linux-stable/include/linux/trace_recursion.h

229 lines
6.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
#ifndef _LINUX_TRACE_RECURSION_H
#define _LINUX_TRACE_RECURSION_H
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACING
/* Only current can touch trace_recursion */
/*
* For function tracing recursion:
* The order of these bits are important.
*
* When function tracing occurs, the following steps are made:
* If arch does not support a ftrace feature:
* call internal function (uses INTERNAL bits) which calls...
* The function callback, which can use the FTRACE bits to
* check for recursion.
*/
enum {
/* Function recursion bits */
TRACE_FTRACE_BIT,
TRACE_FTRACE_NMI_BIT,
TRACE_FTRACE_IRQ_BIT,
TRACE_FTRACE_SIRQ_BIT,
tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion While writing an email explaining the "bit = 0" logic for a discussion on making ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disable preemption, I discovered a path that makes the "not do the logic if bit is zero" unsafe. The recursion logic is done in hot paths like the function tracer. Thus, any code executed causes noticeable overhead. Thus, tricks are done to try to limit the amount of code executed. This included the recursion testing logic. Having recursion testing is important, as there are many paths that can end up in an infinite recursion cycle when tracing every function in the kernel. Thus protection is needed to prevent that from happening. Because it is OK to recurse due to different running context levels (e.g. an interrupt preempts a trace, and then a trace occurs in the interrupt handler), a set of bits are used to know which context one is in (normal, softirq, irq and NMI). If a recursion occurs in the same level, it is prevented*. Then there are infrastructure levels of recursion as well. When more than one callback is attached to the same function to trace, it calls a loop function to iterate over all the callbacks. Both the callbacks and the loop function have recursion protection. The callbacks use the "ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()" which has a "function" set of context bits to test, and the loop function calls the internal trace_test_and_set_recursion() directly, with an "internal" set of bits. If an architecture does not implement all the features supported by ftrace then the callbacks are never called directly, and the loop function is called instead, which will implement the features of ftrace. Since both the loop function and the callbacks do recursion protection, it was seemed unnecessary to do it in both locations. Thus, a trick was made to have the internal set of recursion bits at a more significant bit location than the function bits. Then, if any of the higher bits were set, the logic of the function bits could be skipped, as any new recursion would first have to go through the loop function. This is true for architectures that do not support all the ftrace features, because all functions being traced must first go through the loop function before going to the callbacks. But this is not true for architectures that support all the ftrace features. That's because the loop function could be called due to two callbacks attached to the same function, but then a recursion function inside the callback could be called that does not share any other callback, and it will be called directly. i.e. traced_function_1: [ more than one callback tracing it ] call loop_func loop_func: trace_recursion set internal bit call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 traced_function_2: [ only traced by above callback ] call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 [ wash, rinse, repeat, BOOM! out of shampoo! ] Thus, the "bit == 0 skip" trick is not safe, unless the loop function is call for all functions. Since we want to encourage architectures to implement all ftrace features, having them slow down due to this extra logic may encourage the maintainers to update to the latest ftrace features. And because this logic is only safe for them, remove it completely. [*] There is on layer of recursion that is allowed, and that is to allow for the transition between interrupt context (normal -> softirq -> irq -> NMI), because a trace may occur before the context update is visible to the trace recursion logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211018154412.09fcad3c@gandalf.local.home Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Cc: =?utf-8?b?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: edc15cafcbfa3 ("tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-18 19:44:12 +00:00
TRACE_FTRACE_TRANSITION_BIT,
tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion While writing an email explaining the "bit = 0" logic for a discussion on making ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disable preemption, I discovered a path that makes the "not do the logic if bit is zero" unsafe. The recursion logic is done in hot paths like the function tracer. Thus, any code executed causes noticeable overhead. Thus, tricks are done to try to limit the amount of code executed. This included the recursion testing logic. Having recursion testing is important, as there are many paths that can end up in an infinite recursion cycle when tracing every function in the kernel. Thus protection is needed to prevent that from happening. Because it is OK to recurse due to different running context levels (e.g. an interrupt preempts a trace, and then a trace occurs in the interrupt handler), a set of bits are used to know which context one is in (normal, softirq, irq and NMI). If a recursion occurs in the same level, it is prevented*. Then there are infrastructure levels of recursion as well. When more than one callback is attached to the same function to trace, it calls a loop function to iterate over all the callbacks. Both the callbacks and the loop function have recursion protection. The callbacks use the "ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()" which has a "function" set of context bits to test, and the loop function calls the internal trace_test_and_set_recursion() directly, with an "internal" set of bits. If an architecture does not implement all the features supported by ftrace then the callbacks are never called directly, and the loop function is called instead, which will implement the features of ftrace. Since both the loop function and the callbacks do recursion protection, it was seemed unnecessary to do it in both locations. Thus, a trick was made to have the internal set of recursion bits at a more significant bit location than the function bits. Then, if any of the higher bits were set, the logic of the function bits could be skipped, as any new recursion would first have to go through the loop function. This is true for architectures that do not support all the ftrace features, because all functions being traced must first go through the loop function before going to the callbacks. But this is not true for architectures that support all the ftrace features. That's because the loop function could be called due to two callbacks attached to the same function, but then a recursion function inside the callback could be called that does not share any other callback, and it will be called directly. i.e. traced_function_1: [ more than one callback tracing it ] call loop_func loop_func: trace_recursion set internal bit call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 traced_function_2: [ only traced by above callback ] call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 [ wash, rinse, repeat, BOOM! out of shampoo! ] Thus, the "bit == 0 skip" trick is not safe, unless the loop function is call for all functions. Since we want to encourage architectures to implement all ftrace features, having them slow down due to this extra logic may encourage the maintainers to update to the latest ftrace features. And because this logic is only safe for them, remove it completely. [*] There is on layer of recursion that is allowed, and that is to allow for the transition between interrupt context (normal -> softirq -> irq -> NMI), because a trace may occur before the context update is visible to the trace recursion logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211018154412.09fcad3c@gandalf.local.home Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Cc: =?utf-8?b?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: edc15cafcbfa3 ("tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-18 19:44:12 +00:00
/* Internal use recursion bits */
TRACE_INTERNAL_BIT,
TRACE_INTERNAL_NMI_BIT,
TRACE_INTERNAL_IRQ_BIT,
TRACE_INTERNAL_SIRQ_BIT,
tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion While writing an email explaining the "bit = 0" logic for a discussion on making ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disable preemption, I discovered a path that makes the "not do the logic if bit is zero" unsafe. The recursion logic is done in hot paths like the function tracer. Thus, any code executed causes noticeable overhead. Thus, tricks are done to try to limit the amount of code executed. This included the recursion testing logic. Having recursion testing is important, as there are many paths that can end up in an infinite recursion cycle when tracing every function in the kernel. Thus protection is needed to prevent that from happening. Because it is OK to recurse due to different running context levels (e.g. an interrupt preempts a trace, and then a trace occurs in the interrupt handler), a set of bits are used to know which context one is in (normal, softirq, irq and NMI). If a recursion occurs in the same level, it is prevented*. Then there are infrastructure levels of recursion as well. When more than one callback is attached to the same function to trace, it calls a loop function to iterate over all the callbacks. Both the callbacks and the loop function have recursion protection. The callbacks use the "ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()" which has a "function" set of context bits to test, and the loop function calls the internal trace_test_and_set_recursion() directly, with an "internal" set of bits. If an architecture does not implement all the features supported by ftrace then the callbacks are never called directly, and the loop function is called instead, which will implement the features of ftrace. Since both the loop function and the callbacks do recursion protection, it was seemed unnecessary to do it in both locations. Thus, a trick was made to have the internal set of recursion bits at a more significant bit location than the function bits. Then, if any of the higher bits were set, the logic of the function bits could be skipped, as any new recursion would first have to go through the loop function. This is true for architectures that do not support all the ftrace features, because all functions being traced must first go through the loop function before going to the callbacks. But this is not true for architectures that support all the ftrace features. That's because the loop function could be called due to two callbacks attached to the same function, but then a recursion function inside the callback could be called that does not share any other callback, and it will be called directly. i.e. traced_function_1: [ more than one callback tracing it ] call loop_func loop_func: trace_recursion set internal bit call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 traced_function_2: [ only traced by above callback ] call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 [ wash, rinse, repeat, BOOM! out of shampoo! ] Thus, the "bit == 0 skip" trick is not safe, unless the loop function is call for all functions. Since we want to encourage architectures to implement all ftrace features, having them slow down due to this extra logic may encourage the maintainers to update to the latest ftrace features. And because this logic is only safe for them, remove it completely. [*] There is on layer of recursion that is allowed, and that is to allow for the transition between interrupt context (normal -> softirq -> irq -> NMI), because a trace may occur before the context update is visible to the trace recursion logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211018154412.09fcad3c@gandalf.local.home Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Cc: =?utf-8?b?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: edc15cafcbfa3 ("tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-18 19:44:12 +00:00
TRACE_INTERNAL_TRANSITION_BIT,
TRACE_BRANCH_BIT,
/*
* Abuse of the trace_recursion.
