linux-stable/arch/um/kernel/irq.c

767 lines
18 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Copyright (C) 2017 - Cambridge Greys Ltd
* Copyright (C) 2011 - 2014 Cisco Systems Inc
* Copyright (C) 2000 - 2007 Jeff Dike (jdike@{addtoit,linux.intel}.com)
* Derived (i.e. mostly copied) from arch/i386/kernel/irq.c:
* Copyright (C) 1992, 1998 Linus Torvalds, Ingo Molnar
*/
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <as-layout.h>
#include <kern_util.h>
#include <os.h>
#include <irq_user.h>
#include <irq_kern.h>
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
#include <linux/time-internal.h>
/* When epoll triggers we do not know why it did so
* we can also have different IRQs for read and write.
* This is why we keep a small irq_reg array for each fd -
* one entry per IRQ type
*/
struct irq_reg {
void *id;
int irq;
/* it's cheaper to store this than to query it */
int events;
bool active;
bool pending;
bool wakeup;
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
bool pending_on_resume;
void (*timetravel_handler)(int, int, void *,
struct time_travel_event *);
struct time_travel_event event;
#endif
};
struct irq_entry {
struct list_head list;
int fd;
struct irq_reg reg[NUM_IRQ_TYPES];
bool suspended;
bool sigio_workaround;
};
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(active_fds);
static DECLARE_BITMAP(irqs_allocated, UM_LAST_SIGNAL_IRQ);
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
static bool irqs_suspended;
static void irq_io_loop(struct irq_reg *irq, struct uml_pt_regs *regs)
{
/*
* irq->active guards against reentry
* irq->pending accumulates pending requests
* if pending is raised the irq_handler is re-run
* until pending is cleared
*/
if (irq->active) {
irq->active = false;
do {
irq->pending = false;
do_IRQ(irq->irq, regs);
} while (irq->pending);
irq->active = true;
} else {
irq->pending = true;
}
}
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
static void irq_event_handler(struct time_travel_event *ev)
{
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
struct irq_reg *reg = container_of(ev, struct irq_reg, event);
/* do nothing if suspended - just to cause a wakeup */
if (irqs_suspended)
return;
generic_handle_irq(reg->irq);
}
static bool irq_do_timetravel_handler(struct irq_entry *entry,
enum um_irq_type t)
{
struct irq_reg *reg = &entry->reg[t];
if (!reg->timetravel_handler)
return false;
/*
* Handle all messages - we might get multiple even while
* interrupts are already suspended, due to suspend order
* etc. Note that time_travel_add_irq_event() will not add
* an event twice, if it's pending already "first wins".
*/
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
reg->timetravel_handler(reg->irq, entry->fd, reg->id, &reg->event);
if (!reg->event.pending)
return false;
if (irqs_suspended)
reg->pending_on_resume = true;
return true;
}
#else
static bool irq_do_timetravel_handler(struct irq_entry *entry,
enum um_irq_type t)
{
return false;
}
#endif
static void sigio_reg_handler(int idx, struct irq_entry *entry, enum um_irq_type t,
struct uml_pt_regs *regs,
bool timetravel_handlers_only)
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
{
struct irq_reg *reg = &entry->reg[t];
if (!reg->events)
return;
if (os_epoll_triggered(idx, reg->events) <= 0)
return;
if (irq_do_timetravel_handler(entry, t))
return;
/*
* If we're called to only run time-travel handlers then don't
* actually proceed but mark sigio as pending (if applicable).
* For suspend/resume, timetravel_handlers_only may be true
* despite time-travel not being configured and used.
