mirrors/linux-stable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git synced 2024-09-30 14:19:16 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity
linux-stable/drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c

298 lines
6.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* Copyright 2020 Linaro Limited
*
* Author: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
*
* The DTPM CPU is based on the energy model. It hooks the CPU in the
* DTPM tree which in turns update the power number by propagating the
* power number from the CPU energy model information to the parents.
*
* The association between the power and the performance state, allows
* to set the power of the CPU at the OPP granularity.
*
* The CPU hotplug is supported and the power numbers will be updated
* if a CPU is hot plugged / unplugged.
*/
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
#include <linux/dtpm.h>
#include <linux/energy_model.h>
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU DT initialization support Based on the previous DT changes in the core code, use the 'setup' callback to initialize the CPU DTPM backend. Code is reorganized to stick to the DTPM table description. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128163537.212248-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-28 16:35:35 +00:00
#include <linux/of.h>
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/units.h>
struct dtpm_cpu {
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
struct dtpm dtpm;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
struct freq_qos_request qos_req;
int cpu;
};
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct dtpm_cpu *, dtpm_per_cpu);
static struct dtpm_cpu *to_dtpm_cpu(struct dtpm *dtpm)
{
return container_of(dtpm, struct dtpm_cpu, dtpm);
}
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
static u64 set_pd_power_limit(struct dtpm *dtpm, u64 power_limit)
{
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu = to_dtpm_cpu(dtpm);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
struct em_perf_domain *pd = em_cpu_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
struct cpumask cpus;
unsigned long freq;
u64 power;
int i, nr_cpus;
cpumask_and(&cpus, cpu_online_mask, to_cpumask(pd->cpus));
nr_cpus = cpumask_weight(&cpus);
for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) {
PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-07 07:15:52 +00:00
power = pd->table[i].power * nr_cpus;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
if (power > power_limit)
break;
}
freq = pd->table[i - 1].frequency;
freq_qos_update_request(&dtpm_cpu->qos_req, freq);
PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers The milli-Watts precision causes rounding errors while calculating efficiency cost for each OPP. This is especially visible in the 'simple' Energy Model (EM), where the power for each OPP is provided from OPP framework. This can cause some OPPs to be marked inefficient, while using micro-Watts precision that might not happen. Update all EM users which access 'power' field and assume the value is in milli-Watts. Solve also an issue with potential overflow in calculation of energy estimation on 32bit machine. It's needed now since the power value (thus the 'cost' as well) are higher. Example calculation which shows the rounding error and impact: power = 'dyn-power-coeff' * volt_mV * volt_mV * freq_MHz power_a_uW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^6 = 18000 power_a_mW = (100 * 600mW * 600mW * 500MHz) / 10^9 = 18 power_b_uW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^6 = 21961 power_b_mW = (100 * 605mW * 605mW * 600MHz) / 10^9 = 21 max_freq = 2000MHz cost_a_mW = 18 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72 cost_a_uW = 18000 * 2000MHz/500MHz = 72000 cost_b_mW = 21 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 70 // <- artificially better cost_b_uW = 21961 * 2000MHz/600MHz = 73203 The 'cost_b_mW' (which is based on old milli-Watts) is misleadingly better that the 'cost_b_uW' (this patch uses micro-Watts) and such would have impact on the 'inefficient OPPs' information in the Cpufreq framework. This patch set removes the rounding issue. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-07-07 07:15:52 +00:00
power_limit = pd->table[i - 1].power * nr_cpus;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
return power_limit;
}
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load Currently the power consumption is based on the current OPP power assuming the entire performance domain is fully loaded. That gives very gross power estimation and we can do much better by using the load to scale the power consumption. Use the utilization to normalize and scale the power usage over the max possible power. Tested on a rock960 with 2 big CPUS, the power consumption estimation conforms with the expected one. Before this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 After this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 1130000 ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 2 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:11 +00:00
static u64 scale_pd_power_uw(struct cpumask *pd_mask, u64 power)
{
sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util() effective_cpu_util() already has a `int cpu' parameter which allows to retrieve the CPU capacity scale factor (or maximum CPU capacity) inside this function via an arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu). A lot of code calling effective_cpu_util() (or the shim sched_cpu_util()) needs the maximum CPU capacity, i.e. it will call arch_scale_cpu_capacity() already. But not having to pass it into effective_cpu_util() will make the EAS wake-up code easier, especially when the maximum CPU capacity reduced by the thermal pressure is passed through the EAS wake-up functions. Due to the asymmetric CPU capacity support of arm/arm64 architectures, arch_scale_cpu_capacity(int cpu) is a per-CPU variable read access via per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu) on such a system. On all other architectures it is a a compile-time constant (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE). Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-4-vdonnefort@google.com