* As we need a way to maintain state if we are tracing the function
* graph in irq because we want to trace a particular function that
* was called in irq context but we have irq tracing off. Since this
* can only be modified by current, we can reuse trace_recursion.
*/
TRACE_IRQ_BIT,
/* Set if the function is in the set_graph_function file */
TRACE_GRAPH_BIT,
/*
* In the very unlikely case that an interrupt came in
* at a start of graph tracing, and we want to trace
* the function in that interrupt, the depth can be greater
* than zero, because of the preempted start of a previous
* trace. In an even more unlikely case, depth could be 2
* if a softirq interrupted the start of graph tracing,
* followed by an interrupt preempting a start of graph
* tracing in the softirq, and depth can even be 3
* if an NMI came in at the start of an interrupt function
* that preempted a softirq start of a function that
* preempted normal context!!!! Luckily, it can't be
* greater than 3, so the next two bits are a mask
* of what the depth is when we set TRACE_GRAPH_BIT
*/
TRACE_GRAPH_DEPTH_START_BIT,
TRACE_GRAPH_DEPTH_END_BIT,
/*
* To implement set_graph_notrace, if this bit is set, we ignore
* function graph tracing of called functions, until the return
* function is called to clear it.
*/
TRACE_GRAPH_NOTRACE_BIT,
ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion This adds CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION that will record to a file "recursed_functions" all the functions that caused recursion while a callback to the function tracer was running. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106023548.102375687@goodmis.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2020-11-06 02:32:46 +00:00
/* Used to prevent recursion recording from recursing. */
TRACE_RECORD_RECURSION_BIT,
};
#define trace_recursion_set(bit) do { (current)->trace_recursion |= (1<<(bit)); } while (0)
#define trace_recursion_clear(bit) do { (current)->trace_recursion &= ~(1<<(bit)); } while (0)
#define trace_recursion_test(bit) ((current)->trace_recursion & (1<<(bit)))
#define trace_recursion_depth() \
(((current)->trace_recursion >> TRACE_GRAPH_DEPTH_START_BIT) & 3)
#define trace_recursion_set_depth(depth) \
do { \
current->trace_recursion &= \
~(3 << TRACE_GRAPH_DEPTH_START_BIT); \
current->trace_recursion |= \
((depth) & 3) << TRACE_GRAPH_DEPTH_START_BIT; \
} while (0)
#define TRACE_CONTEXT_BITS 4
#define TRACE_FTRACE_START TRACE_FTRACE_BIT
#define TRACE_LIST_START TRACE_INTERNAL_BIT
tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion While writing an email explaining the "bit = 0" logic for a discussion on making ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disable preemption, I discovered a path that makes the "not do the logic if bit is zero" unsafe. The recursion logic is done in hot paths like the function tracer. Thus, any code executed causes noticeable overhead. Thus, tricks are done to try to limit the amount of code executed. This included the recursion testing logic. Having recursion testing is important, as there are many paths that can end up in an infinite recursion cycle when tracing every function in the kernel. Thus protection is needed to prevent that from happening. Because it is OK to recurse due to different running context levels (e.g. an interrupt preempts a trace, and then a trace occurs in the interrupt handler), a set of bits are used to know which context one is in (normal, softirq, irq and NMI). If a recursion occurs in the same level, it is prevented*. Then there are infrastructure levels of recursion as well. When more than one callback is attached to the same function to trace, it calls a loop function to iterate over all the callbacks. Both the callbacks and the loop function have recursion protection. The callbacks use the "ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()" which has a "function" set of context bits to test, and the loop function calls the internal trace_test_and_set_recursion() directly, with an "internal" set of bits. If an architecture does not implement all the features supported by ftrace then the callbacks are never called directly, and the loop function is called instead, which will implement the features of ftrace. Since both the loop function and the callbacks do recursion protection, it was seemed unnecessary to do it in both locations. Thus, a trick was made to have the internal set of recursion bits at a more significant bit location than the function bits. Then, if any of the higher bits were set, the logic of the function bits could be skipped, as any new recursion would first have to go through the loop function. This is true for architectures that do not support all the ftrace features, because all functions being traced must first go through the loop function before going to the callbacks. But this is not true for architectures that support all the ftrace features. That's because the loop function could be called due to two callbacks attached to the same function, but then a recursion function inside the callback could be called that does not share any other callback, and it will be called directly. i.e. traced_function_1: [ more than one callback tracing it ] call loop_func loop_func: trace_recursion set internal bit call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 traced_function_2: [ only traced by above callback ] call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 [ wash, rinse, repeat, BOOM! out of shampoo! ] Thus, the "bit == 0 skip" trick is not safe, unless the loop function is call for all functions. Since we want to encourage architectures to implement all ftrace features, having them slow down due to this extra logic may encourage the maintainers to update to the latest ftrace features. And because this logic is only safe for them, remove it completely. [*] There is on layer of recursion that is allowed, and that is to allow for the transition between interrupt context (normal -> softirq -> irq -> NMI), because a trace may occur before the context update is visible to the trace recursion logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211018154412.09fcad3c@gandalf.local.home Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Cc: =?utf-8?b?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: edc15cafcbfa3 ("tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-18 19:44:12 +00:00
#define TRACE_CONTEXT_MASK ((1 << (TRACE_LIST_START + TRACE_CONTEXT_BITS)) - 1)
/*
* Used for setting context
* NMI = 0
* IRQ = 1
* SOFTIRQ = 2
* NORMAL = 3
*/
enum {
TRACE_CTX_NMI,
TRACE_CTX_IRQ,
TRACE_CTX_SOFTIRQ,
TRACE_CTX_NORMAL,
tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion While writing an email explaining the "bit = 0" logic for a discussion on making ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disable preemption, I discovered a path that makes the "not do the logic if bit is zero" unsafe. The recursion logic is done in hot paths like the function tracer. Thus, any code executed causes noticeable overhead. Thus, tricks are done to try to limit the amount of code executed. This included the recursion testing logic. Having recursion testing is important, as there are many paths that can end up in an infinite recursion cycle when tracing every function in the kernel. Thus protection is needed to prevent that from happening. Because it is OK to recurse due to different running context levels (e.g. an interrupt preempts a trace, and then a trace occurs in the interrupt handler), a set of bits are used to know which context one is in (normal, softirq, irq and NMI). If a recursion occurs in the same level, it is prevented*. Then there are infrastructure levels of recursion as well. When more than one callback is attached to the same function to trace, it calls a loop function to iterate over all the callbacks. Both the callbacks and the loop function have recursion protection. The callbacks use the "ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()" which has a "function" set of context bits to test, and the loop function calls the internal trace_test_and_set_recursion() directly, with an "internal" set of bits. If an architecture does not implement all the features supported by ftrace then the callbacks are never called directly, and the loop function is called instead, which will implement the features of ftrace. Since both the loop function and the callbacks do recursion protection, it was seemed unnecessary to do it in both locations. Thus, a trick was made to have the internal set of recursion bits at a more significant bit location than the function bits. Then, if any of the higher bits were set, the logic of the function bits could be skipped, as any new recursion would first have to go through the loop function. This is true for architectures that do not support all the ftrace features, because all functions being traced must first go through the loop function before going to the callbacks. But this is not true for architectures that support all the ftrace features. That's because the loop function could be called due to two callbacks attached to the same function, but then a recursion function inside the callback could be called that does not share any other callback, and it will be called directly. i.e. traced_function_1: [ more than one callback tracing it ] call loop_func loop_func: trace_recursion set internal bit call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 traced_function_2: [ only traced by above callback ] call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 [ wash, rinse, repeat, BOOM! out of shampoo! ] Thus, the "bit == 0 skip" trick is not safe, unless the loop function is call for all functions. Since we want to encourage architectures to implement all ftrace features, having them slow down due to this extra logic may encourage the maintainers to update to the latest ftrace features. And because this logic is only safe for them, remove it completely. [*] There is on layer of recursion that is allowed, and that is to allow for the transition between interrupt context (normal -> softirq -> irq -> NMI), because a trace may occur before the context update is visible to the trace recursion logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211018154412.09fcad3c@gandalf.local.home Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Cc: =?utf-8?b?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: edc15cafcbfa3 ("tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-18 19:44:12 +00:00
TRACE_CTX_TRANSITION,
};
static __always_inline int trace_get_context_bit(void)
{
unsigned char bit = interrupt_context_level();
return TRACE_CTX_NORMAL - bit;
}
ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion This adds CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION that will record to a file "recursed_functions" all the functions that caused recursion while a callback to the function tracer was running. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106023548.102375687@goodmis.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2020-11-06 02:32:46 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION
extern void ftrace_record_recursion(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip);
# define do_ftrace_record_recursion(ip, pip) \
do { \
if (!trace_recursion_test(TRACE_RECORD_RECURSION_BIT)) { \
trace_recursion_set(TRACE_RECORD_RECURSION_BIT); \
ftrace_record_recursion(ip, pip); \
trace_recursion_clear(TRACE_RECORD_RECURSION_BIT); \
} \
} while (0)
#else
# define do_ftrace_record_recursion(ip, pip) do { } while (0)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_NO_INSTR
# define trace_warn_on_no_rcu(ip) \
({ \
bool __ret = !rcu_is_watching(); \
if (__ret && !trace_recursion_test(TRACE_RECORD_RECURSION_BIT)) { \
trace_recursion_set(TRACE_RECORD_RECURSION_BIT); \
WARN_ONCE(true, "RCU not on for: %pS\n", (void *)ip); \
trace_recursion_clear(TRACE_RECORD_RECURSION_BIT); \
} \
__ret; \
})
#else
# define trace_warn_on_no_rcu(ip) false
#endif
ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked As the documentation explained, ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() and ftrace_test_recursion_unlock() were supposed to disable and enable preemption properly, however currently this work is done outside of the function, which could be missing by mistake. And since the internal using of trace_test_and_set_recursion() and trace_clear_recursion() also require preemption disabled, we can just merge the logical. This patch will make sure the preemption has been disabled when trace_test_and_set_recursion() return bit >= 0, and trace_clear_recursion() will enable the preemption if previously enabled. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/13bde807-779c-aa4c-0672-20515ae365ea@linux.alibaba.com CC: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> CC: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> [ Removed extra line in comment - SDR ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-27 03:14:44 +00:00
/*
* Preemption is promised to be disabled when return bit >= 0.
*/
ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion This adds CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION that will record to a file "recursed_functions" all the functions that caused recursion while a callback to the function tracer was running. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106023548.102375687@goodmis.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2020-11-06 02:32:46 +00:00
static __always_inline int trace_test_and_set_recursion(unsigned long ip, unsigned long pip,
tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion While writing an email explaining the "bit = 0" logic for a discussion on making ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disable preemption, I discovered a path that makes the "not do the logic if bit is zero" unsafe. The recursion logic is done in hot paths like the function tracer. Thus, any code executed causes noticeable overhead. Thus, tricks are done to try to limit the amount of code executed. This included the recursion testing logic. Having recursion testing is important, as there are many paths that can end up in an infinite recursion cycle when tracing every function in the kernel. Thus protection is needed to prevent that from happening. Because it is OK to recurse due to different running context levels (e.g. an interrupt preempts a trace, and then a trace occurs in the interrupt handler), a set of bits are used to know which context one is in (normal, softirq, irq and NMI). If a recursion occurs in the same level, it is prevented*. Then there are infrastructure levels of recursion as well. When more than one callback is attached to the same function to trace, it calls a loop function to iterate over all the callbacks. Both the callbacks and the loop function have recursion protection. The callbacks use the "ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()" which has a "function" set of context bits to test, and the loop function calls the internal trace_test_and_set_recursion() directly, with an "internal" set of bits. If an architecture does not implement all the features supported by ftrace then the callbacks are never called directly, and the loop function is called instead, which will implement the features of ftrace. Since both the loop function and the callbacks do recursion protection, it was seemed unnecessary to do it in both locations. Thus, a trick was made to have the internal set of recursion bits at a more significant bit location than the function bits. Then, if any of the higher bits were set, the logic of the function bits could be skipped, as any new recursion would first have to go through the loop function. This is true for architectures that do not support all the ftrace features, because all functions being traced must first go through the loop function before going to the callbacks. But this is not true for architectures that support all the ftrace features. That's because the loop function could be called due to two callbacks attached to the same function, but then a recursion function inside the callback could be called that does not share any other callback, and it will be called directly. i.e. traced_function_1: [ more than one callback tracing it ] call loop_func loop_func: trace_recursion set internal bit call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 traced_function_2: [ only traced by above callback ] call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 [ wash, rinse, repeat, BOOM! out of shampoo! ] Thus, the "bit == 0 skip" trick is not safe, unless the loop function is call for all functions. Since we want to encourage architectures to implement all ftrace features, having them slow down due to this extra logic may encourage the maintainers to update to the latest ftrace features. And because this logic is only safe for them, remove it completely. [*] There is on layer of recursion that is allowed, and that is to allow for the transition between interrupt context (normal -> softirq -> irq -> NMI), because a trace may occur before the context update is visible to the trace recursion logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211018154412.09fcad3c@gandalf.local.home Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Cc: =?utf-8?b?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: edc15cafcbfa3 ("tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-18 19:44:12 +00:00
int start)
{
unsigned int val = READ_ONCE(current->trace_recursion);
int bit;
if (trace_warn_on_no_rcu(ip))
return -1;
bit = trace_get_context_bit() + start;
if (unlikely(val & (1 << bit))) {
/*
* If an interrupt occurs during a trace, and another trace
* happens in that interrupt but before the preempt_count is
* updated to reflect the new interrupt context, then this
* will think a recursion occurred, and the event will be dropped.
* Let a single instance happen via the TRANSITION_BIT to
* not drop those events.
*/
tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion While writing an email explaining the "bit = 0" logic for a discussion on making ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disable preemption, I discovered a path that makes the "not do the logic if bit is zero" unsafe. The recursion logic is done in hot paths like the function tracer. Thus, any code executed causes noticeable overhead. Thus, tricks are done to try to limit the amount of code executed. This included the recursion testing logic. Having recursion testing is important, as there are many paths that can end up in an infinite recursion cycle when tracing every function in the kernel. Thus protection is needed to prevent that from happening. Because it is OK to recurse due to different running context levels (e.g. an interrupt preempts a trace, and then a trace occurs in the interrupt handler), a set of bits are used to know which context one is in (normal, softirq, irq and NMI). If a recursion occurs in the same level, it is prevented*. Then there are infrastructure levels of recursion as well. When more than one callback is attached to the same function to trace, it calls a loop function to iterate over all the callbacks. Both the callbacks and the loop function have recursion protection. The callbacks use the "ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()" which has a "function" set of context bits to test, and the loop function calls the internal trace_test_and_set_recursion() directly, with an "internal" set of bits. If an architecture does not implement all the features supported by ftrace then the callbacks are never called directly, and the loop function is called instead, which will implement the features of ftrace. Since both the loop function and the callbacks do recursion protection, it was seemed unnecessary to do it in both locations. Thus, a trick was made to have the internal set of recursion bits at a more significant bit location than the function bits. Then, if any of the higher bits were set, the logic of the function bits could be skipped, as any new recursion would first have to go through the loop function. This is true for architectures that do not support all the ftrace features, because all functions being traced must first go through the loop function before going to the callbacks. But this is not true for architectures that support all the ftrace features. That's because the loop function could be called due to two callbacks attached to the same function, but then a recursion function inside the callback could be called that does not share any other callback, and it will be called directly. i.e. traced_function_1: [ more than one callback tracing it ] call loop_func loop_func: trace_recursion set internal bit call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 traced_function_2: [ only traced by above callback ] call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 [ wash, rinse, repeat, BOOM! out of shampoo! ] Thus, the "bit == 0 skip" trick is not safe, unless the loop function is call for all functions. Since we want to encourage architectures to implement all ftrace features, having them slow down due to this extra logic may encourage the maintainers to update to the latest ftrace features. And because this logic is only safe for them, remove it completely. [*] There is on layer of recursion that is allowed, and that is to allow for the transition between interrupt context (normal -> softirq -> irq -> NMI), because a trace may occur before the context update is visible to the trace recursion logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211018154412.09fcad3c@gandalf.local.home Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Cc: =?utf-8?b?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: edc15cafcbfa3 ("tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-18 19:44:12 +00:00
bit = TRACE_CTX_TRANSITION + start;
if (val & (1 << bit)) {
ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion This adds CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION that will record to a file "recursed_functions" all the functions that caused recursion while a callback to the function tracer was running. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106023548.102375687@goodmis.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2020-11-06 02:32:46 +00:00
do_ftrace_record_recursion(ip, pip);
return -1;
ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion This adds CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION that will record to a file "recursed_functions" all the functions that caused recursion while a callback to the function tracer was running. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106023548.102375687@goodmis.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2020-11-06 02:32:46 +00:00
}
}
val |= 1 << bit;
current->trace_recursion = val;
barrier();
ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked As the documentation explained, ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() and ftrace_test_recursion_unlock() were supposed to disable and enable preemption properly, however currently this work is done outside of the function, which could be missing by mistake. And since the internal using of trace_test_and_set_recursion() and trace_clear_recursion() also require preemption disabled, we can just merge the logical. This patch will make sure the preemption has been disabled when trace_test_and_set_recursion() return bit >= 0, and trace_clear_recursion() will enable the preemption if previously enabled. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/13bde807-779c-aa4c-0672-20515ae365ea@linux.alibaba.com CC: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> CC: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> [ Removed extra line in comment - SDR ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-27 03:14:44 +00:00
preempt_disable_notrace();
tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion While writing an email explaining the "bit = 0" logic for a discussion on making ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disable preemption, I discovered a path that makes the "not do the logic if bit is zero" unsafe. The recursion logic is done in hot paths like the function tracer. Thus, any code executed causes noticeable overhead. Thus, tricks are done to try to limit the amount of code executed. This included the recursion testing logic. Having recursion testing is important, as there are many paths that can end up in an infinite recursion cycle when tracing every function in the kernel. Thus protection is needed to prevent that from happening. Because it is OK to recurse due to different running context levels (e.g. an interrupt preempts a trace, and then a trace occurs in the interrupt handler), a set of bits are used to know which context one is in (normal, softirq, irq and NMI). If a recursion occurs in the same level, it is prevented*. Then there are infrastructure levels of recursion as well. When more than one callback is attached to the same function to trace, it calls a loop function to iterate over all the callbacks. Both the callbacks and the loop function have recursion protection. The callbacks use the "ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()" which has a "function" set of context bits to test, and the loop function calls the internal trace_test_and_set_recursion() directly, with an "internal" set of bits. If an architecture does not implement all the features supported by ftrace then the callbacks are never called directly, and the loop function is called instead, which will implement the features of ftrace. Since both the loop function and the callbacks do recursion protection, it was seemed unnecessary to do it in both locations. Thus, a trick was made to have the internal set of recursion bits at a more significant bit location than the function bits. Then, if any of the higher bits were set, the logic of the function bits could be skipped, as any new recursion would first have to go through the loop function. This is true for architectures that do not support all the ftrace features, because all functions being traced must first go through the loop function before going to the callbacks. But this is not true for architectures that support all the ftrace features. That's because the loop function could be called due to two callbacks attached to the same function, but then a recursion function inside the callback could be called that does not share any other callback, and it will be called directly. i.e. traced_function_1: [ more than one callback tracing it ] call loop_func loop_func: trace_recursion set internal bit call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 traced_function_2: [ only traced by above callback ] call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 [ wash, rinse, repeat, BOOM! out of shampoo! ] Thus, the "bit == 0 skip" trick is not safe, unless the loop function is call for all functions. Since we want to encourage architectures to implement all ftrace features, having them slow down due to this extra logic may encourage the maintainers to update to the latest ftrace features. And because this logic is only safe for them, remove it completely. [*] There is on layer of recursion that is allowed, and that is to allow for the transition between interrupt context (normal -> softirq -> irq -> NMI), because a trace may occur before the context update is visible to the trace recursion logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211018154412.09fcad3c@gandalf.local.home Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Cc: =?utf-8?b?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: edc15cafcbfa3 ("tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-18 19:44:12 +00:00
return bit;
}
ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked As the documentation explained, ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() and ftrace_test_recursion_unlock() were supposed to disable and enable preemption properly, however currently this work is done outside of the function, which could be missing by mistake. And since the internal using of trace_test_and_set_recursion() and trace_clear_recursion() also require preemption disabled, we can just merge the logical. This patch will make sure the preemption has been disabled when trace_test_and_set_recursion() return bit >= 0, and trace_clear_recursion() will enable the preemption if previously enabled. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/13bde807-779c-aa4c-0672-20515ae365ea@linux.alibaba.com CC: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> CC: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> [ Removed extra line in comment - SDR ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-27 03:14:44 +00:00
/*
* Preemption will be enabled (if it was previously enabled).
*/
static __always_inline void trace_clear_recursion(int bit)
{
ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked As the documentation explained, ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() and ftrace_test_recursion_unlock() were supposed to disable and enable preemption properly, however currently this work is done outside of the function, which could be missing by mistake. And since the internal using of trace_test_and_set_recursion() and trace_clear_recursion() also require preemption disabled, we can just merge the logical. This patch will make sure the preemption has been disabled when trace_test_and_set_recursion() return bit >= 0, and trace_clear_recursion() will enable the preemption if previously enabled. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/13bde807-779c-aa4c-0672-20515ae365ea@linux.alibaba.com CC: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> CC: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> [ Removed extra line in comment - SDR ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-27 03:14:44 +00:00
preempt_enable_notrace();
barrier();
trace_recursion_clear(bit);
}
/**
* ftrace_test_recursion_trylock - tests for recursion in same context
*
* Use this for ftrace callbacks. This will detect if the function
* tracing recursed in the same context (normal vs interrupt),
*
* Returns: -1 if a recursion happened.
