txvlan(vid);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vid_is_dsa_8021q);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
static struct dsa_tag_8021q_vlan *
dsa_tag_8021q_vlan_find(struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx, int port, u16 vid)
{
struct dsa_tag_8021q_vlan *v;
list_for_each_entry(v, &ctx->vlans, list)
if (v->vid == vid && v->port == port)
return v;
return NULL;
}
static int dsa_port_do_tag_8021q_vlan_add(struct dsa_port *dp, u16 vid,
u16 flags)
net: dsa: tag_8021q: Restore bridge VLANs when enabling vlan_filtering The bridge core assumes that enabling/disabling vlan_filtering will translate into the simple toggling of a flag for switchdev drivers. That is clearly not the case for sja1105, which alters the VLAN table and the pvids in order to obtain port separation in standalone mode. There are 2 parts to the issue. First, tag_8021q changes the pvid to a unique per-port rx_vid for frame identification. But we need to disable tag_8021q when vlan_filtering kicks in, and at that point, the VLAN configured as pvid will have to be removed from the filtering table of the ports. With an invalid pvid, the ports will drop all traffic. Since the bridge will not call any vlan operation through switchdev after enabling vlan_filtering, we need to ensure we're in a functional state ourselves. Hence read the pvid that the bridge is aware of, and program that into our ports. Secondly, tag_8021q uses the 1024-3071 range privately in vlan_filtering=0 mode. Had the user installed one of these VLANs during a previous vlan_filtering=1 session, then upon the next tag_8021q cleanup for vlan_filtering to kick in again, VLANs in that range will get deleted unconditionally, hence breaking user expectation. So when deleting the VLANs, check if the bridge had knowledge about them, and if it did, re-apply the settings. Wrap this logic inside a dsa_8021q_vid_apply helper function to reduce code duplication. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-30 00:53:25 +00:00
{
struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx = dp->ds->tag_8021q_ctx;
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
struct dsa_tag_8021q_vlan *v;
int port = dp->index;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
int err;
/* No need to bother with refcounting for user ports */
if (!(dsa_port_is_cpu(dp) || dsa_port_is_dsa(dp)))
return ds->ops->tag_8021q_vlan_add(ds, port, vid, flags);
v = dsa_tag_8021q_vlan_find(ctx, port, vid);
if (v) {
refcount_inc(&v->refcount);
return 0;
}
v = kzalloc(sizeof(*v), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!v)
return -ENOMEM;
err = ds->ops->tag_8021q_vlan_add(ds, port, vid, flags);
if (err) {
kfree(v);
return err;
}
v->vid = vid;
v->port = port;
refcount_set(&v->refcount, 1);
list_add_tail(&v->list, &ctx->vlans);
return 0;
}
static int dsa_port_do_tag_8021q_vlan_del(struct dsa_port *dp, u16 vid)
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
{
struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx = dp->ds->tag_8021q_ctx;
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
struct dsa_tag_8021q_vlan *v;
int port = dp->index;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
int err;
/* No need to bother with refcounting for user ports */
if (!(dsa_port_is_cpu(dp) || dsa_port_is_dsa(dp)))
return ds->ops->tag_8021q_vlan_del(ds, port, vid);
v = dsa_tag_8021q_vlan_find(ctx, port, vid);
if (!v)
return -ENOENT;
if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&v->refcount))
return 0;
err = ds->ops->tag_8021q_vlan_del(ds, port, vid);
if (err) {
refcount_inc(&v->refcount);
return err;
}
list_del(&v->list);
kfree(v);
return 0;
}
net: dsa: tag_8021q: Restore bridge VLANs when enabling vlan_filtering The bridge core assumes that enabling/disabling vlan_filtering will translate into the simple toggling of a flag for switchdev drivers. That is clearly not the case for sja1105, which alters the VLAN table and the pvids in order to obtain port separation in standalone mode. There are 2 parts to the issue. First, tag_8021q changes the pvid to a unique per-port rx_vid for frame identification. But we need to disable tag_8021q when vlan_filtering kicks in, and at that point, the VLAN configured as pvid will have to be removed from the filtering table of the ports. With an invalid pvid, the ports will drop all traffic. Since the bridge will not call any vlan operation through switchdev after enabling vlan_filtering, we need to ensure we're in a functional state ourselves. Hence read the pvid that the bridge is aware of, and program that into our ports. Secondly, tag_8021q uses the 1024-3071 range privately in vlan_filtering=0 mode. Had the user installed one of these VLANs during a previous vlan_filtering=1 session, then upon the next tag_8021q cleanup for vlan_filtering to kick in again, VLANs in that range will get deleted unconditionally, hence breaking user expectation. So when deleting the VLANs, check if the bridge had knowledge about them, and if it did, re-apply the settings. Wrap this logic inside a dsa_8021q_vid_apply helper function to reduce code duplication. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-30 00:53:25 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
static bool
dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_match(struct dsa_port *dp,
struct dsa_notifier_tag_8021q_vlan_info *info)
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
{
struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
if (dsa_port_is_dsa(dp) || dsa_port_is_cpu(dp))
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
return true;
if (ds->dst->index == info->tree_index && ds->index == info->sw_index)
return dp->index == info->port;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
return false;
}
int dsa_switch_tag_8021q_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds,
struct dsa_notifier_tag_8021q_vlan_info *info)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
int err;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
/* Since we use dsa_broadcast(), there might be other switches in other
* trees which don't support tag_8021q, so don't return an error.
* Or they might even support tag_8021q but have not registered yet to
* use it (maybe they use another tagger currently).
*/
if (!ds->ops->tag_8021q_vlan_add || !ds->tag_8021q_ctx)
return 0;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: Restore bridge VLANs when enabling vlan_filtering The bridge core assumes that enabling/disabling vlan_filtering will translate into the simple toggling of a flag for switchdev drivers. That is clearly not the case for sja1105, which alters the VLAN table and the pvids in order to obtain port separation in standalone mode. There are 2 parts to the issue. First, tag_8021q changes the pvid to a unique per-port rx_vid for frame identification. But we need to disable tag_8021q when vlan_filtering kicks in, and at that point, the VLAN configured as pvid will have to be removed from the filtering table of the ports. With an invalid pvid, the ports will drop all traffic. Since the bridge will not call any vlan operation through switchdev after enabling vlan_filtering, we need to ensure we're in a functional state ourselves. Hence read the pvid that the bridge is aware of, and program that into our ports. Secondly, tag_8021q uses the 1024-3071 range privately in vlan_filtering=0 mode. Had the user installed one of these VLANs during a previous vlan_filtering=1 session, then upon the next tag_8021q cleanup for vlan_filtering to kick in again, VLANs in that range will get deleted unconditionally, hence breaking user expectation. So when deleting the VLANs, check if the bridge had knowledge about them, and if it did, re-apply the settings. Wrap this logic inside a dsa_8021q_vid_apply helper function to reduce code duplication. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-30 00:53:25 +00:00
dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, ds) {
if (dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_match(dp, info)) {
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
u16 flags = 0;
if (dsa_port_is_user(dp))
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
flags |= BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_UNTAGGED;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
/* Standalone VLANs are PVIDs */
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
if (vid_is_dsa_8021q_rxvlan(info->vid) &&
dsa_8021q_rx_switch_id(info->vid) == ds->index &&
dsa_8021q_rx_source_port(info->vid) == dp->index)
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
flags |= BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
/* And bridging VLANs are PVIDs too on user ports */
if (dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vbid(info->vid) &&
dsa_port_is_user(dp))
flags |= BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID;
err = dsa_port_do_tag_8021q_vlan_add(dp, info->vid,
flags);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
if (err)
return err;
}
}
return 0;
}
int dsa_switch_tag_8021q_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds,
struct dsa_notifier_tag_8021q_vlan_info *info)
{
struct dsa_port *dp;
int err;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
if (!ds->ops->tag_8021q_vlan_del || !ds->tag_8021q_ctx)
return 0;
dsa_switch_for_each_port(dp, ds) {
if (dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_match(dp, info)) {
err = dsa_port_do_tag_8021q_vlan_del(dp, info->vid);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
if (err)
return err;
}
}
return 0;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: Restore bridge VLANs when enabling vlan_filtering The bridge core assumes that enabling/disabling vlan_filtering will translate into the simple toggling of a flag for switchdev drivers. That is clearly not the case for sja1105, which alters the VLAN table and the pvids in order to obtain port separation in standalone mode. There are 2 parts to the issue. First, tag_8021q changes the pvid to a unique per-port rx_vid for frame identification. But we need to disable tag_8021q when vlan_filtering kicks in, and at that point, the VLAN configured as pvid will have to be removed from the filtering table of the ports. With an invalid pvid, the ports will drop all traffic. Since the bridge will not call any vlan operation through switchdev after enabling vlan_filtering, we need to ensure we're in a functional state ourselves. Hence read the pvid that the bridge is aware of, and program that into our ports. Secondly, tag_8021q uses the 1024-3071 range privately in vlan_filtering=0 mode. Had the user installed one of these VLANs during a previous vlan_filtering=1 session, then upon the next tag_8021q cleanup for vlan_filtering to kick in again, VLANs in that range will get deleted unconditionally, hence breaking user expectation. So when deleting the VLANs, check if the bridge had knowledge about them, and if it did, re-apply the settings. Wrap this logic inside a dsa_8021q_vid_apply helper function to reduce code duplication. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-30 00:53:25 +00:00
}
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
/* RX VLAN tagging (left) and TX VLAN tagging (right) setup shown for a single
* front-panel switch port (here swp0).
*
* Port identification through VLAN (802.1Q) tags has different requirements
* for it to work effectively:
* - On RX (ingress from network): each front-panel port must have a pvid
* that uniquely identifies it, and the egress of this pvid must be tagged
* towards the CPU port, so that software can recover the source port based
* on the VID in the frame. But this would only work for standalone ports;
* if bridged, this VLAN setup would break autonomous forwarding and would
* force all switched traffic to pass through the CPU. So we must also make
* the other front-panel ports members of this VID we're adding, albeit
* we're not making it their PVID (they'll still have their own).
* - On TX (ingress from CPU and towards network) we are faced with a problem.
* If we were to tag traffic (from within DSA) with the port's pvid, all
* would be well, assuming the switch ports were standalone. Frames would
* have no choice but to be directed towards the correct front-panel port.
* But because we also want the RX VLAN to not break bridging, then
* inevitably that means that we have to give them a choice (of what
* front-panel port to go out on), and therefore we cannot steer traffic
* based on the RX VID. So what we do is simply install one more VID on the
* front-panel and CPU ports, and profit off of the fact that steering will
* work just by virtue of the fact that there is only one other port that's
* a member of the VID we're tagging the traffic with - the desired one.
*
* So at the end, each front-panel port will have one RX VID (also the PVID),
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
* the RX VID of all other front-panel ports that are in the same bridge, and
* one TX VID. Whereas the CPU port will have the RX and TX VIDs of all
* front-panel ports, and on top of that, is also tagged-input and
* tagged-output (VLAN trunk).
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
*
* CPU port CPU port
* +-------------+-----+-------------+ +-------------+-----+-------------+
* | RX VID | | | | TX VID | | |
* | of swp0 | | | | of swp0 | | |
* | +-----+ | | +-----+ |
* | ^ T | | | Tagged |
* | | | | | ingress |
* | +-------+---+---+-------+ | | +-----------+ |
* | | | | | | | | Untagged |
* | | U v U v U v | | v egress |
* | +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ | | +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ |
* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
* | |PVID | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
* +-+-----+-+-----+-+-----+-+-----+-+ +-+-----+-+-----+-+-----+-+-----+-+
* swp0 swp1 swp2 swp3 swp0 swp1 swp2 swp3
*/
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
int dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
struct dsa_bridge bridge)
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
{
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
u16 standalone_vid, bridge_vid;
int err;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
/* Delete the standalone VLAN of the port and replace it with a
* bridging VLAN
*/
standalone_vid = dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vid(dp);
bridge_vid = dsa_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_offload_vid(bridge.num);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
err = dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add(dp, bridge_vid, true);
if (err)
return err;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_del(dp, standalone_vid, false);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
return 0;
}
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_join);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
void dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
struct dsa_bridge bridge)
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
{
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
u16 standalone_vid, bridge_vid;
int err;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
/* Delete the bridging VLAN of the port and replace it with a
* standalone VLAN
*/
standalone_vid = dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vid(dp);
bridge_vid = dsa_8021q_bridge_tx_fwd_offload_vid(bridge.num);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
err = dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add(dp, standalone_vid, false);
if (err) {
dev_err(ds->dev,
"Failed to delete tag_8021q standalone VLAN %d from port %d: %pe\n",
standalone_vid, port, ERR_PTR(err));
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
}
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_del(dp, bridge_vid, true);
net: dsa: sja1105: add bridge TX data plane offload based on tag_8021q The main desire for having this feature in sja1105 is to support network stack termination for traffic coming from a VLAN-aware bridge. For sja1105, offloading the bridge data plane means sending packets as-is, with the proper VLAN tag, to the chip. The chip will look up its FDB and forward them to the correct destination port. But we support bridge data plane offload even for VLAN-unaware bridges, and the implementation there is different. In fact, VLAN-unaware bridging is governed by tag_8021q, so it makes sense to have the .bridge_fwd_offload_add() implementation fully within tag_8021q. The key difference is that we only support 1 VLAN-aware bridge, but we support multiple VLAN-unaware bridges. So we need to make sure that the forwarding domain is not crossed by packets injected from the stack. For this, we introduce the concept of a tag_8021q TX VLAN for bridge forwarding offload. As opposed to the regular TX VLANs which contain only 2 ports (the user port and the CPU port), a bridge data plane TX VLAN is "multicast" (or "imprecise"): it contains all the ports that are part of a certain bridge, and the hardware will select where the packet goes within this "imprecise" forwarding domain. Each VLAN-unaware bridge has its own "imprecise" TX VLAN, so we make use of the unique "bridge_num" provided by DSA for the data plane offload. We use the same 3 bits from the tag_8021q VLAN ID format to encode this bridge number. Note that these 3 bit positions have been used before for sub-VLANs in best-effort VLAN filtering mode. The difference is that for best-effort, the sub-VLANs were only valid on RX (and it was documented that the sub-VLAN field needed to be transmitted as zero). Whereas for the bridge data plane offload, these 3 bits are only valid on TX. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-26 16:55:35 +00:00
}
net: dsa: tag_8021q: replace the SVL bridging with VLAN-unaware IVL bridging For VLAN-unaware bridging, tag_8021q uses something perhaps a bit too tied with the sja1105 switch: each port uses the same pvid which is also used for standalone operation (a unique one from which the source port and device ID can be retrieved when packets from that port are forwarded to the CPU). Since each port has a unique pvid when performing autonomous forwarding, the switch must be configured for Shared VLAN Learning (SVL) such that the VLAN ID itself is ignored when performing FDB lookups. Without SVL, packets would always be flooded, since FDB lookup in the source port's VLAN would never find any entry. First of all, to make tag_8021q more palatable to switches which might not support Shared VLAN Learning, let's just use a common VLAN for all ports that are under the same bridge. Secondly, using Shared VLAN Learning means that FDB isolation can never be enforced. But if all ports under the same VLAN-unaware bridge share the same VLAN ID, it can. The disadvantage is that the CPU port can no longer perform precise source port identification for these packets. But at least we have a mechanism which has proven to be adequate for that situation: imprecise RX (dsa_find_designated_bridge_port_by_vid), which is what we use for termination on VLAN-aware bridges. The VLAN ID that VLAN-unaware bridges will use with tag_8021q is the same one as we were previously using for imprecise TX (bridge TX forwarding offload). It is already allocated, it is just a matter of using it. Note that because now all ports under the same bridge share the same VLAN, the complexity of performing a tag_8021q bridge join decreases dramatically. We no longer have to install the RX VLAN of a newly joining port into the port membership of the existing bridge ports. The newly joining port just becomes a member of the VLAN corresponding to that bridge, and the other ports are already members of it from when they joined the bridge themselves. So forwarding works properly. This means that we can unhook dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_{join,leave} from the cross-chip notifier level dsa_switch_bridge_{join,leave}. We can put these calls directly into the sja1105 driver. With this new mode of operation, a port controlled by tag_8021q can have two pvids whereas before it could only have one. The pvid for standalone operation is different from the pvid used for VLAN-unaware bridging. This is done, again, so that FDB isolation can be enforced. Let tag_8021q manage this by deleting the standalone pvid when a port joins a bridge, and restoring it when it leaves it. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2022-02-25 09:22:16 +00:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_leave);
net: dsa: sja1105: add bridge TX data plane offload based on tag_8021q The main desire for having this feature in sja1105 is to support network stack termination for traffic coming from a VLAN-aware bridge. For sja1105, offloading the bridge data plane means sending packets as-is, with the proper VLAN tag, to the chip. The chip will look up its FDB and forward them to the correct destination port. But we support bridge data plane offload even for VLAN-unaware bridges, and the implementation there is different. In fact, VLAN-unaware bridging is governed by tag_8021q, so it makes sense to have the .bridge_fwd_offload_add() implementation fully within tag_8021q. The key difference is that we only support 1 VLAN-aware bridge, but we support multiple VLAN-unaware bridges. So we need to make sure that the forwarding domain is not crossed by packets injected from the stack. For this, we introduce the concept of a tag_8021q TX VLAN for bridge forwarding offload. As opposed to the regular TX VLANs which contain only 2 ports (the user port and the CPU port), a bridge data plane TX VLAN is "multicast" (or "imprecise"): it contains all the ports that are part of a certain bridge, and the hardware will select where the packet goes within this "imprecise" forwarding domain. Each VLAN-unaware bridge has its own "imprecise" TX VLAN, so we make use of the unique "bridge_num" provided by DSA for the data plane offload. We use the same 3 bits from the tag_8021q VLAN ID format to encode this bridge number. Note that these 3 bit positions have been used before for sub-VLANs in best-effort VLAN filtering mode. The difference is that for best-effort, the sub-VLANs were only valid on RX (and it was documented that the sub-VLAN field needed to be transmitted as zero). Whereas for the bridge data plane offload, these 3 bits are only valid on TX. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-26 16:55:35 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
/* Set up a port's tag_8021q RX and TX VLAN for standalone mode operation */
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
static int dsa_tag_8021q_port_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
{
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx = ds->tag_8021q_ctx;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
u16 rx_vid = dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vid(dp);
u16 tx_vid = dsa_tag_8021q_tx_vid(dp);
struct net_device *master;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: manage RX VLANs dynamically at bridge join/leave time There has been at least one wasted opportunity for tag_8021q to be used by a driver: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200710113611.3398-3-kurt@linutronix.de/#2484272 because of a design decision: the declared purpose of tag_8021q is to offer source port/switch identification for a tagging driver for packets coming from a switch with no hardware DSA tagging support. It is not intended to provide VLAN-based port isolation, because its first user, sja1105, had another mechanism for bridging domain isolation, the L2 Forwarding Table. So even if 2 ports are in the same VLAN but they are separated via the L2 Forwarding Table, they will not communicate with one another. The L2 Forwarding Table is managed by the sja1105_bridge_join() and sja1105_bridge_leave() methods. As a consequence, today tag_8021q does not bother too much with hooking into .port_bridge_join() and .port_bridge_leave() because that would introduce yet another degree of freedom, it just iterates statically through all ports of a switch and adds the RX VLAN of one port to all the others. In this way, whenever .port_bridge_join() is called, bridging will magically work because the RX VLANs are already installed everywhere they need to be. This is not to say that the reason for the change in this patch is to satisfy the hellcreek and similar use cases, that is merely a nice side effect. Instead it is to make sja1105 cross-chip links work properly over a DSA link. For context, sja1105 today supports a degenerate form of cross-chip bridging, where the switches are interconnected through their CPU ports ("disjoint trees" topology). There is some code which has been generalized into dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_{add,del}, but it is not enough, and frankly it is impossible to build upon that. Real multi-switch DSA trees, like daisy chains or H trees, which have actual DSA links, do not work. The problem is that sja1105 is unlike mv88e6xxx, and does not have a PVT for cross-chip bridging, which is a table by which the local switch can select the forwarding domain for packets from a certain ingress switch ID and source port. The sja1105 switches cannot parse their own DSA tags, because, well, they don't really have support for DSA tags, it's all VLANs. So to make something like cross-chip bridging between sw0p0 and sw1p0 to work over the sw0p3/sw1p3 DSA link to work with sja1105 in the topology below: | | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 [ user ] [ user ] [ cpu ] [ dsa ] ---- [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ user ] [ user ] we need to ask ourselves 2 questions: (1) how should the L2 Forwarding Table be managed? (2) how should the VLAN Lookup Table be managed? i.e. what should prevent packets from going to unwanted ports? Since as mentioned, there is no PVT, the L2 Forwarding Table only contains forwarding rules for local ports. So we can say "all user ports are allowed to forward to all CPU ports and all DSA links". If we allow forwarding to DSA links unconditionally, this means we must prevent forwarding using the VLAN Lookup Table. This is in fact asymmetric with what we do for tag_8021q on ports local to the same switch, and it matters because now that we are making tag_8021q a core DSA feature, we need to hook into .crosschip_bridge_join() to add/remove the tag_8021q VLANs. So for symmetry it makes sense to manage the VLANs for local forwarding in the same way as cross-chip forwarding. Note that there is a very precise reason why tag_8021q hooks into dsa_switch_bridge_join() which acts at the cross-chip notifier level, and not at a higher level such as dsa_port_bridge_join(). We need to install the RX VLAN of the newly joining port into the VLAN table of all the existing ports across the tree that are part of the same bridge, and the notifier already does the iteration through the switches for us. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:51 +00:00
int err;
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
/* The CPU port is implicitly configured by
* configuring the front-panel ports
*/
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
if (!dsa_port_is_user(dp))
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
return 0;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
master = dp->cpu_dp->master;
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
/* Add this user port's RX VID to the membership list of all others
* (including itself). This is so that bridging will not be hindered.
* L2 forwarding rules still take precedence when there are no VLAN
* restrictions, so there are no concerns about leaking traffic.