2022-06-21 09:04:10 +00:00
unsigned long max, sum_util = 0;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load Currently the power consumption is based on the current OPP power assuming the entire performance domain is fully loaded. That gives very gross power estimation and we can do much better by using the load to scale the power consumption. Use the utilization to normalize and scale the power usage over the max possible power. Tested on a rock960 with 2 big CPUS, the power consumption estimation conforms with the expected one. Before this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 After this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 1130000 ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 2 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:11 +00:00
int cpu;
/*
sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util() effective_cpu_util() already has a `int cpu' parameter which allows to retrieve the CPU capacity scale factor (or maximum CPU capacity) inside this function via an arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu). A lot of code calling effective_cpu_util() (or the shim sched_cpu_util()) needs the maximum CPU capacity, i.e. it will call arch_scale_cpu_capacity() already. But not having to pass it into effective_cpu_util() will make the EAS wake-up code easier, especially when the maximum CPU capacity reduced by the thermal pressure is passed through the EAS wake-up functions. Due to the asymmetric CPU capacity support of arm/arm64 architectures, arch_scale_cpu_capacity(int cpu) is a per-CPU variable read access via per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu) on such a system. On all other architectures it is a a compile-time constant (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE). Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-4-vdonnefort@google.com
2022-06-21 09:04:10 +00:00
* The capacity is the same for all CPUs belonging to
* the same perf domain.
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load Currently the power consumption is based on the current OPP power assuming the entire performance domain is fully loaded. That gives very gross power estimation and we can do much better by using the load to scale the power consumption. Use the utilization to normalize and scale the power usage over the max possible power. Tested on a rock960 with 2 big CPUS, the power consumption estimation conforms with the expected one. Before this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 After this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 1130000 ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 2 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:11 +00:00
*/
sched, drivers: Remove max param from effective_cpu_util()/sched_cpu_util() effective_cpu_util() already has a `int cpu' parameter which allows to retrieve the CPU capacity scale factor (or maximum CPU capacity) inside this function via an arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu). A lot of code calling effective_cpu_util() (or the shim sched_cpu_util()) needs the maximum CPU capacity, i.e. it will call arch_scale_cpu_capacity() already. But not having to pass it into effective_cpu_util() will make the EAS wake-up code easier, especially when the maximum CPU capacity reduced by the thermal pressure is passed through the EAS wake-up functions. Due to the asymmetric CPU capacity support of arm/arm64 architectures, arch_scale_cpu_capacity(int cpu) is a per-CPU variable read access via per_cpu(cpu_scale, cpu) on such a system. On all other architectures it is a a compile-time constant (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE). Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-4-vdonnefort@google.com
2022-06-21 09:04:10 +00:00
max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
for_each_cpu_and(cpu, pd_mask, cpu_online_mask)
sum_util += sched_cpu_util(cpu);
return (power * ((sum_util << 10) / max)) >> 10;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load Currently the power consumption is based on the current OPP power assuming the entire performance domain is fully loaded. That gives very gross power estimation and we can do much better by using the load to scale the power consumption. Use the utilization to normalize and scale the power usage over the max possible power. Tested on a rock960 with 2 big CPUS, the power consumption estimation conforms with the expected one. Before this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 After this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 1130000 ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 2 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:11 +00:00
}
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
static u64 get_pd_power_uw(struct dtpm *dtpm)
{
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu = to_dtpm_cpu(dtpm);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
struct em_perf_domain *pd;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load Currently the power consumption is based on the current OPP power assuming the entire performance domain is fully loaded. That gives very gross power estimation and we can do much better by using the load to scale the power consumption. Use the utilization to normalize and scale the power usage over the max possible power. Tested on a rock960 with 2 big CPUS, the power consumption estimation conforms with the expected one. Before this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 After this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 1130000 ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 2 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:11 +00:00
struct cpumask *pd_mask;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