ftrace: disable preemption when recursion locked As the documentation explained, ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() and ftrace_test_recursion_unlock() were supposed to disable and enable preemption properly, however currently this work is done outside of the function, which could be missing by mistake. And since the internal using of trace_test_and_set_recursion() and trace_clear_recursion() also require preemption disabled, we can just merge the logical. This patch will make sure the preemption has been disabled when trace_test_and_set_recursion() return bit >= 0, and trace_clear_recursion() will enable the preemption if previously enabled. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/13bde807-779c-aa4c-0672-20515ae365ea@linux.alibaba.com CC: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> CC: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> [ Removed extra line in comment - SDR ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-27 03:14:44 +00:00
* >= 0 if no recursion.
*/
ftrace: Add recording of functions that caused recursion This adds CONFIG_FTRACE_RECORD_RECURSION that will record to a file "recursed_functions" all the functions that caused recursion while a callback to the function tracer was running. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201106023548.102375687@goodmis.org Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2020-11-06 02:32:46 +00:00
static __always_inline int ftrace_test_recursion_trylock(unsigned long ip,
unsigned long parent_ip)
{
tracing: Have all levels of checks prevent recursion While writing an email explaining the "bit = 0" logic for a discussion on making ftrace_test_recursion_trylock() disable preemption, I discovered a path that makes the "not do the logic if bit is zero" unsafe. The recursion logic is done in hot paths like the function tracer. Thus, any code executed causes noticeable overhead. Thus, tricks are done to try to limit the amount of code executed. This included the recursion testing logic. Having recursion testing is important, as there are many paths that can end up in an infinite recursion cycle when tracing every function in the kernel. Thus protection is needed to prevent that from happening. Because it is OK to recurse due to different running context levels (e.g. an interrupt preempts a trace, and then a trace occurs in the interrupt handler), a set of bits are used to know which context one is in (normal, softirq, irq and NMI). If a recursion occurs in the same level, it is prevented*. Then there are infrastructure levels of recursion as well. When more than one callback is attached to the same function to trace, it calls a loop function to iterate over all the callbacks. Both the callbacks and the loop function have recursion protection. The callbacks use the "ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()" which has a "function" set of context bits to test, and the loop function calls the internal trace_test_and_set_recursion() directly, with an "internal" set of bits. If an architecture does not implement all the features supported by ftrace then the callbacks are never called directly, and the loop function is called instead, which will implement the features of ftrace. Since both the loop function and the callbacks do recursion protection, it was seemed unnecessary to do it in both locations. Thus, a trick was made to have the internal set of recursion bits at a more significant bit location than the function bits. Then, if any of the higher bits were set, the logic of the function bits could be skipped, as any new recursion would first have to go through the loop function. This is true for architectures that do not support all the ftrace features, because all functions being traced must first go through the loop function before going to the callbacks. But this is not true for architectures that support all the ftrace features. That's because the loop function could be called due to two callbacks attached to the same function, but then a recursion function inside the callback could be called that does not share any other callback, and it will be called directly. i.e. traced_function_1: [ more than one callback tracing it ] call loop_func loop_func: trace_recursion set internal bit call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 traced_function_2: [ only traced by above callback ] call callback callback: trace_recursion [ skipped because internal bit is set, return 0 ] call traced_function_2 [ wash, rinse, repeat, BOOM! out of shampoo! ] Thus, the "bit == 0 skip" trick is not safe, unless the loop function is call for all functions. Since we want to encourage architectures to implement all ftrace features, having them slow down due to this extra logic may encourage the maintainers to update to the latest ftrace features. And because this logic is only safe for them, remove it completely. [*] There is on layer of recursion that is allowed, and that is to allow for the transition between interrupt context (normal -> softirq -> irq -> NMI), because a trace may occur before the context update is visible to the trace recursion logic. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/609b565a-ed6e-a1da-f025-166691b5d994@linux.alibaba.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211018154412.09fcad3c@gandalf.local.home Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Cc: =?utf-8?b?546L6LSH?= <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: edc15cafcbfa3 ("tracing: Avoid unnecessary multiple recursion checks") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2021-10-18 19:44:12 +00:00
return trace_test_and_set_recursion(ip, parent_ip, TRACE_FTRACE_START);
}
/**
* ftrace_test_recursion_unlock - called when function callback is complete
* @bit: The return of a successful ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()
*
* This is used at the end of a ftrace callback.
*/
static __always_inline void ftrace_test_recursion_unlock(int bit)
{
trace_clear_recursion(bit);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
#endif /* _LINUX_TRACE_RECURSION_H */