*/
if (timetravel_handlers_only) {
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
mark_sigio_pending();
#endif
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
return;
}
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
irq_io_loop(reg, regs);
}
static void _sigio_handler(struct uml_pt_regs *regs,
bool timetravel_handlers_only)
{
struct irq_entry *irq_entry;
int n, i;
if (timetravel_handlers_only && !um_irq_timetravel_handler_used())
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
return;
while (1) {
/* This is now lockless - epoll keeps back-referencesto the irqs
* which have trigger it so there is no need to walk the irq
* list and lock it every time. We avoid locking by turning off
* IO for a specific fd by executing os_del_epoll_fd(fd) before
* we do any changes to the actual data structures
*/
n = os_waiting_for_events_epoll();
if (n <= 0) {
if (n == -EINTR)
continue;
else
break;
}
for (i = 0; i < n ; i++) {
enum um_irq_type t;
irq_entry = os_epoll_get_data_pointer(i);
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
for (t = 0; t < NUM_IRQ_TYPES; t++)
sigio_reg_handler(i, irq_entry, t, regs,
timetravel_handlers_only);
}
}
if (!timetravel_handlers_only)
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
free_irqs();
}
void sigio_handler(int sig, struct siginfo *unused_si, struct uml_pt_regs *regs)
{
_sigio_handler(regs, irqs_suspended);
}
static struct irq_entry *get_irq_entry_by_fd(int fd)
{
struct irq_entry *walk;
lockdep_assert_held(&irq_lock);
list_for_each_entry(walk, &active_fds, list) {
if (walk->fd == fd)
return walk;
}
return NULL;
}
static void free_irq_entry(struct irq_entry *to_free, bool remove)
{
if (!to_free)
return;
if (remove)
os_del_epoll_fd(to_free->fd);
list_del(&to_free->list);
kfree(to_free);
}
static bool update_irq_entry(struct irq_entry *entry)
{
enum um_irq_type i;
int events = 0;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_IRQ_TYPES; i++)
events |= entry->reg[i].events;
if (events) {
/* will modify (instead of add) if needed */
os_add_epoll_fd(events, entry->fd, entry);
return true;
}
os_del_epoll_fd(entry->fd);
return false;
}
static void update_or_free_irq_entry(struct irq_entry *entry)
{
if (!update_irq_entry(entry))
free_irq_entry(entry, false);
}
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
static int activate_fd(int irq, int fd, enum um_irq_type type, void *dev_id,
void (*timetravel_handler)(int, int, void *,
struct time_travel_event *))
{
struct irq_entry *irq_entry;
int err, events = os_event_mask(type);
unsigned long flags;
err = os_set_fd_async(fd);
if (err < 0)
goto out;
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_lock, flags);
irq_entry = get_irq_entry_by_fd(fd);
if (irq_entry) {
/* cannot register the same FD twice with the same type */
if (WARN_ON(irq_entry->reg[type].events)) {
err = -EALREADY;
goto out_unlock;
}
/* temporarily disable to avoid IRQ-side locking */
os_del_epoll_fd(fd);
} else {
irq_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*irq_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!irq_entry) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out_unlock;
}
irq_entry->fd = fd;
list_add_tail(&irq_entry->list, &active_fds);
maybe_sigio_broken(fd);
}
irq_entry->reg[type].id = dev_id;
irq_entry->reg[type].irq = irq;
irq_entry->reg[type].active = true;
irq_entry->reg[type].events = events;
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
if (um_irq_timetravel_handler_used()) {
irq_entry->reg[type].timetravel_handler = timetravel_handler;
irq_entry->reg[type].event.fn = irq_event_handler;
}
#endif
WARN_ON(!update_irq_entry(irq_entry));
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_lock, flags);
return 0;
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_lock, flags);
out:
return err;
}
/*
* Remove the entry or entries for a specific FD, if you
* don't want to remove all the possible entries then use
* um_free_irq() or deactivate_fd() instead.
*/
void free_irq_by_fd(int fd)
{
struct irq_entry *to_free;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_lock, flags);
to_free = get_irq_entry_by_fd(fd);
free_irq_entry(to_free, true);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_irq_by_fd);
static void free_irq_by_irq_and_dev(unsigned int irq, void *dev)
{
struct irq_entry *entry;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(entry, &active_fds, list) {
enum um_irq_type i;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_IRQ_TYPES; i++) {
struct irq_reg *reg = &entry->reg[i];
if (!reg->events)
continue;
if (reg->irq != irq)
continue;
if (reg->id != dev)
continue;
os_del_epoll_fd(entry->fd);
reg->events = 0;
update_or_free_irq_entry(entry);
goto out;
}
}
out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_lock, flags);
}
void deactivate_fd(int fd, int irqnum)
{
struct irq_entry *entry;
unsigned long flags;
enum um_irq_type i;
os_del_epoll_fd(fd);
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_lock, flags);
entry = get_irq_entry_by_fd(fd);
if (!entry)
goto out;
for (i = 0; i < NUM_IRQ_TYPES; i++) {
if (!entry->reg[i].events)
continue;
if (entry->reg[i].irq == irqnum)
entry->reg[i].events = 0;
}
update_or_free_irq_entry(entry);
out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_lock, flags);
ignore_sigio_fd(fd);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(deactivate_fd);
/*
* Called just before shutdown in order to provide a clean exec
* environment in case the system is rebooting. No locking because
* that would cause a pointless shutdown hang if something hadn't
* released the lock.