unsigned long freq;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load Currently the power consumption is based on the current OPP power assuming the entire performance domain is fully loaded. That gives very gross power estimation and we can do much better by using the load to scale the power consumption. Use the utilization to normalize and scale the power usage over the max possible power. Tested on a rock960 with 2 big CPUS, the power consumption estimation conforms with the expected one. Before this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 After this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 1130000 ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 2 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:11 +00:00
int i;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
pd = em_cpu_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load Currently the power consumption is based on the current OPP power assuming the entire performance domain is fully loaded. That gives very gross power estimation and we can do much better by using the load to scale the power consumption. Use the utilization to normalize and scale the power usage over the max possible power. Tested on a rock960 with 2 big CPUS, the power consumption estimation conforms with the expected one. Before this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 After this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 1130000 ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 2 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:11 +00:00
pd_mask = em_span_cpus(pd);
freq = cpufreq_quick_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) {
if (pd->table[i].frequency < freq)
continue;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Scale the power with the load Currently the power consumption is based on the current OPP power assuming the entire performance domain is fully loaded. That gives very gross power estimation and we can do much better by using the load to scale the power consumption. Use the utilization to normalize and scale the power usage over the max possible power. Tested on a rock960 with 2 big CPUS, the power consumption estimation conforms with the expected one. Before this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 After this change: ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 1 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 1130000 ~$ ~/dhrystone -t 2 -l 10000& ~$ cat /sys/devices/virtual/powercap/dtpm/dtpm:0/dtpm:0:1/constraint_0_max_power_uw 2260000 Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:11 +00:00
return scale_pd_power_uw(pd_mask, pd->table[i].power *
MICROWATT_PER_MILLIWATT);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
}
return 0;
}
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
static int update_pd_power_uw(struct dtpm *dtpm)
{
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu = to_dtpm_cpu(dtpm);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
struct em_perf_domain *em = em_cpu_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
struct cpumask cpus;
int nr_cpus;
cpumask_and(&cpus, cpu_online_mask, to_cpumask(em->cpus));
nr_cpus = cpumask_weight(&cpus);
dtpm->power_min = em->table[0].power;
dtpm->power_min *= MICROWATT_PER_MILLIWATT;
dtpm->power_min *= nr_cpus;
dtpm->power_max = em->table[em->nr_perf_states - 1].power;
dtpm->power_max *= MICROWATT_PER_MILLIWATT;
dtpm->power_max *= nr_cpus;
return 0;
}
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
static void pd_release(struct dtpm *dtpm)
{
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu = to_dtpm_cpu(dtpm);
powercap/dtpm_cpu: Reset per_cpu variable in the release function The release function does not reset the per cpu variable when it is called. That will prevent creation again as the variable will be already from the previous creation. Fix it by resetting them. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130210210.549877-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-30 21:02:04 +00:00
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
if (freq_qos_request_active(&dtpm_cpu->qos_req))
freq_qos_remove_request(&dtpm_cpu->qos_req);
powercap/dtpm_cpu: Reset per_cpu variable in the release function The release function does not reset the per cpu variable when it is called. That will prevent creation again as the variable will be already from the previous creation. Fix it by resetting them. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130210210.549877-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-30 21:02:04 +00:00
policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(dtpm_cpu->cpu);
if (policy) {
for_each_cpu(dtpm_cpu->cpu, policy->related_cpus)
per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, dtpm_cpu->cpu) = NULL;
}
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
kfree(dtpm_cpu);
}
static struct dtpm_ops dtpm_ops = {
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
.set_power_uw = set_pd_power_limit,
.get_power_uw = get_pd_power_uw,
.update_power_uw = update_pd_power_uw,
.release = pd_release,
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
};
static int cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
{
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
dtpm_cpu = per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, cpu);
powercap: DTPM: Fix suspend failure and kernel warning When the ENERGY_MODEL and DTPM_CPU are enabled but actually without any energy model, at cpu hotplug time, the dead cpuhp callback fails leading to the warning. Actually, the check could be simplified and we only do an action if the dtpm cpu is enabled, otherwise we bail out without error. Fixes: 7a89d7eacf8e ("powercap/drivers/dtpm: Simplify the dtpm table") Reported-by: Kenneth R. Crudup <kenny@panix.com> Tested-by: Kenneth R. Crudup <kenny@panix.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-11-08 06:23:44 +00:00
if (dtpm_cpu)
dtpm_update_power(&dtpm_cpu->dtpm);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
powercap: DTPM: Fix suspend failure and kernel warning When the ENERGY_MODEL and DTPM_CPU are enabled but actually without any energy model, at cpu hotplug time, the dead cpuhp callback fails leading to the warning. Actually, the check could be simplified and we only do an action if the dtpm cpu is enabled, otherwise we bail out without error. Fixes: 7a89d7eacf8e ("powercap/drivers/dtpm: Simplify the dtpm table") Reported-by: Kenneth R. Crudup <kenny@panix.com> Tested-by: Kenneth R. Crudup <kenny@panix.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-11-08 06:23:44 +00:00
return 0;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
}
static int cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU DT initialization support Based on the previous DT changes in the core code, use the 'setup' callback to initialize the CPU DTPM backend. Code is reorganized to stick to the DTPM table description. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128163537.212248-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-28 16:35:35 +00:00
{
struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu;
dtpm_cpu = per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, cpu);
if (dtpm_cpu)
return dtpm_update_power(&dtpm_cpu->dtpm);
return 0;
}
static int __dtpm_cpu_setup(int cpu, struct dtpm *parent)
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
{
struct dtpm_cpu *dtpm_cpu;
struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
struct em_perf_domain *pd;
char name[CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN];
int ret = -ENOMEM;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU DT initialization support Based on the previous DT changes in the core code, use the 'setup' callback to initialize the CPU DTPM backend. Code is reorganized to stick to the DTPM table description. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128163537.212248-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-28 16:35:35 +00:00
dtpm_cpu = per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, cpu);
if (dtpm_cpu)
return 0;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
if (!policy)
return 0;
pd = em_cpu_get(cpu);
powercap: DTPM: Check for Energy Model type The Energy Model power values might be artificial. In such case it's safe to bail out during the registration, since the PowerCap framework supports only micro-Watts. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-03-21 09:57:29 +00:00
if (!pd || em_is_artificial(pd))
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
return -EINVAL;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Fix size of object being allocated The kzalloc allocation for dtpm_cpu is currently allocating the size of the pointer and not the size of the structure. Fix this by using the correct sizeof argument. Addresses-Coverity: ("Wrong sizeof argument") Fixes: 0e8f68d7f048 ("powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-01-04 12:10:53 +00:00
dtpm_cpu = kzalloc(sizeof(*dtpm_cpu), GFP_KERNEL);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
if (!dtpm_cpu)
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
return -ENOMEM;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
dtpm_init(&dtpm_cpu->dtpm, &dtpm_ops);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
dtpm_cpu->cpu = cpu;
for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, cpu) = dtpm_cpu;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "cpu%d-cpufreq", dtpm_cpu->cpu);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU DT initialization support Based on the previous DT changes in the core code, use the 'setup' callback to initialize the CPU DTPM backend. Code is reorganized to stick to the DTPM table description. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128163537.212248-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-28 16:35:35 +00:00
ret = dtpm_register(name, &dtpm_cpu->dtpm, parent);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
if (ret)
goto out_kfree_dtpm_cpu;
ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints,
&dtpm_cpu->qos_req, FREQ_QOS_MAX,
pd->table[pd->nr_perf_states - 1].frequency);
if (ret)
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
goto out_dtpm_unregister;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
return 0;
out_dtpm_unregister:
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Use container_of instead of a private data field The dtpm framework provides an API to allocate a dtpm node. However when a backend dtpm driver needs to allocate a dtpm node it must define its own structure and store the pointer of this structure in the private field of the dtpm structure. It is more elegant to use the container_of macro and add the dtpm structure inside the dtpm backend specific structure. The code will be able to deal properly with the dtpm structure as a generic entity, making all this even more self-encapsulated. The dtpm_alloc() function does no longer make sense as the dtpm structure will be allocated when allocating the device specific dtpm structure. The dtpm_init() is provided instead. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:10 +00:00
dtpm_unregister(&dtpm_cpu->dtpm);
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
dtpm_cpu = NULL;
out_kfree_dtpm_cpu:
for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)
per_cpu(dtpm_per_cpu, cpu) = NULL;
kfree(dtpm_cpu);
return ret;
}
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU DT initialization support Based on the previous DT changes in the core code, use the 'setup' callback to initialize the CPU DTPM backend. Code is reorganized to stick to the DTPM table description. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128163537.212248-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-28 16:35:35 +00:00
static int dtpm_cpu_setup(struct dtpm *dtpm, struct device_node *np)
{
int cpu;
cpu = of_cpu_node_to_id(np);
if (cpu < 0)
return 0;
return __dtpm_cpu_setup(cpu, dtpm);
}
static int dtpm_cpu_init(void)
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
{
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
int ret;
/*
* The callbacks at CPU hotplug time are calling
* dtpm_update_power() which in turns calls update_pd_power().
