mirrors/linux-stable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git synced 2024-11-01 00:48:50 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
linux-stable/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx.c

198 lines
5.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

selftests: bpf: break up test_verifier Break up the first 10 kLoC of test verifier test cases out into smaller files. Looks like git line counting gets a little flismy above 16 bit integers, so we need two commits to break up test_verifier. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-25 23:24:43 +00:00
{
"context stores via ST",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark), 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "BPF_ST stores into R1 ctx is not allowed",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with the immediate discriminating different operations. In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD. This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero. All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel headers. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
2021-01-14 18:17:44 +00:00
"context stores via BPF_ATOMIC",
selftests: bpf: break up test_verifier Break up the first 10 kLoC of test verifier test cases out into smaller files. Looks like git line counting gets a little flismy above 16 bit integers, so we need two commits to break up test_verifier. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-25 23:24:43 +00:00
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with the immediate discriminating different operations. In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD. This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero. All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel headers. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
2021-01-14 18:17:44 +00:00
BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
selftests: bpf: break up test_verifier Break up the first 10 kLoC of test verifier test cases out into smaller files. Looks like git line counting gets a little flismy above 16 bit integers, so we need two commits to break up test_verifier. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-25 23:24:43 +00:00
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
bpf: Rename BPF_XADD and prepare to encode other atomics in .imm A subsequent patch will add additional atomic operations. These new operations will use the same opcode field as the existing XADD, with the immediate discriminating different operations. In preparation, rename the instruction mode BPF_ATOMIC and start calling the zero immediate BPF_ADD. This is possible (doesn't break existing valid BPF progs) because the immediate field is currently reserved MBZ and BPF_ADD is zero. All uses are removed from the tree but the BPF_XADD definition is kept around to avoid breaking builds for people including kernel headers. Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210114181751.768687-5-jackmanb@google.com
2021-01-14 18:17:44 +00:00
.errstr = "BPF_ATOMIC stores into R1 ctx is not allowed",
selftests: bpf: break up test_verifier Break up the first 10 kLoC of test verifier test cases out into smaller files. Looks like git line counting gets a little flismy above 16 bit integers, so we need two commits to break up test_verifier. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-25 23:24:43 +00:00
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
selftests: bpf: break up the rest of test_verifier Break up the rest of test_verifier tests into separate files. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-25 23:24:44 +00:00
{
"arithmetic ops make PTR_TO_CTX unusable",
.insns = {
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data) -
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
.result = REJECT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
{
"pass unmodified ctx pointer to helper",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_csum_update),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"pass modified ctx pointer to helper, 1",
.insns = {
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -612),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_csum_update),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
},
{
"pass modified ctx pointer to helper, 2",
.insns = {
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -612),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_socket_cookie),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr_unpriv = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
},
{
"pass modified ctx pointer to helper, 3",
.insns = {
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_3, 4),
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_csum_update),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "variable ctx access var_off=(0x0; 0x4)",
},
bpf: Add selftest cases for ctx_or_null argument type Add various tests to make sure the verifier keeps catching them: # ./test_verifier [...] #230/p pass ctx or null check, 1: ctx OK #231/p pass ctx or null check, 2: null OK #232/p pass ctx or null check, 3: 1 OK #233/p pass ctx or null check, 4: ctx - const OK #234/p pass ctx or null check, 5: null (connect) OK #235/p pass ctx or null check, 6: null (bind) OK #236/p pass ctx or null check, 7: ctx (bind) OK #237/p pass ctx or null check, 8: null (bind) OK [...] Summary: 1595 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/c74758d07b1b678036465ef7f068a49e9efd3548.1585323121.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
2020-03-27 15:58:56 +00:00
{
"pass ctx or null check, 1: ctx",
.insns = {
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_netns_cookie),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"pass ctx or null check, 2: null",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_netns_cookie),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"pass ctx or null check, 3: 1",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_netns_cookie),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=ctx",
},
{
"pass ctx or null check, 4: ctx - const",
.insns = {
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -612),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_netns_cookie),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "dereference of modified ctx ptr",
},
{
"pass ctx or null check, 5: null (connect)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_netns_cookie),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET4_CONNECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"pass ctx or null check, 6: null (bind)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_netns_cookie),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"pass ctx or null check, 7: ctx (bind)",
.insns = {
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_socket_cookie),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
"pass ctx or null check, 8: null (bind)",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
BPF_FUNC_get_socket_cookie),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK,
.expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND,
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=ctx",
},
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink