linux-stable/include/linux/posix-timers.h

264 lines
7.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 14:07:57 +00:00
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
#ifndef _linux_POSIX_TIMERS_H
#define _linux_POSIX_TIMERS_H
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
posix-cpu-timers: Implement the missing timer_wait_running callback For some unknown reason the introduction of the timer_wait_running callback missed to fixup posix CPU timers, which went unnoticed for almost four years. Marco reported recently that the WARN_ON() in timer_wait_running() triggers with a posix CPU timer test case. Posix CPU timers have two execution models for expiring timers depending on CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK: 1) If not enabled, the expiry happens in hard interrupt context so spin waiting on the remote CPU is reasonably time bound. Implement an empty stub function for that case. 2) If enabled, the expiry happens in task work before returning to user space or guest mode. The expired timers are marked as firing and moved from the timer queue to a local list head with sighand lock held. Once the timers are moved, sighand lock is dropped and the expiry happens in fully preemptible context. That means the expiring task can be scheduled out, migrated, interrupted etc. So spin waiting on it is more than suboptimal. The timer wheel has a timer_wait_running() mechanism for RT, which uses a per CPU timer-base expiry lock which is held by the expiry code and the task waiting for the timer function to complete blocks on that lock. This does not work in the same way for posix CPU timers as there is no timer base and expiry for process wide timers can run on any task belonging to that process, but the concept of waiting on an expiry lock can be used too in a slightly different way: - Add a mutex to struct posix_cputimers_work. This struct is per task and used to schedule the expiry task work from the timer interrupt. - Add a task_struct pointer to struct cpu_timer which is used to store a the task which runs the expiry. That's filled in when the task moves the expired timers to the local expiry list. That's not affecting the size of the k_itimer union as there are bigger union members already - Let the task take the expiry mutex around the expiry function - Let the waiter acquire a task reference with rcu_read_lock() held and block on the expiry mutex This avoids spin-waiting on a task which might not even be on a CPU and works nicely for RT too. Fixes: ec8f954a40da ("posix-timers: Use a callback for cancel synchronization on PREEMPT_RT") Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zg764ojw.ffs@tglx
2023-04-17 13:37:55 +00:00
#include <linux/mutex.h>
timers: Posix interface for alarm-timers This patch exposes alarm-timers to userland via the posix clock and timers interface, using two new clockids: CLOCK_REALTIME_ALARM and CLOCK_BOOTTIME_ALARM. Both clockids behave identically to CLOCK_REALTIME and CLOCK_BOOTTIME, respectively, but timers set against the _ALARM suffixed clockids will wake the system if it is suspended. Some background can be found here: https://lwn.net/Articles/429925/ The concept for Alarm-timers was inspired by the Android Alarm driver (by Arve Hjønnevåg) found in the Android kernel tree. See: http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/common.git;a=blob;f=drivers/rtc/alarm.c;h=1250edfbdf3302f5e4ea6194847c6ef4bb7beb1c;hb=android-2.6.36 While the in-kernel interface is pretty similar between alarm-timers and Android alarm driver, the user-space interface for the Android alarm driver is via ioctls to a new char device. As mentioned above, I've instead chosen to export this functionality via the posix interface, as it seemed a little simpler and avoids creating duplicate interfaces to things like CLOCK_REALTIME and CLOCK_MONOTONIC under alternate names (ie:ANDROID_ALARM_RTC and ANDROID_ALARM_SYSTEMTIME). The semantics of the Android alarm driver are different from what this posix interface provides. For instance, threads other then the thread waiting on the Android alarm driver are able to modify the alarm being waited on. Also this interface does not allow the same wakelock semantics that the Android driver provides (ie: kernel takes a wakelock on RTC alarm-interupt, and holds it through process wakeup, and while the process runs, until the process either closes the char device or calls back in to wait on a new alarm). One potential way to implement similar semantics may be via the timerfd infrastructure, but this needs more research. There may also need to be some sort of sysfs system level policy hooks that allow alarm timers to be disabled to keep them from firing at inappropriate times (ie: laptop in a well insulated bag, mid-flight). CC: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> CC: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
2011-01-11 17:54:33 +00:00
#include <linux/alarmtimer.h>
#include <linux/timerqueue.h>
struct kernel_siginfo;
struct task_struct;
/*
* Bit fields within a clockid:
*
* The most significant 29 bits hold either a pid or a file descriptor.
*
* Bit 2 indicates whether a cpu clock refers to a thread or a process.
*
* Bits 1 and 0 give the type: PROF=0, VIRT=1, SCHED=2, or FD=3.
*
* A clockid is invalid if bits 2, 1, and 0 are all set.
*/
#define CPUCLOCK_PID(clock) ((pid_t) ~((clock) >> 3))
#define CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(clock) \
(((clock) & (clockid_t) CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD_MASK) != 0)
#define CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD_MASK 4
#define CPUCLOCK_WHICH(clock) ((clock) & (clockid_t) CPUCLOCK_CLOCK_MASK)
#define CPUCLOCK_CLOCK_MASK 3
#define CPUCLOCK_PROF 0
#define CPUCLOCK_VIRT 1
#define CPUCLOCK_SCHED 2
#define CPUCLOCK_MAX 3
#define CLOCKFD CPUCLOCK_MAX
#define CLOCKFD_MASK (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD_MASK|CPUCLOCK_CLOCK_MASK)
static inline clockid_t make_process_cpuclock(const unsigned int pid,
const clockid_t clock)
{
return ((~pid) << 3) | clock;
}
static inline clockid_t make_thread_cpuclock(const unsigned int tid,
const clockid_t clock)
{
return make_process_cpuclock(tid, clock | CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD_MASK);
}
static inline clockid_t fd_to_clockid(const int fd)
{
return make_process_cpuclock((unsigned int) fd, CLOCKFD);
}
static inline int clockid_to_fd(const clockid_t clk)
{
return ~(clk >> 3);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS
/**
* cpu_timer - Posix CPU timer representation for k_itimer
* @node: timerqueue node to queue in the task/sig
* @head: timerqueue head on which this timer is queued
posix-cpu-timers: Implement the missing timer_wait_running callback For some unknown reason the introduction of the timer_wait_running callback missed to fixup posix CPU timers, which went unnoticed for almost four years. Marco reported recently that the WARN_ON() in timer_wait_running() triggers with a posix CPU timer test case. Posix CPU timers have two execution models for expiring timers depending on CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK: 1) If not enabled, the expiry happens in hard interrupt context so spin waiting on the remote CPU is reasonably time bound. Implement an empty stub function for that case. 2) If enabled, the expiry happens in task work before returning to user space or guest mode. The expired timers are marked as firing and moved from the timer queue to a local list head with sighand lock held. Once the timers are moved, sighand lock is dropped and the expiry happens in fully preemptible context. That means the expiring task can be scheduled out, migrated, interrupted etc. So spin waiting on it is more than suboptimal. The timer wheel has a timer_wait_running() mechanism for RT, which uses a per CPU timer-base expiry lock which is held by the expiry code and the task waiting for the timer function to complete blocks on that lock. This does not work in the same way for posix CPU timers as there is no timer base and expiry for process wide timers can run on any task belonging to that process, but the concept of waiting on an expiry lock can be used too in a slightly different way: - Add a mutex to struct posix_cputimers_work. This struct is per task and used to schedule the expiry task work from the timer interrupt. - Add a task_struct pointer to struct cpu_timer which is used to store a the task which runs the expiry. That's filled in when the task moves the expired timers to the local expiry list. That's not affecting the size of the k_itimer union as there are bigger union members already - Let the task take the expiry mutex around the expiry function - Let the waiter acquire a task reference with rcu_read_lock() held and block on the expiry mutex This avoids spin-waiting on a task which might not even be on a CPU and works nicely for RT too. Fixes: ec8f954a40da ("posix-timers: Use a callback for cancel synchronization on PREEMPT_RT") Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zg764ojw.ffs@tglx
2023-04-17 13:37:55 +00:00
* @pid: Pointer to target task PID
* @elist: List head for the expiry list
* @firing: Timer is currently firing
posix-cpu-timers: Implement the missing timer_wait_running callback For some unknown reason the introduction of the timer_wait_running callback missed to fixup posix CPU timers, which went unnoticed for almost four years. Marco reported recently that the WARN_ON() in timer_wait_running() triggers with a posix CPU timer test case. Posix CPU timers have two execution models for expiring timers depending on CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK: 1) If not enabled, the expiry happens in hard interrupt context so spin waiting on the remote CPU is reasonably time bound. Implement an empty stub function for that case. 2) If enabled, the expiry happens in task work before returning to user space or guest mode. The expired timers are marked as firing and moved from the timer queue to a local list head with sighand lock held. Once the timers are moved, sighand lock is dropped and the expiry happens in fully preemptible context. That means the expiring task can be scheduled out, migrated, interrupted etc. So spin waiting on it is more than suboptimal. The timer wheel has a timer_wait_running() mechanism for RT, which uses a per CPU timer-base expiry lock which is held by the expiry code and the task waiting for the timer function to complete blocks on that lock. This does not work in the same way for posix CPU timers as there is no timer base and expiry for process wide timers can run on any task belonging to that process, but the concept of waiting on an expiry lock can be used too in a slightly different way: - Add a mutex to struct posix_cputimers_work. This struct is per task and used to schedule the expiry task work from the timer interrupt. - Add a task_struct pointer to struct cpu_timer which is used to store a the task which runs the expiry. That's filled in when the task moves the expired timers to the local expiry list. That's not affecting the size of the k_itimer union as there are bigger union members already - Let the task take the expiry mutex around the expiry function - Let the waiter acquire a task reference with rcu_read_lock() held and block on the expiry mutex This avoids spin-waiting on a task which might not even be on a CPU and works nicely for RT too. Fixes: ec8f954a40da ("posix-timers: Use a callback for cancel synchronization on PREEMPT_RT") Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zg764ojw.ffs@tglx
2023-04-17 13:37:55 +00:00
* @handling: Pointer to the task which handles expiry
*/
struct cpu_timer {
posix-cpu-timers: Implement the missing timer_wait_running callback For some unknown reason the introduction of the timer_wait_running callback missed to fixup posix CPU timers, which went unnoticed for almost four years. Marco reported recently that the WARN_ON() in timer_wait_running() triggers with a posix CPU timer test case. Posix CPU timers have two execution models for expiring timers depending on CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK: 1) If not enabled, the expiry happens in hard interrupt context so spin waiting on the remote CPU is reasonably time bound. Implement an empty stub function for that case. 2) If enabled, the expiry happens in task work before returning to user space or guest mode. The expired timers are marked as firing and moved from the timer queue to a local list head with sighand lock held. Once the timers are moved, sighand lock is dropped and the expiry happens in fully preemptible context. That means the expiring task can be scheduled out, migrated, interrupted etc. So spin waiting on it is more than suboptimal. The timer wheel has a timer_wait_running() mechanism for RT, which uses a per CPU timer-base expiry lock which is held by the expiry code and the task waiting for the timer function to complete blocks on that lock. This does not work in the same way for posix CPU timers as there is no timer base and expiry for process wide timers can run on any task belonging to that process, but the concept of waiting on an expiry lock can be used too in a slightly different way: - Add a mutex to struct posix_cputimers_work. This struct is per task and used to schedule the expiry task work from the timer interrupt. - Add a task_struct pointer to struct cpu_timer which is used to store a the task which runs the expiry. That's filled in when the task moves the expired timers to the local expiry list. That's not affecting the size of the k_itimer union as there are bigger union members already - Let the task take the expiry mutex around the expiry function - Let the waiter acquire a task reference with rcu_read_lock() held and block on the expiry mutex This avoids spin-waiting on a task which might not even be on a CPU and works nicely for RT too. Fixes: ec8f954a40da ("posix-timers: Use a callback for cancel synchronization on PREEMPT_RT") Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zg764ojw.ffs@tglx
2023-04-17 13:37:55 +00:00
struct timerqueue_node node;
struct timerqueue_head *head;
struct pid *pid;
struct list_head elist;
int firing;
struct task_struct __rcu *handling;
};
static inline bool cpu_timer_enqueue(struct timerqueue_head *head,
struct cpu_timer *ctmr)
{
ctmr->head = head;
return timerqueue_add(head, &ctmr->node);
}
posix-cpu-timers: Recalc next expiration when timer_settime() ends up not queueing There are several scenarios that can result in posix_cpu_timer_set() not queueing the timer but still leaving the threadgroup cputime counter running or keeping the tick dependency around for a random amount of time. 1) If timer_settime() is called with a 0 expiration on a timer that is already disabled, the process wide cputime counter will be started and won't ever get a chance to be stopped by stop_process_timer() since no timer is actually armed to be processed. The following snippet is enough to trigger the issue. void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); timer_delete(id); } 2) If timer_settime() is called with a 0 expiration on a timer that is already armed, the timer is dequeued but not really disarmed. So the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency may still remain a while around. The following code snippet keeps this overhead around for one week after the timer deletion: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; val.it_value.tv_sec = 604800; timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); timer_settime(id, 0, &val, NULL); timer_delete(id); } 3) If the timer was initially deactivated, this call to timer_settime() with an early expiration may have started the process wide cputime counter even though the timer hasn't been queued and armed because it has fired early and inline within posix_cpu_timer_set() itself. As a result the process wide cputime counter may never stop until a new timer is ever armed in the future. The following code snippet can reproduce this: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN); timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); val.it_value.tv_nsec = 1; timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); } 4) If the timer was initially armed with a former expiration value before this call to timer_settime() and the current call sets an early deadline that has already expired, the timer fires inline within posix_cpu_timer_set(). In this case it must have been dequeued before firing inline with its new expiration value, yet it hasn't been disarmed in this case. So the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency may still be around for a while even after the timer fired. The following code snippet can reproduce this: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN); timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); val.it_value.tv_sec = 100; timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); val.it_value.tv_sec = 0; val.it_value.tv_nsec = 1; timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); } Fix all these issues with triggering the related base next expiration recalculation on the next tick. This also implies to re-evaluate the need to keep around the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency, in a similar fashion to disarm_timer(). Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-7-frederic@kernel.org
2021-07-26 12:55:13 +00:00
static inline bool cpu_timer_queued(struct cpu_timer *ctmr)
{
return !!ctmr->head;
}
static inline bool cpu_timer_dequeue(struct cpu_timer *ctmr)
{
posix-cpu-timers: Recalc next expiration when timer_settime() ends up not queueing There are several scenarios that can result in posix_cpu_timer_set() not queueing the timer but still leaving the threadgroup cputime counter running or keeping the tick dependency around for a random amount of time. 1) If timer_settime() is called with a 0 expiration on a timer that is already disabled, the process wide cputime counter will be started and won't ever get a chance to be stopped by stop_process_timer() since no timer is actually armed to be processed. The following snippet is enough to trigger the issue. void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); timer_delete(id); } 2) If timer_settime() is called with a 0 expiration on a timer that is already armed, the timer is dequeued but not really disarmed. So the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency may still remain a while around. The following code snippet keeps this overhead around for one week after the timer deletion: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; val.it_value.tv_sec = 604800; timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); timer_settime(id, 0, &val, NULL); timer_delete(id); } 3) If the timer was initially deactivated, this call to timer_settime() with an early expiration may have started the process wide cputime counter even though the timer hasn't been queued and armed because it has fired early and inline within posix_cpu_timer_set() itself. As a result the process wide cputime counter may never stop until a new timer is ever armed in the future. The following code snippet can reproduce this: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN); timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); val.it_value.tv_nsec = 1; timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); } 4) If the timer was initially armed with a former expiration value before this call to timer_settime() and the current call sets an early deadline that has already expired, the timer fires inline within posix_cpu_timer_set(). In this case it must have been dequeued before firing inline with its new expiration value, yet it hasn't been disarmed in this case. So the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency may still be around for a while even after the timer fired. The following code snippet can reproduce this: void trigger_process_counter(void) { timer_t id; struct itimerspec val = { }; signal(SIGALRM, SIG_IGN); timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id); val.it_value.tv_sec = 100; timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); val.it_value.tv_sec = 0; val.it_value.tv_nsec = 1; timer_settime(id, TIMER_ABSTIME, &val, NULL); } Fix all these issues with triggering the related base next expiration recalculation on the next tick. This also implies to re-evaluate the need to keep around the process wide cputime counter and the tick dependency, in a similar fashion to disarm_timer(). Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210726125513.271824-7-frederic@kernel.org
2021-07-26 12:55:13 +00:00
if (cpu_timer_queued(ctmr)) {
timerqueue_del(ctmr->head, &ctmr->node);
ctmr->head = NULL;
return true;
}
return false;
}
static inline u64 cpu_timer_getexpires(struct cpu_timer *ctmr)
{
return ctmr->node.expires;
}
static inline void cpu_timer_setexpires(struct cpu_timer *ctmr, u64 exp)
{
ctmr->node.expires = exp;
}
/**
* posix_cputimer_base - Container per posix CPU clock
* @nextevt: Earliest-expiration cache
* @tqhead: timerqueue head for cpu_timers
*/
struct posix_cputimer_base {
u64 nextevt;
struct timerqueue_head tqhead;
};
/**
* posix_cputimers - Container for posix CPU timer related data
* @bases: Base container for posix CPU clocks
* @timers_active: Timers are queued.
* @expiry_active: Timer expiry is active. Used for
* process wide timers to avoid multiple
* task trying to handle expiry concurrently
*
* Used in task_struct and signal_struct
*/
struct posix_cputimers {
struct posix_cputimer_base bases[CPUCLOCK_MAX];
unsigned int timers_active;
unsigned int expiry_active;
};
posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work Running posix CPU timers in hard interrupt context has a few downsides: - For PREEMPT_RT it cannot work as the expiry code needs to take sighand lock, which is a 'sleeping spinlock' in RT. The original RT approach of offloading the posix CPU timer handling into a high priority thread was clumsy and provided no real benefit in general. - For fine grained accounting it's just wrong to run this in context of the timer interrupt because that way a process specific CPU time is accounted to the timer interrupt. - Long running timer interrupts caused by a large amount of expiring timers which can be created and armed by unpriviledged user space. There is no hard requirement to expire them in interrupt context. If the signal is targeted at the task itself then it won't be delivered before the task returns to user space anyway. If the signal is targeted at a supervisor process then it might be slightly delayed, but posix CPU timers are inaccurate anyway due to the fact that they are tied to the tick. Provide infrastructure to schedule task work which allows splitting the posix CPU timer code into a quick check in interrupt context and a thread context expiry and signal delivery function. This has to be enabled by architectures as it requires that the architecture specific KVM implementation handles pending task work before exiting to guest mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200730102337.783470146@linutronix.de
2020-07-30 10:14:06 +00:00
/**
* posix_cputimers_work - Container for task work based posix CPU timer expiry
* @work: The task work to be scheduled
posix-cpu-timers: Implement the missing timer_wait_running callback For some unknown reason the introduction of the timer_wait_running callback missed to fixup posix CPU timers, which went unnoticed for almost four years. Marco reported recently that the WARN_ON() in timer_wait_running() triggers with a posix CPU timer test case. Posix CPU timers have two execution models for expiring timers depending on CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK: 1) If not enabled, the expiry happens in hard interrupt context so spin waiting on the remote CPU is reasonably time bound. Implement an empty stub function for that case. 2) If enabled, the expiry happens in task work before returning to user space or guest mode. The expired timers are marked as firing and moved from the timer queue to a local list head with sighand lock held. Once the timers are moved, sighand lock is dropped and the expiry happens in fully preemptible context. That means the expiring task can be scheduled out, migrated, interrupted etc. So spin waiting on it is more than suboptimal. The timer wheel has a timer_wait_running() mechanism for RT, which uses a per CPU timer-base expiry lock which is held by the expiry code and the task waiting for the timer function to complete blocks on that lock. This does not work in the same way for posix CPU timers as there is no timer base and expiry for process wide timers can run on any task belonging to that process, but the concept of waiting on an expiry lock can be used too in a slightly different way: - Add a mutex to struct posix_cputimers_work. This struct is per task and used to schedule the expiry task work from the timer interrupt. - Add a task_struct pointer to struct cpu_timer which is used to store a the task which runs the expiry. That's filled in when the task moves the expired timers to the local expiry list. That's not affecting the size of the k_itimer union as there are bigger union members already - Let the task take the expiry mutex around the expiry function - Let the waiter acquire a task reference with rcu_read_lock() held and block on the expiry mutex This avoids spin-waiting on a task which might not even be on a CPU and works nicely for RT too. Fixes: ec8f954a40da ("posix-timers: Use a callback for cancel synchronization on PREEMPT_RT") Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zg764ojw.ffs@tglx
2023-04-17 13:37:55 +00:00
* @mutex: Mutex held around expiry in context of this task work
posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work Running posix CPU timers in hard interrupt context has a few downsides: - For PREEMPT_RT it cannot work as the expiry code needs to take sighand lock, which is a 'sleeping spinlock' in RT. The original RT approach of offloading the posix CPU timer handling into a high priority thread was clumsy and provided no real benefit in general. - For fine grained accounting it's just wrong to run this in context of the timer interrupt because that way a process specific CPU time is accounted to the timer interrupt. - Long running timer interrupts caused by a large amount of expiring timers which can be created and armed by unpriviledged user space. There is no hard requirement to expire them in interrupt context. If the signal is targeted at the task itself then it won't be delivered before the task returns to user space anyway. If the signal is targeted at a supervisor process then it might be slightly delayed, but posix CPU timers are inaccurate anyway due to the fact that they are tied to the tick. Provide infrastructure to schedule task work which allows splitting the posix CPU timer code into a quick check in interrupt context and a thread context expiry and signal delivery function. This has to be enabled by architectures as it requires that the architecture specific KVM implementation handles pending task work before exiting to guest mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200730102337.783470146@linutronix.de
2020-07-30 10:14:06 +00:00
* @scheduled: @work has been scheduled already, no further processing
*/
struct posix_cputimers_work {
struct callback_head work;
posix-cpu-timers: Implement the missing timer_wait_running callback For some unknown reason the introduction of the timer_wait_running callback missed to fixup posix CPU timers, which went unnoticed for almost four years. Marco reported recently that the WARN_ON() in timer_wait_running() triggers with a posix CPU timer test case. Posix CPU timers have two execution models for expiring timers depending on CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK: 1) If not enabled, the expiry happens in hard interrupt context so spin waiting on the remote CPU is reasonably time bound. Implement an empty stub function for that case. 2) If enabled, the expiry happens in task work before returning to user space or guest mode. The expired timers are marked as firing and moved from the timer queue to a local list head with sighand lock held. Once the timers are moved, sighand lock is dropped and the expiry happens in fully preemptible context. That means the expiring task can be scheduled out, migrated, interrupted etc. So spin waiting on it is more than suboptimal. The timer wheel has a timer_wait_running() mechanism for RT, which uses a per CPU timer-base expiry lock which is held by the expiry code and the task waiting for the timer function to complete blocks on that lock. This does not work in the same way for posix CPU timers as there is no timer base and expiry for process wide timers can run on any task belonging to that process, but the concept of waiting on an expiry lock can be used too in a slightly different way: - Add a mutex to struct posix_cputimers_work. This struct is per task and used to schedule the expiry task work from the timer interrupt. - Add a task_struct pointer to struct cpu_timer which is used to store a the task which runs the expiry. That's filled in when the task moves the expired timers to the local expiry list. That's not affecting the size of the k_itimer union as there are bigger union members already - Let the task take the expiry mutex around the expiry function - Let the waiter acquire a task reference with rcu_read_lock() held and block on the expiry mutex This avoids spin-waiting on a task which might not even be on a CPU and works nicely for RT too. Fixes: ec8f954a40da ("posix-timers: Use a callback for cancel synchronization on PREEMPT_RT") Reported-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87zg764ojw.ffs@tglx
2023-04-17 13:37:55 +00:00
struct mutex mutex;
posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work Running posix CPU timers in hard interrupt context has a few downsides: - For PREEMPT_RT it cannot work as the expiry code needs to take sighand lock, which is a 'sleeping spinlock' in RT. The original RT approach of offloading the posix CPU timer handling into a high priority thread was clumsy and provided no real benefit in general. - For fine grained accounting it's just wrong to run this in context of the timer interrupt because that way a process specific CPU time is accounted to the timer interrupt. - Long running timer interrupts caused by a large amount of expiring timers which can be created and armed by unpriviledged user space. There is no hard requirement to expire them in interrupt context. If the signal is targeted at the task itself then it won't be delivered before the task returns to user space anyway. If the signal is targeted at a supervisor process then it might be slightly delayed, but posix CPU timers are inaccurate anyway due to the fact that they are tied to the tick. Provide infrastructure to schedule task work which allows splitting the posix CPU timer code into a quick check in interrupt context and a thread context expiry and signal delivery function. This has to be enabled by architectures as it requires that the architecture specific KVM implementation handles pending task work before exiting to guest mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200730102337.783470146@linutronix.de
2020-07-30 10:14:06 +00:00
unsigned int scheduled;
};
static inline void posix_cputimers_init(struct posix_cputimers *pct)
{
memset(pct, 0, sizeof(*pct));
pct->bases[0].nextevt = U64_MAX;
pct->bases[1].nextevt = U64_MAX;
pct->bases[2].nextevt = U64_MAX;
}
void posix_cputimers_group_init(struct posix_cputimers *pct, u64 cpu_limit);
static inline void posix_cputimers_rt_watchdog(struct posix_cputimers *pct,
u64 runtime)
{
pct->bases[CPUCLOCK_SCHED].nextevt = runtime;
}
/* Init task static initializer */
#define INIT_CPU_TIMERBASE(b) { \
.nextevt = U64_MAX, \
}
#define INIT_CPU_TIMERBASES(b) { \
INIT_CPU_TIMERBASE(b[0]), \
INIT_CPU_TIMERBASE(b[1]), \
INIT_CPU_TIMERBASE(b[2]), \
}
#define INIT_CPU_TIMERS(s) \
.posix_cputimers = { \
.bases = INIT_CPU_TIMERBASES(s.posix_cputimers.bases), \
},
#else
struct posix_cputimers { };
struct cpu_timer { };
#define INIT_CPU_TIMERS(s)
static inline void posix_cputimers_init(struct posix_cputimers *pct) { }
static inline void posix_cputimers_group_init(struct posix_cputimers *pct,
u64 cpu_limit) { }
#endif
posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work Running posix CPU timers in hard interrupt context has a few downsides: - For PREEMPT_RT it cannot work as the expiry code needs to take sighand lock, which is a 'sleeping spinlock' in RT. The original RT approach of offloading the posix CPU timer handling into a high priority thread was clumsy and provided no real benefit in general. - For fine grained accounting it's just wrong to run this in context of the timer interrupt because that way a process specific CPU time is accounted to the timer interrupt. - Long running timer interrupts caused by a large amount of expiring timers which can be created and armed by unpriviledged user space. There is no hard requirement to expire them in interrupt context. If the signal is targeted at the task itself then it won't be delivered before the task returns to user space anyway. If the signal is targeted at a supervisor process then it might be slightly delayed, but posix CPU timers are inaccurate anyway due to the fact that they are tied to the tick. Provide infrastructure to schedule task work which allows splitting the posix CPU timer code into a quick check in interrupt context and a thread context expiry and signal delivery function. This has to be enabled by architectures as it requires that the architecture specific KVM implementation handles pending task work before exiting to guest mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200730102337.783470146@linutronix.de
2020-07-30 10:14:06 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK
posix-cpu-timers: Clear task::posix_cputimers_work in copy_process() copy_process currently copies task_struct.posix_cputimers_work as-is. If a timer interrupt arrives while handling clone and before dup_task_struct completes then the child task will have: 1. posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true 2. posix_cputimers_work.work queued. copy_process clears task_struct.task_works, so (2) will have no effect and posix_cpu_timers_work will never run (not to mention it doesn't make sense for two tasks to share a common linked list). Since posix_cpu_timers_work never runs, posix_cputimers_work.scheduled is never cleared. Since scheduled is set, future timer interrupts will skip scheduling work, with the ultimate result that the task will never receive timer expirations. Together, the complete flow is: 1. Task 1 calls clone(), enters kernel. 2. Timer interrupt fires, schedules task work on Task 1. 2a. task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true 2b. task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.work added to task_struct.task_works. 3. dup_task_struct() copies Task 1 to Task 2. 4. copy_process() clears task_struct.task_works for Task 2. 5. Future timer interrupts on Task 2 see task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true and skip scheduling work. Fix this by explicitly clearing contents of task_struct.posix_cputimers_work in copy_process(). This was never meant to be shared or inherited across tasks in the first place. Fixes: 1fb497dd0030 ("posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work") Reported-by: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv> Signed-off-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211101210615.716522-1-mpratt@google.com
2021-11-01 21:06:15 +00:00
void clear_posix_cputimers_work(struct task_struct *p);
posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work Running posix CPU timers in hard interrupt context has a few downsides: - For PREEMPT_RT it cannot work as the expiry code needs to take sighand lock, which is a 'sleeping spinlock' in RT. The original RT approach of offloading the posix CPU timer handling into a high priority thread was clumsy and provided no real benefit in general. - For fine grained accounting it's just wrong to run this in context of the timer interrupt because that way a process specific CPU time is accounted to the timer interrupt. - Long running timer interrupts caused by a large amount of expiring timers which can be created and armed by unpriviledged user space. There is no hard requirement to expire them in interrupt context. If the signal is targeted at the task itself then it won't be delivered before the task returns to user space anyway. If the signal is targeted at a supervisor process then it might be slightly delayed, but posix CPU timers are inaccurate anyway due to the fact that they are tied to the tick. Provide infrastructure to schedule task work which allows splitting the posix CPU timer code into a quick check in interrupt context and a thread context expiry and signal delivery function. This has to be enabled by architectures as it requires that the architecture specific KVM implementation handles pending task work before exiting to guest mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200730102337.783470146@linutronix.de
2020-07-30 10:14:06 +00:00
void posix_cputimers_init_work(void);
#else
posix-cpu-timers: Clear task::posix_cputimers_work in copy_process() copy_process currently copies task_struct.posix_cputimers_work as-is. If a timer interrupt arrives while handling clone and before dup_task_struct completes then the child task will have: 1. posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true 2. posix_cputimers_work.work queued. copy_process clears task_struct.task_works, so (2) will have no effect and posix_cpu_timers_work will never run (not to mention it doesn't make sense for two tasks to share a common linked list). Since posix_cpu_timers_work never runs, posix_cputimers_work.scheduled is never cleared. Since scheduled is set, future timer interrupts will skip scheduling work, with the ultimate result that the task will never receive timer expirations. Together, the complete flow is: 1. Task 1 calls clone(), enters kernel. 2. Timer interrupt fires, schedules task work on Task 1. 2a. task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true 2b. task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.work added to task_struct.task_works. 3. dup_task_struct() copies Task 1 to Task 2. 4. copy_process() clears task_struct.task_works for Task 2. 5. Future timer interrupts on Task 2 see task_struct.posix_cputimers_work.scheduled = true and skip scheduling work. Fix this by explicitly clearing contents of task_struct.posix_cputimers_work in copy_process(). This was never meant to be shared or inherited across tasks in the first place. Fixes: 1fb497dd0030 ("posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work") Reported-by: Rhys Hiltner <rhys@justin.tv> Signed-off-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211101210615.716522-1-mpratt@google.com
2021-11-01 21:06:15 +00:00
static inline void clear_posix_cputimers_work(struct task_struct *p) { }
posix-cpu-timers: Provide mechanisms to defer timer handling to task_work Running posix CPU timers in hard interrupt context has a few downsides: - For PREEMPT_RT it cannot work as the expiry code needs to take sighand lock, which is a 'sleeping spinlock' in RT. The original RT approach of offloading the posix CPU timer handling into a high priority thread was clumsy and provided no real benefit in general. - For fine grained accounting it's just wrong to run this in context of the timer interrupt because that way a process specific CPU time is accounted to the timer interrupt. - Long running timer interrupts caused by a large amount of expiring timers which can be created and armed by unpriviledged user space. There is no hard requirement to expire them in interrupt context. If the signal is targeted at the task itself then it won't be delivered before the task returns to user space anyway. If the signal is targeted at a supervisor process then it might be slightly delayed, but posix CPU timers are inaccurate anyway due to the fact that they are tied to the tick. Provide infrastructure to schedule task work which allows splitting the posix CPU timer code into a quick check in interrupt context and a thread context expiry and signal delivery function. This has to be enabled by architectures as it requires that the architecture specific KVM implementation handles pending task work before exiting to guest mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200730102337.783470146@linutronix.de
2020-07-30 10:14:06 +00:00
static inline void posix_cputimers_init_work(void) { }
#endif
#define REQUEUE_PENDING 1
/**
* struct k_itimer - POSIX.1b interval timer structure.
* @list: List head for binding the timer to signals->posix_timers
* @t_hash: Entry in the posix timer hash table
* @it_lock: Lock protecting the timer
* @kclock: Pointer to the k_clock struct handling this timer
* @it_clock: The posix timer clock id
* @it_id: The posix timer id for identifying the timer
* @it_active: Marker that timer is active
* @it_overrun: The overrun counter for pending signals
* @it_overrun_last: The overrun at the time of the last delivered signal
* @it_requeue_pending: Indicator that timer waits for being requeued on
* signal delivery
* @it_sigev_notify: The notify word of sigevent struct for signal delivery
* @it_interval: The interval for periodic timers
* @it_signal: Pointer to the creators signal struct
* @it_pid: The pid of the process/task targeted by the signal
* @it_process: The task to wakeup on clock_nanosleep (CPU timers)
* @sigq: Pointer to preallocated sigqueue
* @it: Union representing the various posix timer type
* internals.
* @rcu: RCU head for freeing the timer.
*/
struct k_itimer {
struct list_head list;
struct hlist_node t_hash;
spinlock_t it_lock;
const struct k_clock *kclock;
clockid_t it_clock;
timer_t it_id;
int it_active;
s64 it_overrun;
s64 it_overrun_last;
int it_requeue_pending;
int it_sigev_notify;
ktime_t it_interval;
struct signal_struct *it_signal;
union {
struct pid *it_pid;
struct task_struct *it_process;
};
struct sigqueue *sigq;
union {
struct {
struct hrtimer timer;
} real;
struct cpu_timer cpu;
struct {
struct alarm alarmtimer;
} alarm;
} it;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
void run_posix_cpu_timers(void);
void posix_cpu_timers_exit(struct task_struct *task);
void posix_cpu_timers_exit_group(struct task_struct *task);
void set_process_cpu_timer(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int clock_idx,
u64 *newval, u64 *oldval);
prlimit: do not grab the tasklist_lock Unnecessarily grabbing the tasklist_lock can be a scalability bottleneck for workloads that also must grab the tasklist_lock for waiting, killing, and cloning. The tasklist_lock was grabbed to protect tsk->sighand from disappearing (becoming NULL). tsk->signal was already protected by holding a reference to tsk. update_rlimit_cpu() assumed tsk->sighand != NULL. With this commit, it attempts to lock_task_sighand(). However, this means that update_rlimit_cpu() can fail. This only happens when a task is exiting. Note that during exec, sighand may *change*, but it will not be NULL. Prior to this commit, the do_prlimit() ensured that update_rlimit_cpu() would not fail by read locking the tasklist_lock and checking tsk->sighand != NULL. If update_rlimit_cpu() fails, there may be other tasks that are not exiting that share tsk->signal. However, the group_leader is the last task to be released, so if we cannot update_rlimit_cpu(group_leader), then the entire process is exiting. The only other caller of update_rlimit_cpu() is selinux_bprm_committing_creds(). It has tsk == current, so update_rlimit_cpu() cannot fail (current->sighand cannot disappear until current exits). This change resulted in a 14% speedup on a microbenchmark where parents kill and wait on their children, and children getpriority, setpriority, and getrlimit. Signed-off-by: Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220106172041.522167-4-brho@google.com Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
2022-01-06 17:20:41 +00:00
int update_rlimit_cpu(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long rlim_new);
timers: fix itimer/many thread hang Overview This patch reworks the handling of POSIX CPU timers, including the ITIMER_PROF, ITIMER_VIRT timers and rlimit handling. It was put together with the help of Roland McGrath, the owner and original writer of this code. The problem we ran into, and the reason for this rework, has to do with using a profiling timer in a process with a large number of threads. It appears that the performance of the old implementation of run_posix_cpu_timers() was at least O(n*3) (where "n" is the number of threads in a process) or worse. Everything is fine with an increasing number of threads until the time taken for that routine to run becomes the same as or greater than the tick time, at which point things degrade rather quickly. This patch fixes bug 9906, "Weird hang with NPTL and SIGPROF." Code Changes This rework corrects the implementation of run_posix_cpu_timers() to make it run in constant time for a particular machine. (Performance may vary between one machine and another depending upon whether the kernel is built as single- or multiprocessor and, in the latter case, depending upon the number of running processors.) To do this, at each tick we now update fields in signal_struct as well as task_struct. The run_posix_cpu_timers() function uses those fields to make its decisions. We define a new structure, "task_cputime," to contain user, system and scheduler times and use these in appropriate places: struct task_cputime { cputime_t utime; cputime_t stime; unsigned long long sum_exec_runtime; }; This is included in the structure "thread_group_cputime," which is a new substructure of signal_struct and which varies for uniprocessor versus multiprocessor kernels. For uniprocessor kernels, it uses "task_cputime" as a simple substructure, while for multiprocessor kernels it is a pointer: struct thread_group_cputime { struct task_cputime totals; }; struct thread_group_cputime { struct task_cputime *totals; }; We also add a new task_cputime substructure directly to signal_struct, to cache the earliest expiration of process-wide timers, and task_cputime also replaces the it_*_expires fields of task_struct (used for earliest expiration of thread timers). The "thread_group_cputime" structure contains process-wide timers that are updated via account_user_time() and friends. In the non-SMP case the structure is a simple aggregator; unfortunately in the SMP case that simplicity was not achievable due to cache-line contention between CPUs (in one measured case performance was actually _worse_ on a 16-cpu system than the same test on a 4-cpu system, due to this contention). For SMP, the thread_group_cputime counters are maintained as a per-cpu structure allocated using alloc_percpu(). The timer functions update only the timer field in the structure corresponding to the running CPU, obtained using per_cpu_ptr(). We define a set of inline functions in sched.h that we use to maintain the thread_group_cputime structure and hide the differences between UP and SMP implementations from the rest of the kernel. The thread_group_cputime_init() function initializes the thread_group_cputime structure for the given task. The thread_group_cputime_alloc() is a no-op for UP; for SMP it calls the out-of-line function thread_group_cputime_alloc_smp() to allocate and fill in the per-cpu structures and fields. The thread_group_cputime_free() function, also a no-op for UP, in SMP frees the per-cpu structures. The thread_group_cputime_clone_thread() function (also a UP no-op) for SMP calls thread_group_cputime_alloc() if the per-cpu structures haven't yet been allocated. The thread_group_cputime() function fills the task_cputime structure it is passed with the contents of the thread_group_cputime fields; in UP it's that simple but in SMP it must also safely check that tsk->signal is non-NULL (if it is it just uses the appropriate fields of task_struct) and, if so, sums the per-cpu values for each online CPU. Finally, the three functions account_group_user_time(), account_group_system_time() and account_group_exec_runtime() are used by timer functions to update the respective fields of the thread_group_cputime structure. Non-SMP operation is trivial and will not be mentioned further. The per-cpu structure is always allocated when a task creates its first new thread, via a call to thread_group_cputime_clone_thread() from copy_signal(). It is freed at process exit via a call to thread_group_cputime_free() from cleanup_signal(). All functions that formerly summed utime/stime/sum_sched_runtime values from from all threads in the thread group now use thread_group_cputime() to snapshot the values in the thread_group_cputime structure or the values in the task structure itself if the per-cpu structure hasn't been allocated. Finally, the code in kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c has changed quite a bit. The run_posix_cpu_timers() function has been split into a fast path and a slow path; the former safely checks whether there are any expired thread timers and, if not, just returns, while the slow path does the heavy lifting. With the dedicated thread group fields, timers are no longer "rebalanced" and the process_timer_rebalance() function and related code has gone away. All summing loops are gone and all code that used them now uses the thread_group_cputime() inline. When process-wide timers are set, the new task_cputime structure in signal_struct is used to cache the earliest expiration; this is checked in the fast path. Performance The fix appears not to add significant overhead to existing operations. It generally performs the same as the current code except in two cases, one in which it performs slightly worse (Case 5 below) and one in which it performs very significantly better (Case 2 below). Overall it's a wash except in those two cases. I've since done somewhat more involved testing on a dual-core Opteron system. Case 1: With no itimer running, for a test with 100,000 threads, the fixed kernel took 1428.5 seconds, 513 seconds more than the unfixed system, all of which was spent in the system. There were twice as many voluntary context switches with the fix as without it. Case 2: With an itimer running at .01 second ticks and 4000 threads (the most an unmodified kernel can handle), the fixed kernel ran the test in eight percent of the time (5.8 seconds as opposed to 70 seconds) and had better tick accuracy (.012 seconds per tick as opposed to .023 seconds per tick). Case 3: A 4000-thread test with an initial timer tick of .01 second and an interval of 10,000 seconds (i.e. a timer that ticks only once) had very nearly the same performance in both cases: 6.3 seconds elapsed for the fixed kernel versus 5.5 seconds for the unfixed kernel. With fewer threads (eight in these tests), the Case 1 test ran in essentially the same time on both the modified and unmodified kernels (5.2 seconds versus 5.8 seconds). The Case 2 test ran in about the same time as well, 5.9 seconds versus 5.4 seconds but again with much better tick accuracy, .013 seconds per tick versus .025 seconds per tick for the unmodified kernel. Since the fix affected the rlimit code, I also tested soft and hard CPU limits. Case 4: With a hard CPU limit of 20 seconds and eight threads (and an itimer running), the modified kernel was very slightly favored in that while it killed the process in 19.997 seconds of CPU time (5.002 seconds of wall time), only .003 seconds of that was system time, the rest was user time. The unmodified kernel killed the process in 20.001 seconds of CPU (5.014 seconds of wall time) of which .016 seconds was system time. Really, though, the results were too close to call. The results were essentially the same with no itimer running. Case 5: With a soft limit of 20 seconds and a hard limit of 2000 seconds (where the hard limit would never be reached) and an itimer running, the modified kernel exhibited worse tick accuracy than the unmodified kernel: .050 seconds/tick versus .028 seconds/tick. Otherwise, performance was almost indistinguishable. With no itimer running this test exhibited virtually identical behavior and times in both cases. In times past I did some limited performance testing. those results are below. On a four-cpu Opteron system without this fix, a sixteen-thread test executed in 3569.991 seconds, of which user was 3568.435s and system was 1.556s. On the same system with the fix, user and elapsed time were about the same, but system time dropped to 0.007 seconds. Performance with eight, four and one thread were comparable. Interestingly, the timer ticks with the fix seemed more accurate: The sixteen-thread test with the fix received 149543 ticks for 0.024 seconds per tick, while the same test without the fix received 58720 for 0.061 seconds per tick. Both cases were configured for an interval of 0.01 seconds. Again, the other tests were comparable. Each thread in this test computed the primes up to 25,000,000. I also did a test with a large number of threads, 100,000 threads, which is impossible without the fix. In this case each thread computed the primes only up to 10,000 (to make the runtime manageable). System time dominated, at 1546.968 seconds out of a total 2176.906 seconds (giving a user time of 629.938s). It received 147651 ticks for 0.015 seconds per tick, still quite accurate. There is obviously no comparable test without the fix. Signed-off-by: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@google.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-09-12 16:54:39 +00:00
void posixtimer_rearm(struct kernel_siginfo *info);
#endif