*/
int deactivate_all_fds(void)
{
struct irq_entry *entry;
/* Stop IO. The IRQ loop has no lock so this is our
* only way of making sure we are safe to dispose
* of all IRQ handlers
*/
os_set_ioignore();
/* we can no longer call kfree() here so just deactivate */
list_for_each_entry(entry, &active_fds, list)
os_del_epoll_fd(entry->fd);
os_close_epoll_fd();
return 0;
}
/*
* do_IRQ handles all normal device IRQs (the special
* SMP cross-CPU interrupts have their own specific
* handlers).
*/
unsigned int do_IRQ(int irq, struct uml_pt_regs *regs)
{
struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs((struct pt_regs *)regs);
irq_enter();
generic_handle_irq(irq);
irq_exit();
set_irq_regs(old_regs);
return 1;
}
void um_free_irq(int irq, void *dev)
{
if (WARN(irq < 0 || irq > UM_LAST_SIGNAL_IRQ,
"freeing invalid irq %d", irq))
return;
free_irq_by_irq_and_dev(irq, dev);
free_irq(irq, dev);
clear_bit(irq, irqs_allocated);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(um_free_irq);
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
static int
_um_request_irq(int irq, int fd, enum um_irq_type type,
irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long irqflags,
const char *devname, void *dev_id,
void (*timetravel_handler)(int, int, void *,
struct time_travel_event *))
{
int err;
if (irq == UM_IRQ_ALLOC) {
int i;
for (i = UM_FIRST_DYN_IRQ; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
if (!test_and_set_bit(i, irqs_allocated)) {
irq = i;
break;
}
}
}
if (irq < 0)
return -ENOSPC;
if (fd != -1) {
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
err = activate_fd(irq, fd, type, dev_id, timetravel_handler);
if (err)
goto error;
}
err = request_irq(irq, handler, irqflags, devname, dev_id);
if (err < 0)
goto error;
return irq;
error:
clear_bit(irq, irqs_allocated);
return err;
}
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
int um_request_irq(int irq, int fd, enum um_irq_type type,
irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long irqflags,
const char *devname, void *dev_id)
{
return _um_request_irq(irq, fd, type, handler, irqflags,
devname, dev_id, NULL);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(um_request_irq);
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
int um_request_irq_tt(int irq, int fd, enum um_irq_type type,
irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long irqflags,
const char *devname, void *dev_id,
void (*timetravel_handler)(int, int, void *,
struct time_travel_event *))
{
return _um_request_irq(irq, fd, type, handler, irqflags,
devname, dev_id, timetravel_handler);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(um_request_irq_tt);
void sigio_run_timetravel_handlers(void)
{
_sigio_handler(NULL, true);
}
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
void um_irqs_suspend(void)
{
struct irq_entry *entry;
unsigned long flags;
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
irqs_suspended = true;
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(entry, &active_fds, list) {
enum um_irq_type t;
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
bool clear = true;
for (t = 0; t < NUM_IRQ_TYPES; t++) {
if (!entry->reg[t].events)
continue;
/*
* For the SIGIO_WRITE_IRQ, which is used to handle the
* SIGIO workaround thread, we need special handling:
* enable wake for it itself, but below we tell it about
* any FDs that should be suspended.
*/
if (entry->reg[t].wakeup ||
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
entry->reg[t].irq == SIGIO_WRITE_IRQ
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
|| entry->reg[t].timetravel_handler
#endif
) {
clear = false;
break;
}
}
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
if (clear) {
entry->suspended = true;
os_clear_fd_async(entry->fd);
entry->sigio_workaround =
!__ignore_sigio_fd(entry->fd);
}
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_lock, flags);
}
void um_irqs_resume(void)
{
struct irq_entry *entry;
unsigned long flags;
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
local_irq_save(flags);
#ifdef CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
/*
* We don't need to lock anything here since we're in resume
* and nothing else is running, but have disabled IRQs so we
* don't try anything else with the interrupt list from there.