*/
err = dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add(dp, rx_vid, false);
if (err) {
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
dev_err(ds->dev,
"Failed to apply RX VID %d to port %d: %pe\n",
rx_vid, port, ERR_PTR(err));
return err;
}
net: dsa: sja1105: delete the best_effort_vlan_filtering mode Simply put, the best-effort VLAN filtering mode relied on VLAN retagging from a bridge VLAN towards a tag_8021q sub-VLAN in order to be able to decode the source port in the tagger, but the VLAN retagging implementation inside the sja1105 chips is not the best and we were relying on marginal operating conditions. The most notable limitation of the best-effort VLAN filtering mode is its incapacity to treat this case properly: ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 ip link set swp2 master br0 ip link set swp4 master br0 bridge vlan del dev swp4 vid 1 bridge vlan add dev swp4 vid 1 pvid When sending an untagged packet through swp2, the expectation is for it to be forwarded to swp4 as egress-tagged (so it will contain VLAN ID 1 on egress). But the switch will send it as egress-untagged. There was an attempt to fix this here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210407201452.1703261-2-olteanv@gmail.com/ but it failed miserably because it broke PTP RX timestamping, in a way that cannot be corrected due to hardware issues related to VLAN retagging. So with either PTP broken or pushing VLAN headers on egress for untagged packets being broken, the sad reality is that the best-effort VLAN filtering code is broken. Delete it. Note that this means there will be a temporary loss of functionality in this driver until it is replaced with something better (network stack RX/TX capability for "mode 2" as described in Documentation/networking/dsa/sja1105.rst, the "port under VLAN-aware bridge" case). We simply cannot keep this code until that driver rework is done, it is super bloated and tangled with tag_8021q. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:42 +00:00
/* Add @rx_vid to the master's RX filter. */
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
vlan_vid_add(master, ctx->proto, rx_vid);
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
/* Finally apply the TX VID on this port and on the CPU port */
err = dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add(dp, tx_vid, false);
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
if (err) {
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
dev_err(ds->dev,
"Failed to apply TX VID %d on port %d: %pe\n",
tx_vid, port, ERR_PTR(err));
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
return err;
}
net: dsa: tag_8021q: Restore bridge VLANs when enabling vlan_filtering The bridge core assumes that enabling/disabling vlan_filtering will translate into the simple toggling of a flag for switchdev drivers. That is clearly not the case for sja1105, which alters the VLAN table and the pvids in order to obtain port separation in standalone mode. There are 2 parts to the issue. First, tag_8021q changes the pvid to a unique per-port rx_vid for frame identification. But we need to disable tag_8021q when vlan_filtering kicks in, and at that point, the VLAN configured as pvid will have to be removed from the filtering table of the ports. With an invalid pvid, the ports will drop all traffic. Since the bridge will not call any vlan operation through switchdev after enabling vlan_filtering, we need to ensure we're in a functional state ourselves. Hence read the pvid that the bridge is aware of, and program that into our ports. Secondly, tag_8021q uses the 1024-3071 range privately in vlan_filtering=0 mode. Had the user installed one of these VLANs during a previous vlan_filtering=1 session, then upon the next tag_8021q cleanup for vlan_filtering to kick in again, VLANs in that range will get deleted unconditionally, hence breaking user expectation. So when deleting the VLANs, check if the bridge had knowledge about them, and if it did, re-apply the settings. Wrap this logic inside a dsa_8021q_vid_apply helper function to reduce code duplication. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-08-30 00:53:25 +00:00
return err;
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
}
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
static void dsa_tag_8021q_port_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
{
struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx = ds->tag_8021q_ctx;
struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
u16 rx_vid = dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vid(dp);
u16 tx_vid = dsa_tag_8021q_tx_vid(dp);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
struct net_device *master;
/* The CPU port is implicitly configured by
* configuring the front-panel ports
*/
if (!dsa_port_is_user(dp))
return;
master = dp->cpu_dp->master;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: don't broadcast during setup/teardown Currently, on my board with multiple sja1105 switches in disjoint trees described in commit f66a6a69f97a ("net: dsa: permit cross-chip bridging between all trees in the system"), rebooting the board triggers the following benign warnings: [ 12.345566] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1088 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.353804] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2112 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.362019] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1089 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.370246] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2113 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.378466] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1090 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.386683] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2114 deletion: -ENOENT Basically switch 1 calls dsa_tag_8021q_unregister, and switch 1's TX and RX VLANs cannot be found on switch 2's CPU port. But why would switch 2 even attempt to delete switch 1's TX and RX tag_8021q VLANs from its CPU port? Well, because we use dsa_broadcast, and it is supposed that it had added those VLANs in the first place (because in dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_match, all CPU ports match regardless of their tree index or switch index). The two trees probe asynchronously, and when switch 1 probed, it called dsa_broadcast which did not notify the tree of switch 2, because that didn't probe yet. But during unbind, switch 2's tree _is_ probed, so it _is_ notified of the deletion. Before jumping to introduce a synchronization mechanism between the probing across disjoint switch trees, let's take a step back and see whether we _need_ to do that in the first place. The RX and TX VLANs of switch 1 would be needed on switch 2's CPU port only if switch 1 and 2 were part of a cross-chip bridge. And dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_join takes care precisely of that (but if probing was synchronous, the bridge_join would just end up bumping the VLANs' refcount, because they are already installed by the setup path). Since by the time the ports are bridged, all DSA trees are already set up, and we don't need the tag_8021q VLANs of one switch installed on the other switches during probe time, the answer is that we don't need to fix the synchronization issue. So make the setup and teardown code paths call dsa_port_notify, which notifies only the local tree, and the bridge code paths call dsa_broadcast, which let the other trees know as well. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-11 13:46:06 +00:00
dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_del(dp, rx_vid, false);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
vlan_vid_del(master, ctx->proto, rx_vid);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: don't broadcast during setup/teardown Currently, on my board with multiple sja1105 switches in disjoint trees described in commit f66a6a69f97a ("net: dsa: permit cross-chip bridging between all trees in the system"), rebooting the board triggers the following benign warnings: [ 12.345566] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1088 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.353804] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2112 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.362019] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1089 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.370246] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2113 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.378466] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1090 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.386683] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2114 deletion: -ENOENT Basically switch 1 calls dsa_tag_8021q_unregister, and switch 1's TX and RX VLANs cannot be found on switch 2's CPU port. But why would switch 2 even attempt to delete switch 1's TX and RX tag_8021q VLANs from its CPU port? Well, because we use dsa_broadcast, and it is supposed that it had added those VLANs in the first place (because in dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_match, all CPU ports match regardless of their tree index or switch index). The two trees probe asynchronously, and when switch 1 probed, it called dsa_broadcast which did not notify the tree of switch 2, because that didn't probe yet. But during unbind, switch 2's tree _is_ probed, so it _is_ notified of the deletion. Before jumping to introduce a synchronization mechanism between the probing across disjoint switch trees, let's take a step back and see whether we _need_ to do that in the first place. The RX and TX VLANs of switch 1 would be needed on switch 2's CPU port only if switch 1 and 2 were part of a cross-chip bridge. And dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_join takes care precisely of that (but if probing was synchronous, the bridge_join would just end up bumping the VLANs' refcount, because they are already installed by the setup path). Since by the time the ports are bridged, all DSA trees are already set up, and we don't need the tag_8021q VLANs of one switch installed on the other switches during probe time, the answer is that we don't need to fix the synchronization issue. So make the setup and teardown code paths call dsa_port_notify, which notifies only the local tree, and the bridge code paths call dsa_broadcast, which let the other trees know as well. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-08-11 13:46:06 +00:00
dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_del(dp, tx_vid, false);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
}
static int dsa_tag_8021q_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
int err, port;
ASSERT_RTNL();
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) {
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
err = dsa_tag_8021q_port_setup(ds, port);
if (err < 0) {
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
dev_err(ds->dev,
"Failed to setup VLAN tagging for port %d: %pe\n",
port, ERR_PTR(err));
return err;
}
}
return 0;
}
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
static void dsa_tag_8021q_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
net: dsa: sja1105: implement cross-chip bridging operations sja1105 uses dsa_8021q for DSA tagging, a format which is VLAN at heart and which is compatible with cascading. A complete description of this tagging format is in net/dsa/tag_8021q.c, but a quick summary is that each external-facing port tags incoming frames with a unique pvid, and this special VLAN is transmitted as tagged towards the inside of the system, and as untagged towards the exterior. The tag encodes the switch id and the source port index. This means that cross-chip bridging for dsa_8021q only entails adding the dsa_8021q pvids of one switch to the RX filter of the other switches. Everything else falls naturally into place, as long as the bottom-end of ports (the leaves in the tree) is comprised exclusively of dsa_8021q-compatible (i.e. sja1105 switches). Otherwise, there would be a chance that a front-panel switch transmits a packet tagged with a dsa_8021q header, header which it wouldn't be able to remove, and which would hence "leak" out. The only use case I tested (due to lack of board availability) was when the sja1105 switches are part of disjoint trees (however, this doesn't change the fact that multiple sja1105 switches still need unique switch identifiers in such a system). But in principle, even "true" single-tree setups (with DSA links) should work just as fine, except for a small change which I can't test: dsa_towards_port should be used instead of dsa_upstream_port (I made the assumption that the routing port that any sja1105 should use towards its neighbours is the CPU port. That might not hold true in other setups). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-05-10 16:37:43 +00:00
{
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
int port;
net: dsa: sja1105: implement cross-chip bridging operations sja1105 uses dsa_8021q for DSA tagging, a format which is VLAN at heart and which is compatible with cascading. A complete description of this tagging format is in net/dsa/tag_8021q.c, but a quick summary is that each external-facing port tags incoming frames with a unique pvid, and this special VLAN is transmitted as tagged towards the inside of the system, and as untagged towards the exterior. The tag encodes the switch id and the source port index. This means that cross-chip bridging for dsa_8021q only entails adding the dsa_8021q pvids of one switch to the RX filter of the other switches. Everything else falls naturally into place, as long as the bottom-end of ports (the leaves in the tree) is comprised exclusively of dsa_8021q-compatible (i.e. sja1105 switches). Otherwise, there would be a chance that a front-panel switch transmits a packet tagged with a dsa_8021q header, header which it wouldn't be able to remove, and which would hence "leak" out. The only use case I tested (due to lack of board availability) was when the sja1105 switches are part of disjoint trees (however, this doesn't change the fact that multiple sja1105 switches still need unique switch identifiers in such a system). But in principle, even "true" single-tree setups (with DSA links) should work just as fine, except for a small change which I can't test: dsa_towards_port should be used instead of dsa_upstream_port (I made the assumption that the routing port that any sja1105 should use towards its neighbours is the CPU port. That might not hold true in other setups). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-05-10 16:37:43 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
ASSERT_RTNL();
net: dsa: sja1105: implement cross-chip bridging operations sja1105 uses dsa_8021q for DSA tagging, a format which is VLAN at heart and which is compatible with cascading. A complete description of this tagging format is in net/dsa/tag_8021q.c, but a quick summary is that each external-facing port tags incoming frames with a unique pvid, and this special VLAN is transmitted as tagged towards the inside of the system, and as untagged towards the exterior. The tag encodes the switch id and the source port index. This means that cross-chip bridging for dsa_8021q only entails adding the dsa_8021q pvids of one switch to the RX filter of the other switches. Everything else falls naturally into place, as long as the bottom-end of ports (the leaves in the tree) is comprised exclusively of dsa_8021q-compatible (i.e. sja1105 switches). Otherwise, there would be a chance that a front-panel switch transmits a packet tagged with a dsa_8021q header, header which it wouldn't be able to remove, and which would hence "leak" out. The only use case I tested (due to lack of board availability) was when the sja1105 switches are part of disjoint trees (however, this doesn't change the fact that multiple sja1105 switches still need unique switch identifiers in such a system). But in principle, even "true" single-tree setups (with DSA links) should work just as fine, except for a small change which I can't test: dsa_towards_port should be used instead of dsa_upstream_port (I made the assumption that the routing port that any sja1105 should use towards its neighbours is the CPU port. That might not hold true in other setups). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-05-10 16:37:43 +00:00
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++)
dsa_tag_8021q_port_teardown(ds, port);
net: dsa: sja1105: implement cross-chip bridging operations sja1105 uses dsa_8021q for DSA tagging, a format which is VLAN at heart and which is compatible with cascading. A complete description of this tagging format is in net/dsa/tag_8021q.c, but a quick summary is that each external-facing port tags incoming frames with a unique pvid, and this special VLAN is transmitted as tagged towards the inside of the system, and as untagged towards the exterior. The tag encodes the switch id and the source port index. This means that cross-chip bridging for dsa_8021q only entails adding the dsa_8021q pvids of one switch to the RX filter of the other switches. Everything else falls naturally into place, as long as the bottom-end of ports (the leaves in the tree) is comprised exclusively of dsa_8021q-compatible (i.e. sja1105 switches). Otherwise, there would be a chance that a front-panel switch transmits a packet tagged with a dsa_8021q header, header which it wouldn't be able to remove, and which would hence "leak" out. The only use case I tested (due to lack of board availability) was when the sja1105 switches are part of disjoint trees (however, this doesn't change the fact that multiple sja1105 switches still need unique switch identifiers in such a system). But in principle, even "true" single-tree setups (with DSA links) should work just as fine, except for a small change which I can't test: dsa_towards_port should be used instead of dsa_upstream_port (I made the assumption that the routing port that any sja1105 should use towards its neighbours is the CPU port. That might not hold true in other setups). Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-05-10 16:37:43 +00:00
}
int dsa_tag_8021q_register(struct dsa_switch *ds, __be16 proto)
{
struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx;
ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ctx)
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
return -ENOMEM;
ctx->proto = proto;
ctx->ds = ds;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->vlans);
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
ds->tag_8021q_ctx = ctx;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
return dsa_tag_8021q_setup(ds);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_tag_8021q_register);
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
void dsa_tag_8021q_unregister(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx = ds->tag_8021q_ctx;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
struct dsa_tag_8021q_vlan *v, *n;
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
dsa_tag_8021q_teardown(ds);
net: dsa: tag_8021q: add proper cross-chip notifier support The big problem which mandates cross-chip notifiers for tag_8021q is this: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] When the user runs: ip link add br0 type bridge ip link set sw0p0 master br0 ip link set sw2p0 master br0 It doesn't work. This is because dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join() assumes that "ds" and "other_ds" are at most 1 hop away from each other, so it is sufficient to add the RX VLAN of {ds, port} into {other_ds, other_port} and vice versa and presto, the cross-chip link works. When there is another switch in the middle, such as in this case switch 1 with its DSA links sw1p3 and sw1p4, somebody needs to tell it about these VLANs too. Which is exactly why the problem is quadratic: when a port joins a bridge, for each port in the tree that's already in that same bridge we notify a tag_8021q VLAN addition of that port's RX VLAN to the entire tree. It is a very complicated web of VLANs. It must be mentioned that currently we install tag_8021q VLANs on too many ports (DSA links - to be precise, on all of them). For example, when sw2p0 joins br0, and assuming sw1p0 was part of br0 too, we add the RX VLAN of sw2p0 on the DSA links of switch 0 too, even though there isn't any port of switch 0 that is a member of br0 (at least yet). In theory we could notify only the switches which sit in between the port joining the bridge and the port reacting to that bridge_join event. But in practice that is impossible, because of the way 'link' properties are described in the device tree. The DSA bindings require DT writers to list out not only the real/physical DSA links, but in fact the entire routing table, like for example switch 0 above will have: sw0p3: port@3 { link = <&sw1p4 &sw2p4>; }; This was done because: /* TODO: ideally DSA ports would have a single dp->link_dp member, * and no dst->rtable nor this struct dsa_link would be needed, * but this would require some more complex tree walking, * so keep it stupid at the moment and list them all. */ but it is a perfect example of a situation where too much information is actively detrimential, because we are now in the position where we cannot distinguish a real DSA link from one that is put there to avoid the 'complex tree walking'. And because DT is ABI, there is not much we can change. And because we do not know which DSA links are real and which ones aren't, we can't really know if DSA switch A is in the data path between switches B and C, in the general case. So this is why tag_8021q RX VLANs are added on all DSA links, and probably why it will never change. On the other hand, at least the number of additions/deletions is well balanced, and this means that once we implement reference counting at the cross-chip notifier level a la fdb/mdb, there is absolutely zero need for a struct dsa_8021q_crosschip_link, it's all self-managing. In fact, with the tag_8021q notifiers emitted from the bridge join notifiers, it becomes so generic that sja1105 does not need to do anything anymore, we can just delete its implementation of the .crosschip_bridge_{join,leave} methods. Among other things we can simply delete is the home-grown implementation of sja1105_notify_crosschip_switches(). The reason why that is wrong is because it is not quadratic - it only covers remote switches to which we have a cross-chip bridging link and that does not cover in-between switches. This deletion is part of the same patch because sja1105 used to poke deep inside the guts of the tag_8021q context in order to do that. Because the cross-chip links went away, so needs the sja1105 code. Last but not least, dsa_8021q_setup_port() is simplified (and also renamed). Because our TAG_8021Q_VLAN_ADD notifier is designed to react on the CPU port too, the four dsa_8021q_vid_apply() calls: - 1 for RX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's RX VLAN on the CPU port - 1 for TX VLAN on user port - 1 for the user port's TX VLAN on the CPU port now get squashed into only 2 notifier calls via dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_add. And because the notifiers to add and to delete a tag_8021q VLAN are distinct, now we finally break up the port setup and teardown into separate functions instead of relying on a "bool enabled" flag which tells us what to do. Arguably it should have been this way from the get go. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:52 +00:00
list_for_each_entry_safe(v, n, &ctx->vlans, list) {
list_del(&v->list);
kfree(v);
}
net: dsa: let the core manage the tag_8021q context The basic problem description is as follows: Be there 3 switches in a daisy chain topology: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] The CPU will not be able to ping through the user ports of the bottom-most switch (like for example sw2p0), simply because tag_8021q was not coded up for this scenario - it has always assumed DSA switch trees with a single switch. To add support for the topology above, we must admit that the RX VLAN of sw2p0 must be added on some ports of switches 0 and 1 as well. This is in fact a textbook example of thing that can use the cross-chip notifier framework that DSA has set up in switch.c. There is only one problem: core DSA (switch.c) is not able right now to make the connection between a struct dsa_switch *ds and a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx. Right now, it is drivers who call into tag_8021q.c and always provide a struct dsa_8021q_context *ctx pointer, and tag_8021q.c calls them back with the .tag_8021q_vlan_{add,del} methods. But with cross-chip notifiers, it is possible for tag_8021q to call drivers without drivers having ever asked for anything. A good example is right above: when sw2p0 wants to set itself up for tag_8021q, the .tag_8021q_vlan_add method needs to be called for switches 1 and 0, so that they transport sw2p0's VLANs towards the CPU without dropping them. So instead of letting drivers manage the tag_8021q context, add a tag_8021q_ctx pointer inside of struct dsa_switch, which will be populated when dsa_tag_8021q_register() returns success. The patch is fairly long-winded because we are partly reverting commit 5899ee367ab3 ("net: dsa: tag_8021q: add a context structure") which made the driver-facing tag_8021q API use "ctx" instead of "ds". Now that we can access "ctx" directly from "ds", this is no longer needed. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2021-07-19 17:14:48 +00:00
ds->tag_8021q_ctx = NULL;
kfree(ctx);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_tag_8021q_unregister);
net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging This patch provides generic DSA code for using VLAN (802.1Q) tags for the same purpose as a dedicated switch tag for injection/extraction. It is based on the discussions and interest that has been so far expressed in https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556125.html. Unlike all other DSA-supported tagging protocols, CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q does not offer a complete solution for drivers (nor can it). Instead, it provides generic code that driver can opt into calling: - dsa_8021q_xmit: Inserts a VLAN header with the specified contents. Can be called from another tagging protocol's xmit function. Currently the LAN9303 driver is inserting headers that are simply 802.1Q with custom fields, so this is an opportunity for code reuse. - dsa_8021q_rcv: Retrieves the TPID and TCI from a VLAN-tagged skb. Removing the VLAN header is left as a decision for the caller to make. - dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging: For each user port, installs an Rx VID and a Tx VID, for proper untagged traffic identification on ingress and steering on egress. Also sets up the VLAN trunk on the upstream (CPU or DSA) port. Drivers are intentionally left to call this function explicitly, depending on the context and hardware support. The expected switch behavior and VLAN semantics should not be violated under any conditions. That is, after calling dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging, the hardware should still pass all ingress traffic, be it tagged or untagged. For uniformity with the other tagging protocols, a module for the dsa_8021q_netdev_ops structure is registered, but the typical usage is to set up another tagging protocol which selects CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_8021Q, and calls the API from tag_8021q.h. Null function definitions are also provided so that a "depends on" is not forced in the Kconfig. This tagging protocol only works when switch ports are standalone, or when they are added to a VLAN-unaware bridge. It will probably remain this way for the reasons below. When added to a bridge that has vlan_filtering 1, the bridge core will install its own VLANs and reset the pvids through switchdev. For the bridge core, switchdev is a write-only pipe. All VLAN-related state is kept in the bridge core and nothing is read from DSA/switchdev or from the driver. So the bridge core will break this port separation because it will install the vlan_default_pvid into all switchdev ports. Even if we could teach the bridge driver about switchdev preference of a certain vlan_default_pvid (task difficult in itself since the current setting is per-bridge but we would need it per-port), there would still exist many other challenges. Firstly, in the DSA rcv callback, a driver would have to perform an iterative reverse lookup to find the correct switch port. That is because the port is a bridge slave, so its Rx VID (port PVID) is subject to user configuration. How would we ensure that the user doesn't reset the pvid to a different value (which would make an O(1) translation impossible), or to a non-unique value within this DSA switch tree (which would make any translation impossible)? Finally, not all switch ports are equal in DSA, and that makes it difficult for the bridge to be completely aware of this anyway. The CPU port needs to transmit tagged packets (VLAN trunk) in order for the DSA rcv code to be able to decode source information. But the bridge code has absolutely no idea which switch port is the CPU port, if nothing else then just because there is no netdevice registered by DSA for the CPU port. Also DSA does not currently allow the user to specify that they want the CPU port to do VLAN trunking anyway. VLANs are added to the CPU port using the same flags as they were added on the user port. So the VLANs installed by dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging per driver request should remain private from the bridge's and user's perspective, and should not alter the VLAN semantics observed by the user. In the current implementation a VLAN range ending at 4095 (VLAN_N_VID) is reserved for this purpose. Each port receives a unique Rx VLAN and a unique Tx VLAN. Separate VLANs are needed for Rx and Tx because they serve different purposes: on Rx the switch must process traffic as untagged and process it with a port-based VLAN, but with care not to hinder bridging. On the other hand, the Tx VLAN is where the reachability restrictions are imposed, since by tagging frames in the xmit callback we are telling the switch onto which port to steer the frame. Some general guidance on how this support might be employed for real-life hardware (some comments made by Florian Fainelli): - If the hardware supports VLAN tag stacking, it should somehow back up its private VLAN settings when the bridge tries to override them. Then the driver could re-apply them as outer tags. Dedicating an outer tag per bridge device would allow identical inner tag VID numbers to co-exist, yet preserve broadcast domain isolation. - If the switch cannot handle VLAN tag stacking, it should disable this port separation when added as slave to a vlan_filtering bridge, in that case having reduced functionality. - Drivers for old switches that don't support the entire VLAN_N_VID range will need to rework the current range selection mechanism. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-05-05 10:19:22 +00:00
struct sk_buff *dsa_8021q_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev,
u16 tpid, u16 tci)
{
/* skb->data points at skb_mac_header, which
* is fine for vlan_insert_tag.
*/
return vlan_insert_tag(skb, htons(tpid), tci);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_8021q_xmit);
struct net_device *dsa_tag_8021q_find_port_by_vbid(struct net_device *master,
int vbid)
{
struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = master->dsa_ptr;
struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = cpu_dp->dst;
struct dsa_port *dp;
if (WARN_ON(!vbid))
return NULL;
dsa_tree_for_each_user_port(dp, dst) {
if (!dp->bridge)
continue;
if (dp->stp_state != BR_STATE_LEARNING &&
dp->stp_state != BR_STATE_FORWARDING)
continue;
if (dp->cpu_dp != cpu_dp)
continue;
if (dsa_port_bridge_num_get(dp) == vbid)
return dp->slave;
}
return NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_tag_8021q_find_port_by_vbid);
void dsa_8021q_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, int *source_port, int *switch_id,
int *vbid)
{
u16 vid, tci;
if (skb_vlan_tag_present(skb)) {
tci = skb_vlan_tag_get(skb);
__vlan_hwaccel_clear_tag(skb);
} else {
skb_push_rcsum(skb, ETH_HLEN);
__skb_vlan_pop(skb, &tci);
skb_pull_rcsum(skb, ETH_HLEN);
}
vid = tci & VLAN_VID_MASK;
*source_port = dsa_8021q_rx_source_port(vid);
*switch_id = dsa_8021q_rx_switch_id(vid);
if (vbid)
*vbid = dsa_tag_8021q_rx_vbid(vid);
skb->priority = (tci & VLAN_PRIO_MASK) >> VLAN_PRIO_SHIFT;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dsa_8021q_rcv);