linux-stable/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c

573 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Intel CPU Microcode Update Driver for Linux
*
* Copyright (C) 2000-2006 Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
* 2006 Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
*
* This driver allows to upgrade microcode on Intel processors
* belonging to IA-32 family - PentiumPro, Pentium II,
* Pentium III, Xeon, Pentium 4, etc.
*
* Reference: Section 8.11 of Volume 3a, IA-32 Intel? Architecture
* Software Developer's Manual
* Order Number 253668 or free download from:
*
* http://developer.intel.com/Assets/PDF/manual/253668.pdf
*
* For more information, go to http://www.urbanmyth.org/microcode
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* 1.0 16 Feb 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.com>
* Initial release.
* 1.01 18 Feb 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.com>
* Added read() support + cleanups.
* 1.02 21 Feb 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.com>
* Added 'device trimming' support. open(O_WRONLY) zeroes
* and frees the saved copy of applied microcode.
* 1.03 29 Feb 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@sco.com>
* Made to use devfs (/dev/cpu/microcode) + cleanups.
* 1.04 06 Jun 2000, Simon Trimmer <simon@veritas.com>
* Added misc device support (now uses both devfs and misc).
* Added MICROCODE_IOCFREE ioctl to clear memory.
* 1.05 09 Jun 2000, Simon Trimmer <simon@veritas.com>
* Messages for error cases (non Intel & no suitable microcode).
* 1.06 03 Aug 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>
* Removed ->release(). Removed exclusive open and status bitmap.
* Added microcode_rwsem to serialize read()/write()/ioctl().
* Removed global kernel lock usage.
* 1.07 07 Sep 2000, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>
* Write 0 to 0x8B msr and then cpuid before reading revision,
* so that it works even if there were no update done by the
* BIOS. Otherwise, reading from 0x8B gives junk (which happened
* to be 0 on my machine which is why it worked even when I
* disabled update by the BIOS)
* Thanks to Eric W. Biederman <ebiederman@lnxi.com> for the fix.
* 1.08 11 Dec 2000, Richard Schaal <richard.schaal@intel.com> and
* Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>
* Intel Pentium 4 processor support and bugfixes.
* 1.09 30 Oct 2001, Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>
* Bugfix for HT (Hyper-Threading) enabled processors
* whereby processor resources are shared by all logical processors
* in a single CPU package.
* 1.10 28 Feb 2002 Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com> and
* Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>,
* Serialize updates as required on HT processors due to
* speculative nature of implementation.
* 1.11 22 Mar 2002 Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>
* Fix the panic when writing zero-length microcode chunk.
* 1.12 29 Sep 2003 Nitin Kamble <nitin.a.kamble@intel.com>,
* Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
* Support for the microcode updates in the new format.
* 1.13 10 Oct 2003 Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>
* Removed ->read() method and obsoleted MICROCODE_IOCFREE ioctl
* because we no longer hold a copy of applied microcode
* in kernel memory.
* 1.14 25 Jun 2004 Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>
* Fix sigmatch() macro to handle old CPUs with pf == 0.
* Thanks to Stuart Swales for pointing out this bug.
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <asm/microcode.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Microcode Update Driver");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
#define MICROCODE_VERSION "2.00"
static struct microcode_ops *microcode_ops;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
/*
* Synchronization.
*
* All non cpu-hotplug-callback call sites use:
*
* - microcode_mutex to synchronize with each other;
* - get/put_online_cpus() to synchronize with
* the cpu-hotplug-callback call sites.
*
* We guarantee that only a single cpu is being
* updated at any particular moment of time.
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(microcode_mutex);
struct ucode_cpu_info ucode_cpu_info[NR_CPUS];
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ucode_cpu_info);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
/*
* Operations that are run on a target cpu:
*/
struct cpu_info_ctx {
struct cpu_signature *cpu_sig;
int err;
};
static void collect_cpu_info_local(void *arg)
{
struct cpu_info_ctx *ctx = arg;
ctx->err = microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(smp_processor_id(),
ctx->cpu_sig);
}
static int collect_cpu_info_on_target(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *cpu_sig)
{
struct cpu_info_ctx ctx = { .cpu_sig = cpu_sig, .err = 0 };
int ret;
ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, collect_cpu_info_local, &ctx, 1);
if (!ret)
ret = ctx.err;
return ret;
}
static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
int ret;
memset(uci, 0, sizeof(*uci));
ret = collect_cpu_info_on_target(cpu, &uci->cpu_sig);
if (!ret)
uci->valid = 1;
return ret;
}
struct apply_microcode_ctx {
int err;
};
static void apply_microcode_local(void *arg)
{
struct apply_microcode_ctx *ctx = arg;
ctx->err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(smp_processor_id());
}
static int apply_microcode_on_target(int cpu)
{
struct apply_microcode_ctx ctx = { .err = 0 };
int ret;
ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, apply_microcode_local, &ctx, 1);
if (!ret)
ret = ctx.err;
return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MICROCODE_OLD_INTERFACE
static int do_microcode_update(const void __user *buf, size_t size)
{
int error = 0;
int cpu;
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
enum ucode_state ustate;
if (!uci->valid)
continue;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_user(cpu, buf, size);
if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR) {
error = -1;
break;
} else if (ustate == UCODE_OK)
apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return error;
}
static int microcode_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
return capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ? nonseekable_open(inode, file) : -EPERM;
}
static ssize_t microcode_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t len, loff_t *ppos)
{
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
if ((len >> PAGE_SHIFT) > totalram_pages) {
pr_err("too much data (max %ld pages)\n", totalram_pages);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return ret;
}
get_online_cpus();
mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
if (do_microcode_update(buf, len) == 0)
ret = (ssize_t)len;
mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
put_online_cpus();
return ret;
}
static const struct file_operations microcode_fops = {
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.write = microcode_write,
.open = microcode_open,
llseek: automatically add .llseek fop All file_operations should get a .llseek operation so we can make nonseekable_open the default for future file operations without a .llseek pointer. The three cases that we can automatically detect are no_llseek, seq_lseek and default_llseek. For cases where we can we can automatically prove that the file offset is always ignored, we use noop_llseek, which maintains the current behavior of not returning an error from a seek. New drivers should normally not use noop_llseek but instead use no_llseek and call nonseekable_open at open time. Existing drivers can be converted to do the same when the maintainer knows for certain that no user code relies on calling seek on the device file. The generated code is often incorrectly indented and right now contains comments that clarify for each added line why a specific variant was chosen. In the version that gets submitted upstream, the comments will be gone and I will manually fix the indentation, because there does not seem to be a way to do that using coccinelle. Some amount of new code is currently sitting in linux-next that should get the same modifications, which I will do at the end of the merge window. Many thanks to Julia Lawall for helping me learn to write a semantic patch that does all this. ===== begin semantic patch ===== // This adds an llseek= method to all file operations, // as a preparation for making no_llseek the default. // // The rules are // - use no_llseek explicitly if we do nonseekable_open // - use seq_lseek for sequential files // - use default_llseek if we know we access f_pos // - use noop_llseek if we know we don't access f_pos, // but we still want to allow users to call lseek // @ open1 exists @ identifier nested_open; @@ nested_open(...) { <+... nonseekable_open(...) ...+> } @ open exists@ identifier open_f; identifier i, f; identifier open1.nested_open; @@ int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f) { <+... ( nonseekable_open(...) | nested_open(...) ) ...+> } @ read disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ read_no_fpos disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ write @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ write_no_fpos @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ fops0 @ identifier fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... }; @ has_llseek depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier llseek_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .llseek = llseek_f, ... }; @ has_read depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... }; @ has_write depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... }; @ has_open depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... }; // use no_llseek if we call nonseekable_open //////////////////////////////////////////// @ nonseekable1 depends on !has_llseek && has_open @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier nso ~= "nonseekable_open"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = nso, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* nonseekable */ }; @ nonseekable2 depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open.open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* open uses nonseekable */ }; // use seq_lseek for sequential files ///////////////////////////////////// @ seq depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier sr ~= "seq_read"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = sr, ... +.llseek = seq_lseek, /* we have seq_read */ }; // use default_llseek if there is a readdir /////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops1 depends on !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier readdir_e; @@ // any other fop is used that changes pos struct file_operations fops = { ... .readdir = readdir_e, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* readdir is present */ }; // use default_llseek if at least one of read/write touches f_pos ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops2 depends on !fops1 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read.read_f; @@ // read fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* read accesses f_pos */ }; @ fops3 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... + .llseek = default_llseek, /* write accesses f_pos */ }; // Use noop_llseek if neither read nor write accesses f_pos /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops4 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !fops3 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read and write both use no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_write && !has_read && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* write uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on !has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* no read or write fn */ }; ===== End semantic patch ===== Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
2010-08-15 16:52:59 +00:00
.llseek = no_llseek,
};
static struct miscdevice microcode_dev = {
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
.minor = MICROCODE_MINOR,
.name = "microcode",
.nodename = "cpu/microcode",
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
.fops = &microcode_fops,
};
static int __init microcode_dev_init(void)
{
int error;
error = misc_register(&microcode_dev);
if (error) {
pr_err("can't misc_register on minor=%d\n", MICROCODE_MINOR);
return error;
}
return 0;
}
static void microcode_dev_exit(void)
{
misc_deregister(&microcode_dev);
}
MODULE_ALIAS_MISCDEV(MICROCODE_MINOR);
driver core: add devname module aliases to allow module on-demand auto-loading This adds: alias: devname:<name> to some common kernel modules, which will allow the on-demand loading of the kernel module when the device node is accessed. Ideally all these modules would be compiled-in, but distros seems too much in love with their modularization that we need to cover the common cases with this new facility. It will allow us to remove a bunch of pretty useless init scripts and modprobes from init scripts. The static device node aliases will be carried in the module itself. The program depmod will extract this information to a file in the module directory: $ cat /lib/modules/2.6.34-00650-g537b60d-dirty/modules.devname # Device nodes to trigger on-demand module loading. microcode cpu/microcode c10:184 fuse fuse c10:229 ppp_generic ppp c108:0 tun net/tun c10:200 dm_mod mapper/control c10:235 Udev will pick up the depmod created file on startup and create all the static device nodes which the kernel modules specify, so that these modules get automatically loaded when the device node is accessed: $ /sbin/udevd --debug ... static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/cpu/microcode' c10:184 static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/fuse' c10:229 static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/ppp' c108:0 static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/net/tun' c10:200 static_dev_create_from_modules: mknod '/dev/mapper/control' c10:235 udev_rules_apply_static_dev_perms: chmod '/dev/net/tun' 0666 udev_rules_apply_static_dev_perms: chmod '/dev/fuse' 0666 A few device nodes are switched to statically allocated numbers, to allow the static nodes to work. This might also useful for systems which still run a plain static /dev, which is completely unsafe to use with any dynamic minor numbers. Note: The devname aliases must be limited to the *common* and *single*instance* device nodes, like the misc devices, and never be used for conceptually limited systems like the loop devices, which should rather get fixed properly and get a control node for losetup to talk to, instead of creating a random number of device nodes in advance, regardless if they are ever used. This facility is to hide the mess distros are creating with too modualized kernels, and just to hide that these modules are not compiled-in, and not to paper-over broken concepts. Thanks! :) Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com> Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk> Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> Signed-Off-By: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2010-05-20 16:07:20 +00:00
MODULE_ALIAS("devname:cpu/microcode");
#else
#define microcode_dev_init() 0
#define microcode_dev_exit() do { } while (0)
#endif
/* fake device for request_firmware */
static struct platform_device *microcode_pdev;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
static int reload_for_cpu(int cpu)
{
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
int err = 0;
mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
if (uci->valid) {
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
enum ucode_state ustate;
ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev);
if (ustate == UCODE_OK)
apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
else
if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR)
err = -EINVAL;
}
mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return err;
}
static ssize_t reload_store(struct sys_device *dev,
struct sysdev_attribute *attr,
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
const char *buf, size_t size)
{
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
unsigned long val;
int cpu = dev->id;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
int ret = 0;
char *end;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
val = simple_strtoul(buf, &end, 0);
if (end == buf)
return -EINVAL;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
if (val == 1) {
get_online_cpus();
if (cpu_online(cpu))
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu);
put_online_cpus();
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
if (!ret)
ret = size;
return ret;
}
static ssize_t version_show(struct sys_device *dev,
struct sysdev_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + dev->id;
return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->cpu_sig.rev);
}
static ssize_t pf_show(struct sys_device *dev,
struct sysdev_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + dev->id;
return sprintf(buf, "0x%x\n", uci->cpu_sig.pf);
}
static SYSDEV_ATTR(reload, 0200, NULL, reload_store);
static SYSDEV_ATTR(version, 0400, version_show, NULL);
static SYSDEV_ATTR(processor_flags, 0400, pf_show, NULL);
static struct attribute *mc_default_attrs[] = {
&attr_reload.attr,
&attr_version.attr,
&attr_processor_flags.attr,
NULL
};
static struct attribute_group mc_attr_group = {
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
.attrs = mc_default_attrs,
.name = "microcode",
};
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
static void microcode_fini_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
microcode_ops->microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
uci->valid = 0;
x86: fix resume (S2R) broken by Intel microcode module, on A110L Impact: fix deadlock This is in response to the following bug report: Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12100 Subject : resume (S2R) broken by Intel microcode module, on A110L Submitter : Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Date : 2008-11-25 08:48 (19 days old) Handled-By : Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> [ The deadlock scenario has been discovered by Andreas Mohr ] I think I might have a logical explanation why the system: (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12100) might hang upon resuming, OTOH it should have likely hanged each and every time. (1) possible deadlock in microcode_resume_cpu() if either 'if' section is taken; (2) now, I don't see it in spec. and can't experimentally verify it (newer ucodes don't seem to be available for my Core2duo)... but logically-wise, I'd think that when read upon resuming, the 'microcode revision' (MSR 0x8B) should be back to its original one (we need to reload ucode anyway so it doesn't seem logical if a cpu doesn't drop the version)... if so, the comparison with memcmp() for the full 'struct cpu_signature' is wrong... and that's how one of the aforementioned 'if' sections might have been triggered - leading to a deadlock. Obviously, in my tests I simulated loading/resuming with the ucode of the same version (just to see that the file is loaded/re-loaded upon resuming) so this issue has never popped up. I'd appreciate if someone with an appropriate system might give a try to the 2nd patch (titled "fix a comparison && deadlock..."). In any case, the deadlock situation is a must-have fix. Reported-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Tested-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-12-19 23:15:24 +00:00
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
static enum ucode_state microcode_resume_cpu(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
if (!uci->mc)
return UCODE_NFOUND;
pr_debug("CPU%d updated upon resume\n", cpu);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
return UCODE_OK;
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
static enum ucode_state microcode_init_cpu(int cpu)
{
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
enum ucode_state ustate;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
if (collect_cpu_info(cpu))
return UCODE_ERROR;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
/* --dimm. Trigger a delayed update? */
if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)
return UCODE_NFOUND;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, &microcode_pdev->dev);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
if (ustate == UCODE_OK) {
pr_debug("CPU%d updated upon init\n", cpu);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
apply_microcode_on_target(cpu);
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return ustate;
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
static enum ucode_state microcode_update_cpu(int cpu)
{
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
enum ucode_state ustate;
if (uci->valid)
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
ustate = microcode_resume_cpu(cpu);
else
ustate = microcode_init_cpu(cpu);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return ustate;
}
static int mc_sysdev_add(struct sys_device *sys_dev)
{
int err, cpu = sys_dev->id;
if (!cpu_online(cpu))
return 0;
pr_debug("CPU%d added\n", cpu);
err = sysfs_create_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group);
if (err)
return err;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
if (microcode_init_cpu(cpu) == UCODE_ERROR)
err = -EINVAL;
return err;
}
static int mc_sysdev_remove(struct sys_device *sys_dev)
{
int cpu = sys_dev->id;
if (!cpu_online(cpu))
return 0;
pr_debug("CPU%d removed\n", cpu);
microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
sysfs_remove_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group);
return 0;
}
static int mc_sysdev_resume(struct sys_device *dev)
{
int cpu = dev->id;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
if (!cpu_online(cpu))
return 0;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
/*
* All non-bootup cpus are still disabled,
* so only CPU 0 will apply ucode here.
*
* Moreover, there can be no concurrent
* updates from any other places at this point.
*/
WARN_ON(cpu != 0);
if (uci->valid && uci->mc)
microcode_ops->apply_microcode(cpu);
return 0;
}
static struct sysdev_driver mc_sysdev_driver = {
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
.add = mc_sysdev_add,
.remove = mc_sysdev_remove,
.resume = mc_sysdev_resume,
};
static __cpuinit int
mc_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
struct sys_device *sys_dev;
sys_dev = get_cpu_sysdev(cpu);
switch (action) {
case CPU_ONLINE:
case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
microcode_update_cpu(cpu);
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED_FROZEN:
pr_debug("CPU%d added\n", cpu);
if (sysfs_create_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group))
pr_err("Failed to create group for CPU%d\n", cpu);
break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN:
/* Suspend is in progress, only remove the interface */
sysfs_remove_group(&sys_dev->kobj, &mc_attr_group);
pr_debug("CPU%d removed\n", cpu);
break;
case CPU_DEAD:
case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
/* The CPU refused to come up during a system resume */
microcode_fini_cpu(cpu);
break;
}
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
static struct notifier_block __refdata mc_cpu_notifier = {
.notifier_call = mc_cpu_callback,
};
static int __init microcode_init(void)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
int error;
if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
microcode_ops = init_intel_microcode();
else if (c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
microcode_ops = init_amd_microcode();
if (!microcode_ops) {
pr_err("no support for this CPU vendor\n");
return -ENODEV;
}
microcode_pdev = platform_device_register_simple("microcode", -1,
NULL, 0);
if (IS_ERR(microcode_pdev)) {
microcode_dev_exit();
return PTR_ERR(microcode_pdev);
}
get_online_cpus();
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
error = sysdev_driver_register(&cpu_sysdev_class, &mc_sysdev_driver);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
put_online_cpus();
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
if (error) {
platform_device_unregister(microcode_pdev);
return error;
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
error = microcode_dev_init();
if (error)
return error;
register_hotcpu_notifier(&mc_cpu_notifier);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
pr_info("Microcode Update Driver: v" MICROCODE_VERSION
" <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba\n");
return 0;
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
module_init(microcode_init);
static void __exit microcode_exit(void)
{
microcode_dev_exit();
unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&mc_cpu_notifier);
get_online_cpus();
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
mutex_lock(&microcode_mutex);
sysdev_driver_unregister(&cpu_sysdev_class, &mc_sysdev_driver);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
put_online_cpus();
platform_device_unregister(microcode_pdev);
microcode_ops = NULL;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
pr_info("Microcode Update Driver: v" MICROCODE_VERSION " removed.\n");
}
module_exit(microcode_exit);