*/
list_for_each_entry(entry, &active_fds, list) {
enum um_irq_type t;
for (t = 0; t < NUM_IRQ_TYPES; t++) {
struct irq_reg *reg = &entry->reg[t];
if (reg->pending_on_resume) {
irq_enter();
generic_handle_irq(reg->irq);
irq_exit();
reg->pending_on_resume = false;
}
}
}
#endif
spin_lock(&irq_lock);
list_for_each_entry(entry, &active_fds, list) {
if (entry->suspended) {
int err = os_set_fd_async(entry->fd);
WARN(err < 0, "os_set_fd_async returned %d\n", err);
entry->suspended = false;
if (entry->sigio_workaround) {
err = __add_sigio_fd(entry->fd);
WARN(err < 0, "add_sigio_returned %d\n", err);
}
}
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_lock, flags);
um: time-travel: rework interrupt handling in ext mode In external time-travel mode, where time is controlled via the controller application socket, interrupt handling is a little tricky. For example on virtio, the following happens: * we receive a message (that requires an ACK) on the vhost-user socket * we add a time-travel event to handle the interrupt (this causes communication on the time socket) * we ACK the original vhost-user message * we then handle the interrupt once the event is triggered This protocol ensures that the sender of the interrupt only continues to run in the simulation when the time-travel event has been added. So far, this was only done in the virtio driver, but it was actually wrong, because only virtqueue interrupts were handled this way, and config change interrupts were handled immediately. Additionally, the messages were actually handled in the real Linux interrupt handler, but Linux interrupt handlers are part of the simulation and shouldn't run while there's no time event. To really do this properly and only handle all kinds of interrupts in the time-travel event when we are scheduled to run in the simulation, rework this to plug in to the lower interrupt layers in UML directly: Add a um_request_irq_tt() function that let's a time-travel aware driver request an interrupt with an additional timetravel_handler() that is called outside of the context of the simulation, to handle the message only. It then adds an event to the time-travel calendar if necessary, and no "real" Linux code runs outside of the time simulation. This also hooks in with suspend/resume properly now, since this new timetravel_handler() can run while Linux is suspended and interrupts are disabled, and decide to wake up (or not) the system based on the message it received. Importantly in this case, it ACKs the message before the system even resumes and interrupts are re-enabled, thus allowing the simulation to progress properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
2020-12-15 09:52:24 +00:00
irqs_suspended = false;
send_sigio_to_self();
}
static int normal_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
{
struct irq_entry *entry;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(entry, &active_fds, list) {
enum um_irq_type t;
for (t = 0; t < NUM_IRQ_TYPES; t++) {
if (!entry->reg[t].events)
continue;
if (entry->reg[t].irq != d->irq)
continue;
entry->reg[t].wakeup = on;
goto unlock;
}
}
unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
#else
#define normal_irq_set_wake NULL
#endif
/*
* irq_chip must define at least enable/disable and ack when
* the edge handler is used.
*/
static void dummy(struct irq_data *d)
{
}
/* This is used for everything other than the timer. */
static struct irq_chip normal_irq_type = {
.name = "SIGIO",
.irq_disable = dummy,
.irq_enable = dummy,
.irq_ack = dummy,
.irq_mask = dummy,
.irq_unmask = dummy,
.irq_set_wake = normal_irq_set_wake,
};
static struct irq_chip alarm_irq_type = {
.name = "SIGALRM",
.irq_disable = dummy,
.irq_enable = dummy,
.irq_ack = dummy,
.irq_mask = dummy,
.irq_unmask = dummy,
};
void __init init_IRQ(void)
{
int i;
irq_set_chip_and_handler(TIMER_IRQ, &alarm_irq_type, handle_edge_irq);
for (i = 1; i < UM_LAST_SIGNAL_IRQ; i++)
irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &normal_irq_type, handle_edge_irq);
/* Initialize EPOLL Loop */
os_setup_epoll();
}
uml: iRQ stacks Add a separate IRQ stack. This differs from i386 in having the entire interrupt run on a separate stack rather than starting on the normal kernel stack and switching over once some preparation has been done. The underlying mechanism, is of course, sigaltstack. Another difference is that interrupts that happen in userspace are handled on the normal kernel stack. These cause a wait wakeup instead of a signal delivery so there is no point in trying to switch stacks for these. There's no other stuff on the stack, so there is no extra stack consumption. This quirk makes it possible to have the entire interrupt run on a separate stack - process preemption (and calls to schedule()) happens on a normal kernel stack. If we enable CONFIG_PREEMPT, this will need to be rethought. The IRQ stack for CPU 0 is declared in the same way as the initial kernel stack. IRQ stacks for other CPUs will be allocated dynamically. An extra field was added to the thread_info structure. When the active thread_info is copied to the IRQ stack, the real_thread field points back to the original stack. This makes it easy to tell where to copy the thread_info struct back to when the interrupt is finished. It also serves as a marker of a nested interrupt. It is NULL for the first interrupt on the stack, and non-NULL for any nested interrupts. Care is taken to behave correctly if a second interrupt comes in when the thread_info structure is being set up or taken down. I could just disable interrupts here, but I don't feel like giving up any of the performance gained by not flipping signals on and off. If an interrupt comes in during these critical periods, the handler can't run because it has no idea what shape the stack is in. So, it sets a bit for its signal in a global mask and returns. The outer handler will deal with this signal itself. Atomicity is had with xchg. A nested interrupt that needs to bail out will xchg its signal mask into pending_mask and repeat in case yet another interrupt hit at the same time, until the mask stabilizes. The outermost interrupt will set up the thread_info and xchg a zero into pending_mask when it is done. At this point, nested interrupts will look at ->real_thread and see that no setup needs to be done. They can just continue normally. Similar care needs to be taken when exiting the outer handler. If another interrupt comes in while it is copying the thread_info, it will drop a bit into pending_mask. The outer handler will check this and if it is non-zero, will loop, set up the stack again, and handle the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-11 05:22:34 +00:00
/*
* IRQ stack entry and exit:
*
* Unlike i386, UML doesn't receive IRQs on the normal kernel stack
* and switch over to the IRQ stack after some preparation. We use
* sigaltstack to receive signals on a separate stack from the start.
* These two functions make sure the rest of the kernel won't be too
* upset by being on a different stack. The IRQ stack has a
* thread_info structure at the bottom so that current et al continue
* to work.
*
* to_irq_stack copies the current task's thread_info to the IRQ stack
* thread_info and sets the tasks's stack to point to the IRQ stack.
*
* from_irq_stack copies the thread_info struct back (flags may have
* been modified) and resets the task's stack pointer.
*
* Tricky bits -
*
* What happens when two signals race each other? UML doesn't block
* signals with sigprocmask, SA_DEFER, or sa_mask, so a second signal
* could arrive while a previous one is still setting up the
* thread_info.
*
* There are three cases -
* The first interrupt on the stack - sets up the thread_info and
* handles the interrupt
* A nested interrupt interrupting the copying of the thread_info -
* can't handle the interrupt, as the stack is in an unknown state
* A nested interrupt not interrupting the copying of the
* thread_info - doesn't do any setup, just handles the interrupt
*
* The first job is to figure out whether we interrupted stack setup.
* This is done by xchging the signal mask with thread_info->pending.
* If the value that comes back is zero, then there is no setup in
* progress, and the interrupt can be handled. If the value is
* non-zero, then there is stack setup in progress. In order to have
* the interrupt handled, we leave our signal in the mask, and it will
* be handled by the upper handler after it has set up the stack.
*
* Next is to figure out whether we are the outer handler or a nested
* one. As part of setting up the stack, thread_info->real_thread is
* set to non-NULL (and is reset to NULL on exit). This is the
* nesting indicator. If it is non-NULL, then the stack is already
* set up and the handler can run.
*/
static unsigned long pending_mask;
unsigned long to_irq_stack(unsigned long *mask_out)
uml: iRQ stacks Add a separate IRQ stack. This differs from i386 in having the entire interrupt run on a separate stack rather than starting on the normal kernel stack and switching over once some preparation has been done. The underlying mechanism, is of course, sigaltstack. Another difference is that interrupts that happen in userspace are handled on the normal kernel stack. These cause a wait wakeup instead of a signal delivery so there is no point in trying to switch stacks for these. There's no other stuff on the stack, so there is no extra stack consumption. This quirk makes it possible to have the entire interrupt run on a separate stack - process preemption (and calls to schedule()) happens on a normal kernel stack. If we enable CONFIG_PREEMPT, this will need to be rethought. The IRQ stack for CPU 0 is declared in the same way as the initial kernel stack. IRQ stacks for other CPUs will be allocated dynamically. An extra field was added to the thread_info structure. When the active thread_info is copied to the IRQ stack, the real_thread field points back to the original stack. This makes it easy to tell where to copy the thread_info struct back to when the interrupt is finished. It also serves as a marker of a nested interrupt. It is NULL for the first interrupt on the stack, and non-NULL for any nested interrupts. Care is taken to behave correctly if a second interrupt comes in when the thread_info structure is being set up or taken down. I could just disable interrupts here, but I don't feel like giving up any of the performance gained by not flipping signals on and off. If an interrupt comes in during these critical periods, the handler can't run because it has no idea what shape the stack is in. So, it sets a bit for its signal in a global mask and returns. The outer handler will deal with this signal itself. Atomicity is had with xchg. A nested interrupt that needs to bail out will xchg its signal mask into pending_mask and repeat in case yet another interrupt hit at the same time, until the mask stabilizes. The outermost interrupt will set up the thread_info and xchg a zero into pending_mask when it is done. At this point, nested interrupts will look at ->real_thread and see that no setup needs to be done. They can just continue normally. Similar care needs to be taken when exiting the outer handler. If another interrupt comes in while it is copying the thread_info, it will drop a bit into pending_mask. The outer handler will check this and if it is non-zero, will loop, set up the stack again, and handle the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-11 05:22:34 +00:00
{
struct thread_info *ti;
unsigned long mask, old;
int nested;
mask = xchg(&pending_mask, *mask_out);
if (mask != 0) {
/*
* If any interrupts come in at this point, we want to
uml: iRQ stacks Add a separate IRQ stack. This differs from i386 in having the entire interrupt run on a separate stack rather than starting on the normal kernel stack and switching over once some preparation has been done. The underlying mechanism, is of course, sigaltstack. Another difference is that interrupts that happen in userspace are handled on the normal kernel stack. These cause a wait wakeup instead of a signal delivery so there is no point in trying to switch stacks for these. There's no other stuff on the stack, so there is no extra stack consumption. This quirk makes it possible to have the entire interrupt run on a separate stack - process preemption (and calls to schedule()) happens on a normal kernel stack. If we enable CONFIG_PREEMPT, this will need to be rethought. The IRQ stack for CPU 0 is declared in the same way as the initial kernel stack. IRQ stacks for other CPUs will be allocated dynamically. An extra field was added to the thread_info structure. When the active thread_info is copied to the IRQ stack, the real_thread field points back to the original stack. This makes it easy to tell where to copy the thread_info struct back to when the interrupt is finished. It also serves as a marker of a nested interrupt. It is NULL for the first interrupt on the stack, and non-NULL for any nested interrupts. Care is taken to behave correctly if a second interrupt comes in when the thread_info structure is being set up or taken down. I could just disable interrupts here, but I don't feel like giving up any of the performance gained by not flipping signals on and off. If an interrupt comes in during these critical periods, the handler can't run because it has no idea what shape the stack is in. So, it sets a bit for its signal in a global mask and returns. The outer handler will deal with this signal itself. Atomicity is had with xchg. A nested interrupt that needs to bail out will xchg its signal mask into pending_mask and repeat in case yet another interrupt hit at the same time, until the mask stabilizes. The outermost interrupt will set up the thread_info and xchg a zero into pending_mask when it is done. At this point, nested interrupts will look at ->real_thread and see that no setup needs to be done. They can just continue normally. Similar care needs to be taken when exiting the outer handler. If another interrupt comes in while it is copying the thread_info, it will drop a bit into pending_mask. The outer handler will check this and if it is non-zero, will loop, set up the stack again, and handle the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-11 05:22:34 +00:00
* make sure that their bits aren't lost by our
* putting our bit in. So, this loop accumulates bits
* until xchg returns the same value that we put in.
* When that happens, there were no new interrupts,
* and pending_mask contains a bit for each interrupt
* that came in.
*/
old = *mask_out;
uml: iRQ stacks Add a separate IRQ stack. This differs from i386 in having the entire interrupt run on a separate stack rather than starting on the normal kernel stack and switching over once some preparation has been done. The underlying mechanism, is of course, sigaltstack. Another difference is that interrupts that happen in userspace are handled on the normal kernel stack. These cause a wait wakeup instead of a signal delivery so there is no point in trying to switch stacks for these. There's no other stuff on the stack, so there is no extra stack consumption. This quirk makes it possible to have the entire interrupt run on a separate stack - process preemption (and calls to schedule()) happens on a normal kernel stack. If we enable CONFIG_PREEMPT, this will need to be rethought. The IRQ stack for CPU 0 is declared in the same way as the initial kernel stack. IRQ stacks for other CPUs will be allocated dynamically. An extra field was added to the thread_info structure. When the active thread_info is copied to the IRQ stack, the real_thread field points back to the original stack. This makes it easy to tell where to copy the thread_info struct back to when the interrupt is finished. It also serves as a marker of a nested interrupt. It is NULL for the first interrupt on the stack, and non-NULL for any nested interrupts. Care is taken to behave correctly if a second interrupt comes in when the thread_info structure is being set up or taken down. I could just disable interrupts here, but I don't feel like giving up any of the performance gained by not flipping signals on and off. If an interrupt comes in during these critical periods, the handler can't run because it has no idea what shape the stack is in. So, it sets a bit for its signal in a global mask and returns. The outer handler will deal with this signal itself. Atomicity is had with xchg. A nested interrupt that needs to bail out will xchg its signal mask into pending_mask and repeat in case yet another interrupt hit at the same time, until the mask stabilizes. The outermost interrupt will set up the thread_info and xchg a zero into pending_mask when it is done. At this point, nested interrupts will look at ->real_thread and see that no setup needs to be done. They can just continue normally. Similar care needs to be taken when exiting the outer handler. If another interrupt comes in while it is copying the thread_info, it will drop a bit into pending_mask. The outer handler will check this and if it is non-zero, will loop, set up the stack again, and handle the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-11 05:22:34 +00:00
do {
old |= mask;
mask = xchg(&pending_mask, old);
} while (mask != old);
uml: iRQ stacks Add a separate IRQ stack. This differs from i386 in having the entire interrupt run on a separate stack rather than starting on the normal kernel stack and switching over once some preparation has been done. The underlying mechanism, is of course, sigaltstack. Another difference is that interrupts that happen in userspace are handled on the normal kernel stack. These cause a wait wakeup instead of a signal delivery so there is no point in trying to switch stacks for these. There's no other stuff on the stack, so there is no extra stack consumption. This quirk makes it possible to have the entire interrupt run on a separate stack - process preemption (and calls to schedule()) happens on a normal kernel stack. If we enable CONFIG_PREEMPT, this will need to be rethought. The IRQ stack for CPU 0 is declared in the same way as the initial kernel stack. IRQ stacks for other CPUs will be allocated dynamically. An extra field was added to the thread_info structure. When the active thread_info is copied to the IRQ stack, the real_thread field points back to the original stack. This makes it easy to tell where to copy the thread_info struct back to when the interrupt is finished. It also serves as a marker of a nested interrupt. It is NULL for the first interrupt on the stack, and non-NULL for any nested interrupts. Care is taken to behave correctly if a second interrupt comes in when the thread_info structure is being set up or taken down. I could just disable interrupts here, but I don't feel like giving up any of the performance gained by not flipping signals on and off. If an interrupt comes in during these critical periods, the handler can't run because it has no idea what shape the stack is in. So, it sets a bit for its signal in a global mask and returns. The outer handler will deal with this signal itself. Atomicity is had with xchg. A nested interrupt that needs to bail out will xchg its signal mask into pending_mask and repeat in case yet another interrupt hit at the same time, until the mask stabilizes. The outermost interrupt will set up the thread_info and xchg a zero into pending_mask when it is done. At this point, nested interrupts will look at ->real_thread and see that no setup needs to be done. They can just continue normally. Similar care needs to be taken when exiting the outer handler. If another interrupt comes in while it is copying the thread_info, it will drop a bit into pending_mask. The outer handler will check this and if it is non-zero, will loop, set up the stack again, and handle the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-11 05:22:34 +00:00
return 1;
}
ti = current_thread_info();
nested = (ti->real_thread != NULL);
if (!nested) {