*
* The function update_pd_power() uses the online mask to
* figure out the power consumption limits.
*
* At CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, the CPU is present in the CPU
* online mask when the cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_online function is
* called, but the CPU is still in the online mask for the
* tear down callback. So the power can not be updated when
* the CPU is unplugged.
*
* At CPUHP_AP_DTPM_CPU_DEAD, the situation is the opposite as
* above. The CPU online mask is not up to date when the CPU
* is plugged in.
*
* For this reason, we need to call the online and offline
* callbacks at different moments when the CPU online mask is
* consistent with the power numbers we want to update.
*/
ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_DTPM_CPU_DEAD, "dtpm_cpu:offline",
NULL, cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_offline);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "dtpm_cpu:online",
cpuhp_dtpm_cpu_online, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code, the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend function to update the power values. The power update function does compute the power characteristics when the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state with these changes. The dtpm node is not removed when the cpu is unplugged. That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more self-encapsulated code. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:07 +00:00
return 0;
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU energy model based support With the powercap dtpm controller, we are able to plug devices with power limitation features in the tree. The following patch introduces the CPU power limitation based on the energy model and the performance states. The power limitation is done at the performance domain level. If some CPUs are unplugged, the corresponding power will be subtracted from the performance domain total power. It is up to the platform to initialize the dtpm tree and add the CPU. Here is an example to create a simple tree with one root node called "pkg" and the CPU's performance domains. static int dtpm_register_pkg(struct dtpm_descr *descr) { struct dtpm *pkg; int ret; pkg = dtpm_alloc(NULL); if (!pkg) return -ENOMEM; ret = dtpm_register(descr->name, pkg, descr->parent); if (ret) return ret; return dtpm_register_cpu(pkg); } static struct dtpm_descr descr = { .name = "pkg", .init = dtpm_register_pkg, }; DTPM_DECLARE(descr); Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-08 16:41:45 +00:00
}
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Simplify the dtpm table The dtpm table is an array of pointers, that forces the user of the table to define initdata along with the declaration of the table entry. It is more efficient to create an array of dtpm structure, so the declaration of the table entry can be done by initializing the different fields. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210312130411.29833-3-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2021-03-12 13:04:09 +00:00
powercap/dtpm_cpu: Add exit function Now that we can destroy the hierarchy, the code must remove what it had put in place at the creation. In our case, the cpu hotplug callbacks. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130210210.549877-6-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-30 21:02:08 +00:00
static void dtpm_cpu_exit(void)
{
cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN);
cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_DTPM_CPU_DEAD);
}
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Convert the init table section to a simple array The init table section is freed after the system booted. However the next changes will make per module the DTPM description, so the table won't be accessible when the module is loaded. In order to fix that, we should move the table to the data section where there are very few entries and that makes strange to add it there. The main goal of the table was to keep self-encapsulated code and we can keep it almost as it by using an array instead. Suggested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128163537.212248-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-28 16:35:33 +00:00
struct dtpm_subsys_ops dtpm_cpu_ops = {
.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
.init = dtpm_cpu_init,
powercap/dtpm_cpu: Add exit function Now that we can destroy the hierarchy, the code must remove what it had put in place at the creation. In our case, the cpu hotplug callbacks. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130210210.549877-6-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-30 21:02:08 +00:00
.exit = dtpm_cpu_exit,
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Add CPU DT initialization support Based on the previous DT changes in the core code, use the 'setup' callback to initialize the CPU DTPM backend. Code is reorganized to stick to the DTPM table description. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128163537.212248-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-28 16:35:35 +00:00
.setup = dtpm_cpu_setup,
powercap/drivers/dtpm: Convert the init table section to a simple array The init table section is freed after the system booted. However the next changes will make per module the DTPM description, so the table won't be accessible when the module is loaded. In order to fix that, we should move the table to the data section where there are very few entries and that makes strange to add it there. The main goal of the table was to keep self-encapsulated code and we can keep it almost as it by using an array instead. Suggested-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128163537.212248-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
2022-01-28 16:35:33 +00:00
};
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink