linux-stable/lib/kunit/kunit-test.c

486 lines
12 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* KUnit test for core test infrastructure.
*
* Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC.
* Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
*/
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include "try-catch-impl.h"
struct kunit_try_catch_test_context {
struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch;
bool function_called;
};
static void kunit_test_successful_try(void *data)
{
struct kunit *test = data;
struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
ctx->function_called = true;
}
static void kunit_test_no_catch(void *data)
{
struct kunit *test = data;
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Catch should not be called\n");
}
static void kunit_test_try_catch_successful_try_no_catch(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = ctx->try_catch;
kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch,
test,
kunit_test_successful_try,
kunit_test_no_catch);
kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, test);
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx->function_called);
}
static void kunit_test_unsuccessful_try(void *data)
{
struct kunit *test = data;
struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = ctx->try_catch;
kunit_try_catch_throw(try_catch);
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "This line should never be reached\n");
}
static void kunit_test_catch(void *data)
{
struct kunit *test = data;
struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
ctx->function_called = true;
}
static void kunit_test_try_catch_unsuccessful_try_does_catch(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx = test->priv;
struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch = ctx->try_catch;
kunit_try_catch_init(try_catch,
test,
kunit_test_unsuccessful_try,
kunit_test_catch);
kunit_try_catch_run(try_catch, test);
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, ctx->function_called);
}
static int kunit_try_catch_test_init(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx;
ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
test->priv = ctx;
ctx->try_catch = kunit_kmalloc(test,
sizeof(*ctx->try_catch),
GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx->try_catch);
return 0;
}
static struct kunit_case kunit_try_catch_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_try_catch_successful_try_no_catch),
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_test_try_catch_unsuccessful_try_does_catch),
{}
};
static struct kunit_suite kunit_try_catch_test_suite = {
.name = "kunit-try-catch-test",
.init = kunit_try_catch_test_init,
.test_cases = kunit_try_catch_test_cases,
};
/*
* Context for testing test managed resources
* is_resource_initialized is used to test arbitrary resources
*/
struct kunit_test_resource_context {
struct kunit test;
bool is_resource_initialized;
int allocate_order[2];
int free_order[2];
};
static int fake_resource_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = context;
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
res->data = &ctx->is_resource_initialized;
ctx->is_resource_initialized = true;
return 0;
}
static void fake_resource_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
{
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
bool *is_resource_initialized = res->data;
*is_resource_initialized = false;
}
static void kunit_resource_test_init_resources(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
kunit_init_test(&ctx->test, "testing_test_init_test", NULL);
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&ctx->test.resources));
}
static void kunit_resource_test_alloc_resource(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
struct kunit_resource *res;
kunit_resource_free_t free = fake_resource_free;
res = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test,
fake_resource_init,
fake_resource_free,
GFP_KERNEL,
ctx);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, res);
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test,
&ctx->is_resource_initialized,
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
(bool *)res->data);
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_last(&res->node, &ctx->test.resources));
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, free, res->free);
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
kunit_put_resource(res);
}
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
/*
* Note: tests below use kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(), so as a consequence
* they have a reference to the associated resource that they must release
* via kunit_put_resource(). In normal operation, users will only
* have to do this for cases where they use kunit_find_resource(), and the
* kunit_alloc_resource() function will be used (which does not take a
* resource reference).
