linux-stable/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c

163 lines
4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/timex.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
/*
* Get CPU information for use by the procfs.
*/
static void show_cpuinfo_core(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c,
unsigned int cpu)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
x86/cpu: Always print SMP information in /proc/cpuinfo Currently show_cpuinfo_core() displays cpu core information only if the number of threads per a whole cores is 2 or larger. However, this condition doesn't care about the number of sockets. For example, this condition doesn't hold on systems with two logical cpus consisting of two sockets and a single core on each socket - yet the topology information would be interesting to see in that case as well. I don't know whether or not there are processors in real world by which such configurations are possible, but at least on vitual machine environments, such configuration can occur, typically when no explicit SMP information is provided in advance. For example, on qemu/KVM, SMP information is specified via -smp command-line option, more specifically, its syntax is: -smp n[,cores=cores][,threads=threads][,sockets=sockets][,maxcpus=maxcpus] If this is not specified, qemu tells configuration with n-sockets, 1-core and 1-thread to the guest machine, on which guest, MP information is not displayed in /proc/cpuinfo. I saw this situation on VMWare guest environment, too. To fix this issue, this patch simply removes the condition because this information is useful even if there's only 1 thread. Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5277D644.4090707@jp.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-11-04 17:15:48 +00:00
seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", c->phys_proc_id);
seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
cpumask_weight(topology_core_cpumask(cpu)));
x86/cpu: Always print SMP information in /proc/cpuinfo Currently show_cpuinfo_core() displays cpu core information only if the number of threads per a whole cores is 2 or larger. However, this condition doesn't care about the number of sockets. For example, this condition doesn't hold on systems with two logical cpus consisting of two sockets and a single core on each socket - yet the topology information would be interesting to see in that case as well. I don't know whether or not there are processors in real world by which such configurations are possible, but at least on vitual machine environments, such configuration can occur, typically when no explicit SMP information is provided in advance. For example, on qemu/KVM, SMP information is specified via -smp command-line option, more specifically, its syntax is: -smp n[,cores=cores][,threads=threads][,sockets=sockets][,maxcpus=maxcpus] If this is not specified, qemu tells configuration with n-sockets, 1-core and 1-thread to the guest machine, on which guest, MP information is not displayed in /proc/cpuinfo. I saw this situation on VMWare guest environment, too. To fix this issue, this patch simply removes the condition because this information is useful even if there's only 1 thread. Signed-off-by: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5277D644.4090707@jp.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-11-04 17:15:48 +00:00
seq_printf(m, "core id\t\t: %d\n", c->cpu_core_id);
seq_printf(m, "cpu cores\t: %d\n", c->booted_cores);
seq_printf(m, "apicid\t\t: %d\n", c->apicid);
seq_printf(m, "initial apicid\t: %d\n", c->initial_apicid);
#endif
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
seq_printf(m,
"fdiv_bug\t: %s\n"
"f00f_bug\t: %s\n"
"coma_bug\t: %s\n"
"fpu\t\t: %s\n"
"fpu_exception\t: %s\n"
"cpuid level\t: %d\n"
x86/cpu: Drop wp_works_ok member of struct cpuinfo_x86 Remove the wp_works_ok member of struct cpuinfo_x86. It's an optimization back from Linux v0.99 times where we had no fixup support yet and did the CR0.WP test via special code in the page fault handler. The < 0 test was an optimization to not do the special casing for each NULL ptr access violation but just for the first one doing the WP test. Today it serves no real purpose as the test no longer needs special code in the page fault handler and the only call side -- mem_init() -- calls it just once, anyway. However, Xen pre-initializes it to 1, to skip the test. Doing the test again for Xen should be no issue at all, as even the commit introducing skipping the test (commit d560bc61575e ("x86, xen: Suppress WP test on Xen")) mentioned it being ban aid only. And, in fact, testing the patch on Xen showed nothing breaks. The pre-fixup times are long gone and with the removal of the fallback handling code in commit a5c2a893dbd4 ("x86, 386 removal: Remove CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK") the kernel requires a working CR0.WP anyway. So just get rid of the "optimization" and do the test unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Cc: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486933932-585-3-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-02-12 21:12:08 +00:00
"wp\t\t: yes\n",
static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_FDIV) ? "yes" : "no",
static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_F00F) ? "yes" : "no",
static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_COMA) ? "yes" : "no",
static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU) ? "yes" : "no",
static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FPU) ? "yes" : "no",
x86/cpu: Drop wp_works_ok member of struct cpuinfo_x86 Remove the wp_works_ok member of struct cpuinfo_x86. It's an optimization back from Linux v0.99 times where we had no fixup support yet and did the CR0.WP test via special code in the page fault handler. The < 0 test was an optimization to not do the special casing for each NULL ptr access violation but just for the first one doing the WP test. Today it serves no real purpose as the test no longer needs special code in the page fault handler and the only call side -- mem_init() -- calls it just once, anyway. However, Xen pre-initializes it to 1, to skip the test. Doing the test again for Xen should be no issue at all, as even the commit introducing skipping the test (commit d560bc61575e ("x86, xen: Suppress WP test on Xen")) mentioned it being ban aid only. And, in fact, testing the patch on Xen showed nothing breaks. The pre-fixup times are long gone and with the removal of the fallback handling code in commit a5c2a893dbd4 ("x86, 386 removal: Remove CONFIG_X86_WP_WORKS_OK") the kernel requires a working CR0.WP anyway. So just get rid of the "optimization" and do the test unconditionally. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> Cc: Arnd Hannemann <hannemann@nets.rwth-aachen.de> Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1486933932-585-3-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2017-02-12 21:12:08 +00:00
c->cpuid_level);
}
#else
static void show_cpuinfo_misc(struct seq_file *m, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
seq_printf(m,
"fpu\t\t: yes\n"
"fpu_exception\t: yes\n"
"cpuid level\t: %d\n"
"wp\t\t: yes\n",
c->cpuid_level);
}
#endif
static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = v;
unsigned int cpu;
int i;
cpu = c->cpu_index;
seq_printf(m, "processor\t: %u\n"
"vendor_id\t: %s\n"
"cpu family\t: %d\n"
"model\t\t: %u\n"
"model name\t: %s\n",
cpu,
c->x86_vendor_id[0] ? c->x86_vendor_id : "unknown",
c->x86,
c->x86_model,
c->x86_model_id[0] ? c->x86_model_id : "unknown");
if (c->x86_mask || c->cpuid_level >= 0)
seq_printf(m, "stepping\t: %d\n", c->x86_mask);
else
seq_puts(m, "stepping\t: unknown\n");
if (c->microcode)
seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode);
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
if (!freq)
freq = cpu_khz;
seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n",
freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));
}
/* Cache size */
if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)
seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
show_cpuinfo_core(m, c, cpu);
show_cpuinfo_misc(m, c);
seq_puts(m, "flags\t\t:");
for (i = 0; i < 32*NCAPINTS; i++)
if (cpu_has(c, i) && x86_cap_flags[i] != NULL)
seq_printf(m, " %s", x86_cap_flags[i]);
seq_puts(m, "\nbugs\t\t:");
for (i = 0; i < 32*NBUGINTS; i++) {
unsigned int bug_bit = 32*NCAPINTS + i;
if (cpu_has_bug(c, bug_bit) && x86_bug_flags[i])
seq_printf(m, " %s", x86_bug_flags[i]);
}
seq_printf(m, "\nbogomips\t: %lu.%02lu\n",
c->loops_per_jiffy/(500000/HZ),
(c->loops_per_jiffy/(5000/HZ)) % 100);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
if (c->x86_tlbsize > 0)
seq_printf(m, "TLB size\t: %d 4K pages\n", c->x86_tlbsize);
#endif
seq_printf(m, "clflush size\t: %u\n", c->x86_clflush_size);
seq_printf(m, "cache_alignment\t: %d\n", c->x86_cache_alignment);
seq_printf(m, "address sizes\t: %u bits physical, %u bits virtual\n",
c->x86_phys_bits, c->x86_virt_bits);
seq_puts(m, "power management:");
for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
if (c->x86_power & (1 << i)) {
if (i < ARRAY_SIZE(x86_power_flags) &&
x86_power_flags[i])
seq_printf(m, "%s%s",
x86_power_flags[i][0] ? " " : "",
x86_power_flags[i]);
else
seq_printf(m, " [%d]", i);
}
}
seq_puts(m, "\n\n");
return 0;
}
static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
{
*pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids)
return &cpu_data(*pos);
return NULL;
}
static void *c_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
(*pos)++;
return c_start(m, pos);
}
static void c_stop(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
{
}
const struct seq_operations cpuinfo_op = {
.start = c_start,
.next = c_next,
.stop = c_stop,
.show = show_cpuinfo,
};