uml: iRQ stacks Add a separate IRQ stack. This differs from i386 in having the entire interrupt run on a separate stack rather than starting on the normal kernel stack and switching over once some preparation has been done. The underlying mechanism, is of course, sigaltstack. Another difference is that interrupts that happen in userspace are handled on the normal kernel stack. These cause a wait wakeup instead of a signal delivery so there is no point in trying to switch stacks for these. There's no other stuff on the stack, so there is no extra stack consumption. This quirk makes it possible to have the entire interrupt run on a separate stack - process preemption (and calls to schedule()) happens on a normal kernel stack. If we enable CONFIG_PREEMPT, this will need to be rethought. The IRQ stack for CPU 0 is declared in the same way as the initial kernel stack. IRQ stacks for other CPUs will be allocated dynamically. An extra field was added to the thread_info structure. When the active thread_info is copied to the IRQ stack, the real_thread field points back to the original stack. This makes it easy to tell where to copy the thread_info struct back to when the interrupt is finished. It also serves as a marker of a nested interrupt. It is NULL for the first interrupt on the stack, and non-NULL for any nested interrupts. Care is taken to behave correctly if a second interrupt comes in when the thread_info structure is being set up or taken down. I could just disable interrupts here, but I don't feel like giving up any of the performance gained by not flipping signals on and off. If an interrupt comes in during these critical periods, the handler can't run because it has no idea what shape the stack is in. So, it sets a bit for its signal in a global mask and returns. The outer handler will deal with this signal itself. Atomicity is had with xchg. A nested interrupt that needs to bail out will xchg its signal mask into pending_mask and repeat in case yet another interrupt hit at the same time, until the mask stabilizes. The outermost interrupt will set up the thread_info and xchg a zero into pending_mask when it is done. At this point, nested interrupts will look at ->real_thread and see that no setup needs to be done. They can just continue normally. Similar care needs to be taken when exiting the outer handler. If another interrupt comes in while it is copying the thread_info, it will drop a bit into pending_mask. The outer handler will check this and if it is non-zero, will loop, set up the stack again, and handle the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-11 05:22:34 +00:00
struct task_struct *task;
struct thread_info *tti;
task = cpu_tasks[ti->cpu].task;
tti = task_thread_info(task);
uml: iRQ stacks Add a separate IRQ stack. This differs from i386 in having the entire interrupt run on a separate stack rather than starting on the normal kernel stack and switching over once some preparation has been done. The underlying mechanism, is of course, sigaltstack. Another difference is that interrupts that happen in userspace are handled on the normal kernel stack. These cause a wait wakeup instead of a signal delivery so there is no point in trying to switch stacks for these. There's no other stuff on the stack, so there is no extra stack consumption. This quirk makes it possible to have the entire interrupt run on a separate stack - process preemption (and calls to schedule()) happens on a normal kernel stack. If we enable CONFIG_PREEMPT, this will need to be rethought. The IRQ stack for CPU 0 is declared in the same way as the initial kernel stack. IRQ stacks for other CPUs will be allocated dynamically. An extra field was added to the thread_info structure. When the active thread_info is copied to the IRQ stack, the real_thread field points back to the original stack. This makes it easy to tell where to copy the thread_info struct back to when the interrupt is finished. It also serves as a marker of a nested interrupt. It is NULL for the first interrupt on the stack, and non-NULL for any nested interrupts. Care is taken to behave correctly if a second interrupt comes in when the thread_info structure is being set up or taken down. I could just disable interrupts here, but I don't feel like giving up any of the performance gained by not flipping signals on and off. If an interrupt comes in during these critical periods, the handler can't run because it has no idea what shape the stack is in. So, it sets a bit for its signal in a global mask and returns. The outer handler will deal with this signal itself. Atomicity is had with xchg. A nested interrupt that needs to bail out will xchg its signal mask into pending_mask and repeat in case yet another interrupt hit at the same time, until the mask stabilizes. The outermost interrupt will set up the thread_info and xchg a zero into pending_mask when it is done. At this point, nested interrupts will look at ->real_thread and see that no setup needs to be done. They can just continue normally. Similar care needs to be taken when exiting the outer handler. If another interrupt comes in while it is copying the thread_info, it will drop a bit into pending_mask. The outer handler will check this and if it is non-zero, will loop, set up the stack again, and handle the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-11 05:22:34 +00:00
*ti = *tti;
ti->real_thread = tti;
task->stack = ti;
}
mask = xchg(&pending_mask, 0);
*mask_out |= mask | nested;
return 0;
}
unsigned long from_irq_stack(int nested)
{
struct thread_info *ti, *to;
unsigned long mask;
ti = current_thread_info();
pending_mask = 1;
to = ti->real_thread;
current->stack = to;
ti->real_thread = NULL;
*to = *ti;
mask = xchg(&pending_mask, 0);
return mask & ~1;
}