*/
static void kunit_resource_test_destroy_resource(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
struct kunit_resource *res = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(
&ctx->test,
fake_resource_init,
fake_resource_free,
GFP_KERNEL,
ctx);
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
kunit_put_resource(res);
KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test,
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
kunit_destroy_resource(&ctx->test,
kunit_resource_instance_match,
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
res->data));
KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, ctx->is_resource_initialized);
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&ctx->test.resources));
}
static void kunit_resource_test_cleanup_resources(struct kunit *test)
{
int i;
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
struct kunit_resource *resources[5];
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(resources); i++) {
resources[i] = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test,
fake_resource_init,
fake_resource_free,
GFP_KERNEL,
ctx);
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
kunit_put_resource(resources[i]);
}
kunit_cleanup(&ctx->test);
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&ctx->test.resources));
}
static void kunit_resource_test_mark_order(int order_array[],
size_t order_size,
int key)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < order_size && order_array[i]; i++)
;
order_array[i] = key;
}
#define KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, order_field, key) \
kunit_resource_test_mark_order(ctx->order_field, \
ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->order_field), \
key)
static int fake_resource_2_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = context;
KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, allocate_order, 2);
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
res->data = ctx;
return 0;
}
static void fake_resource_2_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
{
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = res->data;
KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, free_order, 2);
}
static int fake_resource_1_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = context;
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
struct kunit_resource *res2;
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
res2 = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test,
fake_resource_2_init,
fake_resource_2_free,
GFP_KERNEL,
ctx);
KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, allocate_order, 1);
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
res->data = ctx;
kunit_put_resource(res2);
return 0;
}
static void fake_resource_1_free(struct kunit_resource *res)
{
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = res->data;
KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, free_order, 1);
}
/*
* TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): replace the arrays that keep track of the
* order of allocation and freeing with strict mocks using the IN_SEQUENCE macro
* to assert allocation and freeing order when the feature becomes available.
*/
static void kunit_resource_test_proper_free_ordering(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
struct kunit_resource *res;
/* fake_resource_1 allocates a fake_resource_2 in its init. */
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
res = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test,
fake_resource_1_init,
fake_resource_1_free,
GFP_KERNEL,
ctx);
/*
* Since fake_resource_2_init calls KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER
* before returning to fake_resource_1_init, it should be the first to
* put its key in the allocate_order array.
*/
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->allocate_order[0], 2);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->allocate_order[1], 1);
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
kunit_put_resource(res);
kunit_cleanup(&ctx->test);
/*
* Because fake_resource_2 finishes allocation before fake_resource_1,
* fake_resource_1 should be freed first since it could depend on
* fake_resource_2.
*/
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->free_order[0], 1);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->free_order[1], 2);
}
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
static void kunit_resource_test_static(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context ctx;
struct kunit_resource res;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kunit_add_resource(test, NULL, NULL, &res, &ctx),
0);
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res.data, (void *)&ctx);
kunit_cleanup(test);
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&test->resources));
}
static void kunit_resource_test_named(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_resource res1, res2, *found = NULL;
struct kunit_test_resource_context ctx;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
kunit_add_named_resource(test, NULL, NULL, &res1,
"resource_1", &ctx),
0);
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, res1.data, (void *)&ctx);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
kunit_add_named_resource(test, NULL, NULL, &res1,
"resource_1", &ctx),
-EEXIST);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
kunit_add_named_resource(test, NULL, NULL, &res2,
"resource_2", &ctx),
0);
found = kunit_find_named_resource(test, "resource_1");
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, found, &res1);
if (found)
kunit_put_resource(&res1);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, kunit_destroy_named_resource(test, "resource_2"),
0);
kunit_cleanup(test);
KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&test->resources));
}
static int kunit_resource_test_init(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx =
kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx);
test->priv = ctx;
kunit_init_test(&ctx->test, "test_test_context", NULL);
return 0;
}
static void kunit_resource_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv;
kunit_cleanup(&ctx->test);
kfree(ctx);
}
static struct kunit_case kunit_resource_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_init_resources),
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_alloc_resource),
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_destroy_resource),
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_cleanup_resources),
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_proper_free_ordering),
kunit: generalize kunit_resource API beyond allocated resources In its original form, the kunit resources API - consisting the struct kunit_resource and associated functions - was focused on adding allocated resources during test operation that would be automatically cleaned up on test completion. The recent RFC patch proposing converting KASAN tests to KUnit [1] showed another potential model - where outside of test context, but with a pointer to the test state, we wish to access/update test-related data, but expressly want to avoid allocations. It turns out we can generalize the kunit_resource to support static resources where the struct kunit_resource * is passed in and initialized for us. As part of this work, we also change the "allocation" field to the more general "data" name, as instead of associating an allocation, we can associate a pointer to static data. Static data is distinguished by a NULL free functions. A test is added to cover using kunit_add_resource() with a static resource and data. Finally we also make use of the kernel's krefcount interfaces to manage reference counting of KUnit resources. The motivation for this is simple; if we have kernel threads accessing and using resources (say via kunit_find_resource()) we need to ensure we do not remove said resources (or indeed free them if they were dynamically allocated) until the reference count reaches zero. A new function - kunit_put_resource() - is added to handle this, and it should be called after a thread using kunit_find_resource() is finished with the retrieved resource. We ensure that the functions needed to look up, use and drop reference count are "static inline"-defined so that they can be used by builtin code as well as modules in the case that KUnit is built as a module. A cosmetic change here also; I've tried moving to kunit_[action]_resource() as the format of function names for consistency and readability. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/2/26/1286 Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-05-29 21:46:20 +00:00
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_static),
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_named),
{}
};
static struct kunit_suite kunit_resource_test_suite = {
.name = "kunit-resource-test",
.init = kunit_resource_test_init,
.exit = kunit_resource_test_exit,
.test_cases = kunit_resource_test_cases,
};
static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test);
static struct kunit_case kunit_log_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_log_test),
{}
};
static struct kunit_suite kunit_log_test_suite = {
.name = "kunit-log-test",
.test_cases = kunit_log_test_cases,
};
static void kunit_log_test(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit_suite suite;
suite.log = kunit_kzalloc(test, KUNIT_LOG_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, suite.log);
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, "put this in log.");
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, "this too.");
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &suite, "add to suite log.");
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &suite, "along with this.");
#ifdef CONFIG_KUNIT_DEBUGFS
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
strstr(test->log, "put this in log."));
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
strstr(test->log, "this too."));
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
strstr(suite.log, "add to suite log."));
KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test,
strstr(suite.log, "along with this."));
#else
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, test->log, (char *)NULL);
#endif
}
static void kunit_status_set_failure_test(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit fake;
kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SUCCESS);
kunit_set_failure(&fake);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_FAILURE);
}
static void kunit_status_mark_skipped_test(struct kunit *test)
{
struct kunit fake;
kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL);
/* Before: Should be SUCCESS with no comment. */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, "");
/* Mark the test as skipped. */
kunit_mark_skipped(&fake, "Accepts format string: %s", "YES");
/* After: Should be SKIPPED with our comment. */
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake.status, (enum kunit_status)KUNIT_SKIPPED);
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, fake.status_comment, "Accepts format string: YES");
}
static struct kunit_case kunit_status_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_set_failure_test),
KUNIT_CASE(kunit_status_mark_skipped_test),
{}
};
static struct kunit_suite kunit_status_test_suite = {
.name = "kunit_status",
.test_cases = kunit_status_test_cases,
};
kunit_test_suites(&kunit_try_catch_test_suite, &kunit_resource_test_suite,
&kunit_log_test_suite, &kunit_status_test_suite);
kunit: allow kunit tests to be loaded as a module As tests are added to kunit, it will become less feasible to execute all built tests together. By supporting modular tests we provide a simple way to do selective execution on a running system; specifying CONFIG_KUNIT=y CONFIG_KUNIT_EXAMPLE_TEST=m ...means we can simply "insmod example-test.ko" to run the tests. To achieve this we need to do the following: o export the required symbols in kunit o string-stream tests utilize non-exported symbols so for now we skip building them when CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m. o drivers/base/power/qos-test.c contains a few unexported interface references, namely freq_qos_read_value() and freq_constraints_init(). Both of these could be potentially defined as static inline functions in include/linux/pm_qos.h, but for now we simply avoid supporting module build for that test suite. o support a new way of declaring test suites. Because a module cannot do multiple late_initcall()s, we provide a kunit_test_suites() macro to declare multiple suites within the same module at once. o some test module names would have been too general ("test-test" and "example-test" for kunit tests, "inode-test" for ext4 tests); rename these as appropriate ("kunit-test", "kunit-example-test" and "ext4-inode-test" respectively). Also define kunit_test_suite() via kunit_test_suites() as callers in other trees may need the old definition. Co-developed-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Acked-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> # for ext4 bits Acked-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> # For list-test Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-01-06 22:28:20 +00:00
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");