linux-stable/include/linux/hugetlb_cgroup.h

283 lines
7.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright IBM Corporation, 2012
* Author Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of version 2.1 of the GNU Lesser General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
*
*/
#ifndef _LINUX_HUGETLB_CGROUP_H
#define _LINUX_HUGETLB_CGROUP_H
#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
struct hugetlb_cgroup;
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 04:11:21 +00:00
struct resv_map;
struct file_region;
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 04:11:21 +00:00
mm: hugetlb: gather discrete indexes of tail page For HugeTLB page, there are more metadata to save in the struct page. But the head struct page cannot meet our needs, so we have to abuse other tail struct page to store the metadata. In order to avoid conflicts caused by subsequent use of more tail struct pages, we can gather these discrete indexes of tail struct page. In this case, it will be easier to add a new tail page index later. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210510030027.56044-4-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Tested-by: Chen Huang <chenhuang5@huawei.com> Tested-by: Bodeddula Balasubramaniam <bodeddub@amazon.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-07-01 01:47:09 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_HUGETLB
/*
* Minimum page order trackable by hugetlb cgroup.
mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page Patch series "mm,huge,rmap: unify and speed up compound mapcounts". This patch (of 3): We want to declare one more int in the first tail of a compound page: that first tail page being valuable property, since every compound page has a first tail, but perhaps no more than that. No problem on 64-bit: there is already space for it. No problem with 32-bit THPs: 5.18 commit 5232c63f46fd ("mm: Make compound_pincount always available") kindly cleared the space for it, apparently not realizing that only 64-bit architectures enable CONFIG_THP_SWAP (whose use of tail page->private might conflict) - but make sure of that in its Kconfig. But hugetlb pages use tail page->private of the first tail page for a subpool pointer, which will conflict; and they also use page->private of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th tails. Undo "mm: add private field of first tail to struct page and struct folio"'s recent addition of private_1 to the folio tail: instead add hugetlb_subpool, hugetlb_cgroup, hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, hugetlb_hwpoison to a second tail page of the folio: THP has long been using several fields of that tail, so make better use of it for hugetlb too. This is not how a generic folio should be declared in future, but it is an effective transitional way to make use of it. Delete the SUBPAGE_INDEX stuff, but keep __NR_USED_SUBPAGE: now 3. [hughd@google.com: prefix folio's page_1 and page_2 with double underscore, give folio's _flags_2 and _head_2 a line documentation each] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9e2cb6b-5b58-d3f2-b5ee-5f8a14e8f10@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5f52de70-975-e94f-f141-543765736181@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3818cc9a-9999-d064-d778-9c94c5911e6@google.com Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-03 01:48:45 +00:00
* At least 3 pages are necessary for all the tracking information.
* The second tail page contains all of the hugetlb-specific fields.
*/
mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page Patch series "mm,huge,rmap: unify and speed up compound mapcounts". This patch (of 3): We want to declare one more int in the first tail of a compound page: that first tail page being valuable property, since every compound page has a first tail, but perhaps no more than that. No problem on 64-bit: there is already space for it. No problem with 32-bit THPs: 5.18 commit 5232c63f46fd ("mm: Make compound_pincount always available") kindly cleared the space for it, apparently not realizing that only 64-bit architectures enable CONFIG_THP_SWAP (whose use of tail page->private might conflict) - but make sure of that in its Kconfig. But hugetlb pages use tail page->private of the first tail page for a subpool pointer, which will conflict; and they also use page->private of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th tails. Undo "mm: add private field of first tail to struct page and struct folio"'s recent addition of private_1 to the folio tail: instead add hugetlb_subpool, hugetlb_cgroup, hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, hugetlb_hwpoison to a second tail page of the folio: THP has long been using several fields of that tail, so make better use of it for hugetlb too. This is not how a generic folio should be declared in future, but it is an effective transitional way to make use of it. Delete the SUBPAGE_INDEX stuff, but keep __NR_USED_SUBPAGE: now 3. [hughd@google.com: prefix folio's page_1 and page_2 with double underscore, give folio's _flags_2 and _head_2 a line documentation each] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9e2cb6b-5b58-d3f2-b5ee-5f8a14e8f10@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5f52de70-975-e94f-f141-543765736181@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3818cc9a-9999-d064-d778-9c94c5911e6@google.com Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-03 01:48:45 +00:00
#define HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER order_base_2(__NR_USED_SUBPAGE)
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 04:11:21 +00:00
enum hugetlb_memory_event {
HUGETLB_MAX,
HUGETLB_NR_MEMORY_EVENTS,
};
hugetlb: add hugetlb.*.numa_stat file For hugetlb backed jobs/VMs it's critical to understand the numa information for the memory backing these jobs to deliver optimal performance. Currently this technically can be queried from /proc/self/numa_maps, but there are significant issues with that. Namely: 1. Memory can be mapped or unmapped. 2. numa_maps are per process and need to be aggregated across all processes in the cgroup. For shared memory this is more involved as the userspace needs to make sure it doesn't double count shared mappings. 3. I believe querying numa_maps needs to hold the mmap_lock which adds to the contention on this lock. For these reasons I propose simply adding hugetlb.*.numa_stat file, which shows the numa information of the cgroup similarly to memory.numa_stat. On cgroup-v2: cat /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/test/hugetlb.2MB.numa_stat total=2097152 N0=2097152 N1=0 On cgroup-v1: cat /sys/fs/cgroup/hugetlb/test/hugetlb.2MB.numa_stat total=2097152 N0=2097152 N1=0 hierarichal_total=2097152 N0=2097152 N1=0 This patch was tested manually by allocating hugetlb memory and querying the hugetlb.*.numa_stat file of the cgroup and its parents. [colin.i.king@googlemail.com: fix spelling mistake "hierarichal" -> "hierarchical"] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211125090635.23508-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com [keescook@chromium.org: fix copy/paste array assignment] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211203065647.2819707-1-keescook@chromium.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211123001020.4083653-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Jue Wang <juew@google.com> Cc: Yang Yao <ygyao@google.com> Cc: Joanna Li <joannali@google.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-01-14 22:07:48 +00:00
struct hugetlb_cgroup_per_node {
/* hugetlb usage in pages over all hstates. */
unsigned long usage[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE];
};
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 04:11:21 +00:00
struct hugetlb_cgroup {
struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
/*
* the counter to account for hugepages from hugetlb.
*/
struct page_counter hugepage[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE];
/*
* the counter to account for hugepage reservations from hugetlb.
*/
struct page_counter rsvd_hugepage[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE];
atomic_long_t events[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE][HUGETLB_NR_MEMORY_EVENTS];
atomic_long_t events_local[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE][HUGETLB_NR_MEMORY_EVENTS];
/* Handle for "hugetlb.events" */
struct cgroup_file events_file[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE];
/* Handle for "hugetlb.events.local" */
struct cgroup_file events_local_file[HUGE_MAX_HSTATE];
hugetlb: add hugetlb.*.numa_stat file For hugetlb backed jobs/VMs it's critical to understand the numa information for the memory backing these jobs to deliver optimal performance. Currently this technically can be queried from /proc/self/numa_maps, but there are significant issues with that. Namely: 1. Memory can be mapped or unmapped. 2. numa_maps are per process and need to be aggregated across all processes in the cgroup. For shared memory this is more involved as the userspace needs to make sure it doesn't double count shared mappings. 3. I believe querying numa_maps needs to hold the mmap_lock which adds to the contention on this lock. For these reasons I propose simply adding hugetlb.*.numa_stat file, which shows the numa information of the cgroup similarly to memory.numa_stat. On cgroup-v2: cat /sys/fs/cgroup/unified/test/hugetlb.2MB.numa_stat total=2097152 N0=2097152 N1=0 On cgroup-v1: cat /sys/fs/cgroup/hugetlb/test/hugetlb.2MB.numa_stat total=2097152 N0=2097152 N1=0 hierarichal_total=2097152 N0=2097152 N1=0 This patch was tested manually by allocating hugetlb memory and querying the hugetlb.*.numa_stat file of the cgroup and its parents. [colin.i.king@googlemail.com: fix spelling mistake "hierarichal" -> "hierarchical"] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211125090635.23508-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com [keescook@chromium.org: fix copy/paste array assignment] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211203065647.2819707-1-keescook@chromium.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211123001020.4083653-1-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Jue Wang <juew@google.com> Cc: Yang Yao <ygyao@google.com> Cc: Joanna Li <joannali@google.com> Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-01-14 22:07:48 +00:00
struct hugetlb_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[];
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 04:11:21 +00:00
};
static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *
__hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio(struct folio *folio, bool rsvd)
{
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
if (folio_order(folio) < HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
return NULL;
mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page Patch series "mm,huge,rmap: unify and speed up compound mapcounts". This patch (of 3): We want to declare one more int in the first tail of a compound page: that first tail page being valuable property, since every compound page has a first tail, but perhaps no more than that. No problem on 64-bit: there is already space for it. No problem with 32-bit THPs: 5.18 commit 5232c63f46fd ("mm: Make compound_pincount always available") kindly cleared the space for it, apparently not realizing that only 64-bit architectures enable CONFIG_THP_SWAP (whose use of tail page->private might conflict) - but make sure of that in its Kconfig. But hugetlb pages use tail page->private of the first tail page for a subpool pointer, which will conflict; and they also use page->private of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th tails. Undo "mm: add private field of first tail to struct page and struct folio"'s recent addition of private_1 to the folio tail: instead add hugetlb_subpool, hugetlb_cgroup, hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, hugetlb_hwpoison to a second tail page of the folio: THP has long been using several fields of that tail, so make better use of it for hugetlb too. This is not how a generic folio should be declared in future, but it is an effective transitional way to make use of it. Delete the SUBPAGE_INDEX stuff, but keep __NR_USED_SUBPAGE: now 3. [hughd@google.com: prefix folio's page_1 and page_2 with double underscore, give folio's _flags_2 and _head_2 a line documentation each] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9e2cb6b-5b58-d3f2-b5ee-5f8a14e8f10@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5f52de70-975-e94f-f141-543765736181@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3818cc9a-9999-d064-d778-9c94c5911e6@google.com Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-03 01:48:45 +00:00
if (rsvd)
return folio->_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd;
else
return folio->_hugetlb_cgroup;
}
static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio(struct folio *folio)
{
return __hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio(folio, false);
}
static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *
hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio_rsvd(struct folio *folio)
{
return __hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio(folio, true);
}
static inline void __set_hugetlb_cgroup(struct folio *folio,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg, bool rsvd)
{
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
if (folio_order(folio) < HUGETLB_CGROUP_MIN_ORDER)
return;
if (rsvd)
mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page Patch series "mm,huge,rmap: unify and speed up compound mapcounts". This patch (of 3): We want to declare one more int in the first tail of a compound page: that first tail page being valuable property, since every compound page has a first tail, but perhaps no more than that. No problem on 64-bit: there is already space for it. No problem with 32-bit THPs: 5.18 commit 5232c63f46fd ("mm: Make compound_pincount always available") kindly cleared the space for it, apparently not realizing that only 64-bit architectures enable CONFIG_THP_SWAP (whose use of tail page->private might conflict) - but make sure of that in its Kconfig. But hugetlb pages use tail page->private of the first tail page for a subpool pointer, which will conflict; and they also use page->private of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th tails. Undo "mm: add private field of first tail to struct page and struct folio"'s recent addition of private_1 to the folio tail: instead add hugetlb_subpool, hugetlb_cgroup, hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, hugetlb_hwpoison to a second tail page of the folio: THP has long been using several fields of that tail, so make better use of it for hugetlb too. This is not how a generic folio should be declared in future, but it is an effective transitional way to make use of it. Delete the SUBPAGE_INDEX stuff, but keep __NR_USED_SUBPAGE: now 3. [hughd@google.com: prefix folio's page_1 and page_2 with double underscore, give folio's _flags_2 and _head_2 a line documentation each] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9e2cb6b-5b58-d3f2-b5ee-5f8a14e8f10@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5f52de70-975-e94f-f141-543765736181@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3818cc9a-9999-d064-d778-9c94c5911e6@google.com Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-03 01:48:45 +00:00
folio->_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd = h_cg;
else
mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page Patch series "mm,huge,rmap: unify and speed up compound mapcounts". This patch (of 3): We want to declare one more int in the first tail of a compound page: that first tail page being valuable property, since every compound page has a first tail, but perhaps no more than that. No problem on 64-bit: there is already space for it. No problem with 32-bit THPs: 5.18 commit 5232c63f46fd ("mm: Make compound_pincount always available") kindly cleared the space for it, apparently not realizing that only 64-bit architectures enable CONFIG_THP_SWAP (whose use of tail page->private might conflict) - but make sure of that in its Kconfig. But hugetlb pages use tail page->private of the first tail page for a subpool pointer, which will conflict; and they also use page->private of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th tails. Undo "mm: add private field of first tail to struct page and struct folio"'s recent addition of private_1 to the folio tail: instead add hugetlb_subpool, hugetlb_cgroup, hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd, hugetlb_hwpoison to a second tail page of the folio: THP has long been using several fields of that tail, so make better use of it for hugetlb too. This is not how a generic folio should be declared in future, but it is an effective transitional way to make use of it. Delete the SUBPAGE_INDEX stuff, but keep __NR_USED_SUBPAGE: now 3. [hughd@google.com: prefix folio's page_1 and page_2 with double underscore, give folio's _flags_2 and _head_2 a line documentation each] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/9e2cb6b-5b58-d3f2-b5ee-5f8a14e8f10@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5f52de70-975-e94f-f141-543765736181@google.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3818cc9a-9999-d064-d778-9c94c5911e6@google.com Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-03 01:48:45 +00:00
folio->_hugetlb_cgroup = h_cg;
}
static inline void set_hugetlb_cgroup(struct folio *folio,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
__set_hugetlb_cgroup(folio, h_cg, false);
}
static inline void set_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd(struct folio *folio,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
__set_hugetlb_cgroup(folio, h_cg, true);
}
static inline bool hugetlb_cgroup_disabled(void)
{
return !cgroup_subsys_enabled(hugetlb_cgrp_subsys);
}
hugetlb_cgroup: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings The current implementation of hugetlb_cgroup for shared mappings could have different behavior. Consider the following two scenarios: 1.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1: 1.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 2. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. 1.2 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 2, to = 3. So css reference count is 3 associated with 2 file_region. 1.3 coalesce_file_region will coalesce these two file_regions into one. So css reference count is 3 associated with 1 file_region now. 2.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1 again: 2.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 3. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. Therefore, we might have one file_region while holding one or more css reference counts. This inconsistency could lead to imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair. If we do css_put one by one (i.g. hole punch case), scenario 2 would put one more css reference. If we do css_put all together (i.g. truncate case), scenario 1 will leak one css reference. The imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair would result in a non-zero reference when we try to destroy the hugetlb cgroup. The hugetlb cgroup directory is removed __but__ associated resource is not freed. This might result in OOM or can not create a new hugetlb cgroup in a busy workload ultimately. In order to fix this, we have to make sure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference. So in coalesce_file_region case, we should release one css reference before coalescence. Also only put css reference when the entire file_region is removed. The last thing to note is that the caller of region_add() will only hold one reference to h_cg->css for the whole contiguous reservation region. But this area might be scattered when there are already some file_regions reside in it. As a result, many file_regions may share only one h_cg->css reference. In order to ensure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference, we should do css_get() for each file_region and release the reference held by caller when they are done. [linmiaohe@huawei.com: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316023002.53921-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301120540.37076-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 075a61d07a8e ("hugetlb_cgroup: add accounting for shared mappings") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (auto build test ERROR) Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-25 04:37:17 +00:00
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_put_rsvd_cgroup(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
css_put(&h_cg->css);
}
hugetlb: fix hugetlb cgroup refcounting during vma split Guillaume Morin reported hitting the following WARNING followed by GPF or NULL pointer deference either in cgroups_destroy or in the kill_css path.: percpu ref (css_release) <= 0 (-1) after switching to atomic WARNING: CPU: 23 PID: 130 at lib/percpu-refcount.c:196 percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x127/0x130 CPU: 23 PID: 130 Comm: ksoftirqd/23 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O 5.10.60 #1 RIP: 0010:percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x127/0x130 Call Trace: rcu_core+0x30f/0x530 rcu_core_si+0xe/0x10 __do_softirq+0x103/0x2a2 run_ksoftirqd+0x2b/0x40 smpboot_thread_fn+0x11a/0x170 kthread+0x10a/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Upon further examination, it was discovered that the css structure was associated with hugetlb reservations. For private hugetlb mappings the vma points to a reserve map that contains a pointer to the css. At mmap time, reservations are set up and a reference to the css is taken. This reference is dropped in the vma close operation; hugetlb_vm_op_close. However, if a vma is split no additional reference to the css is taken yet hugetlb_vm_op_close will be called twice for the split vma resulting in an underflow. Fix by taking another reference in hugetlb_vm_op_open. Note that the reference is only taken for the owner of the reserve map. In the more common fork case, the pointer to the reserve map is cleared for non-owning vmas. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210830215015.155224-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: e9fe92ae0cd2 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reported-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org> Suggested-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org> Tested-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-02 21:58:53 +00:00
static inline void resv_map_dup_hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_info(
struct resv_map *resv_map)
{
if (resv_map->css)
css_get(resv_map->css);
}
static inline void resv_map_put_hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_info(
struct resv_map *resv_map)
{
if (resv_map->css)
css_put(resv_map->css);
}
extern int hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup **ptr);
extern int hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup **ptr);
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg,
struct folio *folio);
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg,
struct folio *folio);
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct folio *folio);
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct folio *folio);
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg);
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg);
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 04:11:21 +00:00
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_counter(struct resv_map *resv,
unsigned long start,
unsigned long end);
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_file_region(struct resv_map *resv,
struct file_region *rg,
hugetlb_cgroup: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings The current implementation of hugetlb_cgroup for shared mappings could have different behavior. Consider the following two scenarios: 1.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1: 1.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 2. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. 1.2 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 2, to = 3. So css reference count is 3 associated with 2 file_region. 1.3 coalesce_file_region will coalesce these two file_regions into one. So css reference count is 3 associated with 1 file_region now. 2.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1 again: 2.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 3. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. Therefore, we might have one file_region while holding one or more css reference counts. This inconsistency could lead to imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair. If we do css_put one by one (i.g. hole punch case), scenario 2 would put one more css reference. If we do css_put all together (i.g. truncate case), scenario 1 will leak one css reference. The imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair would result in a non-zero reference when we try to destroy the hugetlb cgroup. The hugetlb cgroup directory is removed __but__ associated resource is not freed. This might result in OOM or can not create a new hugetlb cgroup in a busy workload ultimately. In order to fix this, we have to make sure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference. So in coalesce_file_region case, we should release one css reference before coalescence. Also only put css reference when the entire file_region is removed. The last thing to note is that the caller of region_add() will only hold one reference to h_cg->css for the whole contiguous reservation region. But this area might be scattered when there are already some file_regions reside in it. As a result, many file_regions may share only one h_cg->css reference. In order to ensure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference, we should do css_get() for each file_region and release the reference held by caller when they are done. [linmiaohe@huawei.com: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316023002.53921-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301120540.37076-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 075a61d07a8e ("hugetlb_cgroup: add accounting for shared mappings") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (auto build test ERROR) Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-25 04:37:17 +00:00
unsigned long nr_pages,
bool region_del);
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(void) __init;
extern void hugetlb_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old_folio,
struct folio *new_folio);
#else
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_file_region(struct resv_map *resv,
struct file_region *rg,
hugetlb_cgroup: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings The current implementation of hugetlb_cgroup for shared mappings could have different behavior. Consider the following two scenarios: 1.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1: 1.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 2. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. 1.2 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 2, to = 3. So css reference count is 3 associated with 2 file_region. 1.3 coalesce_file_region will coalesce these two file_regions into one. So css reference count is 3 associated with 1 file_region now. 2.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1 again: 2.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 3. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. Therefore, we might have one file_region while holding one or more css reference counts. This inconsistency could lead to imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair. If we do css_put one by one (i.g. hole punch case), scenario 2 would put one more css reference. If we do css_put all together (i.g. truncate case), scenario 1 will leak one css reference. The imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair would result in a non-zero reference when we try to destroy the hugetlb cgroup. The hugetlb cgroup directory is removed __but__ associated resource is not freed. This might result in OOM or can not create a new hugetlb cgroup in a busy workload ultimately. In order to fix this, we have to make sure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference. So in coalesce_file_region case, we should release one css reference before coalescence. Also only put css reference when the entire file_region is removed. The last thing to note is that the caller of region_add() will only hold one reference to h_cg->css for the whole contiguous reservation region. But this area might be scattered when there are already some file_regions reside in it. As a result, many file_regions may share only one h_cg->css reference. In order to ensure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference, we should do css_get() for each file_region and release the reference held by caller when they are done. [linmiaohe@huawei.com: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316023002.53921-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301120540.37076-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 075a61d07a8e ("hugetlb_cgroup: add accounting for shared mappings") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (auto build test ERROR) Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-25 04:37:17 +00:00
unsigned long nr_pages,
bool region_del)
{
}
static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio(struct folio *folio)
{
return NULL;
}
static inline struct hugetlb_cgroup *
hugetlb_cgroup_from_folio_rsvd(struct folio *folio)
{
return NULL;
}
static inline void set_hugetlb_cgroup(struct folio *folio,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
}
static inline void set_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd(struct folio *folio,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
}
static inline bool hugetlb_cgroup_disabled(void)
{
return true;
}
hugetlb_cgroup: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings The current implementation of hugetlb_cgroup for shared mappings could have different behavior. Consider the following two scenarios: 1.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1: 1.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 2. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. 1.2 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 2, to = 3. So css reference count is 3 associated with 2 file_region. 1.3 coalesce_file_region will coalesce these two file_regions into one. So css reference count is 3 associated with 1 file_region now. 2.Assume initial css reference count of hugetlb_cgroup is 1 again: 2.1 Call hugetlb_reserve_pages with from = 1, to = 3. So css reference count is 2 associated with 1 file_region. Therefore, we might have one file_region while holding one or more css reference counts. This inconsistency could lead to imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair. If we do css_put one by one (i.g. hole punch case), scenario 2 would put one more css reference. If we do css_put all together (i.g. truncate case), scenario 1 will leak one css reference. The imbalanced css_get() and css_put() pair would result in a non-zero reference when we try to destroy the hugetlb cgroup. The hugetlb cgroup directory is removed __but__ associated resource is not freed. This might result in OOM or can not create a new hugetlb cgroup in a busy workload ultimately. In order to fix this, we have to make sure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference. So in coalesce_file_region case, we should release one css reference before coalescence. Also only put css reference when the entire file_region is removed. The last thing to note is that the caller of region_add() will only hold one reference to h_cg->css for the whole contiguous reservation region. But this area might be scattered when there are already some file_regions reside in it. As a result, many file_regions may share only one h_cg->css reference. In order to ensure that one file_region must hold exactly one css reference, we should do css_get() for each file_region and release the reference held by caller when they are done. [linmiaohe@huawei.com: fix imbalanced css_get and css_put pair for shared mappings] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210316023002.53921-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210301120540.37076-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 075a61d07a8e ("hugetlb_cgroup: add accounting for shared mappings") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (auto build test ERROR) Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-03-25 04:37:17 +00:00
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_put_rsvd_cgroup(struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
}
hugetlb: fix hugetlb cgroup refcounting during vma split Guillaume Morin reported hitting the following WARNING followed by GPF or NULL pointer deference either in cgroups_destroy or in the kill_css path.: percpu ref (css_release) <= 0 (-1) after switching to atomic WARNING: CPU: 23 PID: 130 at lib/percpu-refcount.c:196 percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x127/0x130 CPU: 23 PID: 130 Comm: ksoftirqd/23 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O 5.10.60 #1 RIP: 0010:percpu_ref_switch_to_atomic_rcu+0x127/0x130 Call Trace: rcu_core+0x30f/0x530 rcu_core_si+0xe/0x10 __do_softirq+0x103/0x2a2 run_ksoftirqd+0x2b/0x40 smpboot_thread_fn+0x11a/0x170 kthread+0x10a/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Upon further examination, it was discovered that the css structure was associated with hugetlb reservations. For private hugetlb mappings the vma points to a reserve map that contains a pointer to the css. At mmap time, reservations are set up and a reference to the css is taken. This reference is dropped in the vma close operation; hugetlb_vm_op_close. However, if a vma is split no additional reference to the css is taken yet hugetlb_vm_op_close will be called twice for the split vma resulting in an underflow. Fix by taking another reference in hugetlb_vm_op_open. Note that the reference is only taken for the owner of the reserve map. In the more common fork case, the pointer to the reserve map is cleared for non-owning vmas. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210830215015.155224-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: e9fe92ae0cd2 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reported-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org> Suggested-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org> Tested-by: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@morinfr.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-02 21:58:53 +00:00
static inline void resv_map_dup_hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_info(
struct resv_map *resv_map)
{
}
static inline void resv_map_put_hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_info(
struct resv_map *resv_map)
{
}
static inline int hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup **ptr)
{
return 0;
}
static inline int hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup_rsvd(int idx,
unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup **ptr)
{
return 0;
}
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg,
struct folio *folio)
{
}
static inline void
hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg,
struct folio *folio)
{
}
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct folio *folio)
{
}
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio_rsvd(int idx,
unsigned long nr_pages,
struct folio *folio)
{
}
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup(int idx,
unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
}
static inline void
hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_cgroup_rsvd(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg)
{
}
hugetlb_cgroup: add reservation accounting for private mappings Normally the pointer to the cgroup to uncharge hangs off the struct page, and gets queried when it's time to free the page. With hugetlb_cgroup reservations, this is not possible. Because it's possible for a page to be reserved by one task and actually faulted in by another task. The best place to put the hugetlb_cgroup pointer to uncharge for reservations is in the resv_map. But, because the resv_map has different semantics for private and shared mappings, the code patch to charge/uncharge shared and private mappings is different. This patch implements charging and uncharging for private mappings. For private mappings, the counter to uncharge is in resv_map->reservation_counter. On initializing the resv_map this is set to NULL. On reservation of a region in private mapping, the tasks hugetlb_cgroup is charged and the hugetlb_cgroup is placed is resv_map->reservation_counter. On hugetlb_vm_op_close, we uncharge resv_map->reservation_counter. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: forward declare struct resv_map] Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211213128.73302-3-almasrymina@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-04-02 04:11:21 +00:00
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_counter(struct resv_map *resv,
unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
}
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_file_init(void)
{
}
static inline void hugetlb_cgroup_migrate(struct folio *old_folio,
struct folio *new_folio)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEM_RES_CTLR_HUGETLB */
#endif