linux-stable/fs/xfs/xfs_discard.c

433 lines
12 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* Copyright (C) 2010, 2023 Red Hat, Inc.
* All Rights Reserved.
*/
#include "xfs.h"
#include "xfs_shared.h"
#include "xfs_format.h"
#include "xfs_log_format.h"
#include "xfs_trans_resv.h"
#include "xfs_mount.h"
#include "xfs_btree.h"
#include "xfs_alloc_btree.h"
#include "xfs_alloc.h"
#include "xfs_discard.h"
#include "xfs_error.h"
#include "xfs_extent_busy.h"
#include "xfs_trace.h"
#include "xfs_log.h"
#include "xfs_ag.h"
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
/*
* Notes on an efficient, low latency fstrim algorithm
*
* We need to walk the filesystem free space and issue discards on the free
* space that meet the search criteria (size and location). We cannot issue
* discards on extents that might be in use, or are so recently in use they are
* still marked as busy. To serialise against extent state changes whilst we are
* gathering extents to trim, we must hold the AGF lock to lock out other
* allocations and extent free operations that might change extent state.
*
* However, we cannot just hold the AGF for the entire AG free space walk whilst
* we issue discards on each free space that is found. Storage devices can have
* extremely slow discard implementations (e.g. ceph RBD) and so walking a
* couple of million free extents and issuing synchronous discards on each
* extent can take a *long* time. Whilst we are doing this walk, nothing else
* can access the AGF, and we can stall transactions and hence the log whilst
* modifications wait for the AGF lock to be released. This can lead hung tasks
* kicking the hung task timer and rebooting the system. This is bad.
*
* Hence we need to take a leaf from the bulkstat playbook. It takes the AGI
* lock, gathers a range of inode cluster buffers that are allocated, drops the
* AGI lock and then reads all the inode cluster buffers and processes them. It
* loops doing this, using a cursor to keep track of where it is up to in the AG
* for each iteration to restart the INOBT lookup from.
*
* We can't do this exactly with free space - once we drop the AGF lock, the
* state of the free extent is out of our control and we cannot run a discard
* safely on it in this situation. Unless, of course, we've marked the free
* extent as busy and undergoing a discard operation whilst we held the AGF
* locked.
*
* This is exactly how online discard works - free extents are marked busy when
* they are freed, and once the extent free has been committed to the journal,
* the busy extent record is marked as "undergoing discard" and the discard is
* then issued on the free extent. Once the discard completes, the busy extent
* record is removed and the extent is able to be allocated again.
*
* In the context of fstrim, if we find a free extent we need to discard, we
* don't have to discard it immediately. All we need to do it record that free
* extent as being busy and under discard, and all the allocation routines will
* now avoid trying to allocate it. Hence if we mark the extent as busy under
* the AGF lock, we can safely discard it without holding the AGF lock because
* nothing will attempt to allocate that free space until the discard completes.
*
* This also allows us to issue discards asynchronously like we do with online
* discard, and so for fast devices fstrim will run much faster as we can have
* multiple discard operations in flight at once, as well as pipeline the free
* extent search so that it overlaps in flight discard IO.
*/
struct workqueue_struct *xfs_discard_wq;
static void
xfs_discard_endio_work(
struct work_struct *work)
{
struct xfs_busy_extents *extents =
container_of(work, struct xfs_busy_extents, endio_work);
xfs_extent_busy_clear(extents->mount, &extents->extent_list, false);
kmem_free(extents->owner);
}
/*
* Queue up the actual completion to a thread to avoid IRQ-safe locking for
* pagb_lock.
*/
static void
xfs_discard_endio(
struct bio *bio)
{
struct xfs_busy_extents *extents = bio->bi_private;
INIT_WORK(&extents->endio_work, xfs_discard_endio_work);
queue_work(xfs_discard_wq, &extents->endio_work);
bio_put(bio);
}
/*
* Walk the discard list and issue discards on all the busy extents in the
* list. We plug and chain the bios so that we only need a single completion
* call to clear all the busy extents once the discards are complete.
*/
int
xfs_discard_extents(
struct xfs_mount *mp,
struct xfs_busy_extents *extents)
{
struct xfs_extent_busy *busyp;
struct bio *bio = NULL;
struct blk_plug plug;
int error = 0;
blk_start_plug(&plug);
list_for_each_entry(busyp, &extents->extent_list, list) {
trace_xfs_discard_extent(mp, busyp->agno, busyp->bno,
busyp->length);
error = __blkdev_issue_discard(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev,
XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR(mp, busyp->agno, busyp->bno),
XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, busyp->length),
GFP_NOFS, &bio);
if (error && error != -EOPNOTSUPP) {
xfs_info(mp,
"discard failed for extent [0x%llx,%u], error %d",
(unsigned long long)busyp->bno,
busyp->length,
error);
break;
}
}
if (bio) {
bio->bi_private = extents;
bio->bi_end_io = xfs_discard_endio;
submit_bio(bio);
} else {
xfs_discard_endio_work(&extents->endio_work);
}
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
return error;
}
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
static int
xfs_trim_gather_extents(
struct xfs_perag *pag,
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
xfs_daddr_t start,
xfs_daddr_t end,
xfs_daddr_t minlen,
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
struct xfs_alloc_rec_incore *tcur,
struct xfs_busy_extents *extents,
uint64_t *blocks_trimmed)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = pag->pag_mount;
struct xfs_btree_cur *cur;
struct xfs_buf *agbp;
int error;
int i;
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
int batch = 100;
/*
* Force out the log. This means any transactions that might have freed
* space before we take the AGF buffer lock are now on disk, and the
* volatile disk cache is flushed.
*/
xfs_log_force(mp, XFS_LOG_SYNC);
error = xfs_alloc_read_agf(pag, NULL, 0, &agbp);
if (error)
return error;
cur = xfs_allocbt_init_cursor(mp, NULL, agbp, pag, XFS_BTNUM_CNT);
/*
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
* Look up the extent length requested in the AGF and start with it.
*/
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
if (tcur->ar_startblock == NULLAGBLOCK)
error = xfs_alloc_lookup_ge(cur, 0, tcur->ar_blockcount, &i);
else
error = xfs_alloc_lookup_le(cur, tcur->ar_startblock,
tcur->ar_blockcount, &i);
if (error)
goto out_del_cursor;
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
if (i == 0) {
/* nothing of that length left in the AG, we are done */
tcur->ar_blockcount = 0;
goto out_del_cursor;
}
/*
* Loop until we are done with all extents that are large
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
* enough to be worth discarding or we hit batch limits.
*/
while (i) {
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
xfs_agblock_t fbno;
xfs_extlen_t flen;
xfs_daddr_t dbno;
xfs_extlen_t dlen;
error = xfs_alloc_get_rec(cur, &fbno, &flen, &i);
if (error)
break;
xfs: kill the XFS_WANT_CORRUPT_* macros The XFS_WANT_CORRUPT_* macros conceal subtle side effects such as the creation of local variables and redirections of the code flow. This is pretty ugly, so replace them with explicit XFS_IS_CORRUPT tests that remove both of those ugly points. The change was performed with the following coccinelle script: @@ expression mp, test; identifier label; @@ - XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO(mp, test, label); + if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !test)) { error = -EFSCORRUPTED; goto label; } @@ expression mp, test; @@ - XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN(mp, test); + if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !test)) return -EFSCORRUPTED; @@ expression mp, lval, rval; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(lval == rval)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, lval != rval) @@ expression mp, e1, e2; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 && e2)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !e1 || !e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - !(e1 == e2) + e1 != e2 @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6; @@ - !(e1 == e2 && e3 == e4) || e5 != e6 + e1 != e2 || e3 != e4 || e5 != e6 @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6; @@ - !(e1 == e2 || (e3 <= e4 && e5 <= e6)) + e1 != e2 && (e3 > e4 || e5 > e6) @@ expression mp, e1, e2; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 <= e2)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 > e2) @@ expression mp, e1, e2; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 < e2)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 >= e2) @@ expression mp, e1; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !!e1) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1) @@ expression mp, e1, e2; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 || e2)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !e1 && !e2) @@ expression mp, e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 == e2) && !(e3 == e4)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 != e2 && e3 != e4) @@ expression mp, e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 <= e2) || !(e3 >= e4)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 > e2 || e3 < e4) @@ expression mp, e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 == e2) && !(e3 <= e4)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 != e2 && e3 > e4) Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2019-11-11 20:52:18 +00:00
if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, i != 1)) {
error = -EFSCORRUPTED;
break;
xfs: kill the XFS_WANT_CORRUPT_* macros The XFS_WANT_CORRUPT_* macros conceal subtle side effects such as the creation of local variables and redirections of the code flow. This is pretty ugly, so replace them with explicit XFS_IS_CORRUPT tests that remove both of those ugly points. The change was performed with the following coccinelle script: @@ expression mp, test; identifier label; @@ - XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO(mp, test, label); + if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !test)) { error = -EFSCORRUPTED; goto label; } @@ expression mp, test; @@ - XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_RETURN(mp, test); + if (XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !test)) return -EFSCORRUPTED; @@ expression mp, lval, rval; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(lval == rval)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, lval != rval) @@ expression mp, e1, e2; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 && e2)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !e1 || !e2) @@ expression e1, e2; @@ - !(e1 == e2) + e1 != e2 @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6; @@ - !(e1 == e2 && e3 == e4) || e5 != e6 + e1 != e2 || e3 != e4 || e5 != e6 @@ expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6; @@ - !(e1 == e2 || (e3 <= e4 && e5 <= e6)) + e1 != e2 && (e3 > e4 || e5 > e6) @@ expression mp, e1, e2; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 <= e2)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 > e2) @@ expression mp, e1, e2; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 < e2)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 >= e2) @@ expression mp, e1; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !!e1) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1) @@ expression mp, e1, e2; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 || e2)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !e1 && !e2) @@ expression mp, e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 == e2) && !(e3 == e4)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 != e2 && e3 != e4) @@ expression mp, e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 <= e2) || !(e3 >= e4)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 > e2 || e3 < e4) @@ expression mp, e1, e2, e3, e4; @@ - XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, !(e1 == e2) && !(e3 <= e4)) + XFS_IS_CORRUPT(mp, e1 != e2 && e3 > e4) Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
2019-11-11 20:52:18 +00:00
}
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
if (--batch <= 0) {
/*
* Update the cursor to point at this extent so we
* restart the next batch from this extent.
*/
tcur->ar_startblock = fbno;
tcur->ar_blockcount = flen;
break;
}
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
/*
* use daddr format for all range/len calculations as that is
* the format the range/len variables are supplied in by
* userspace.
*/
dbno = XFS_AGB_TO_DADDR(mp, pag->pag_agno, fbno);
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
dlen = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, flen);
/*
* Too small? Give up.
*/
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
if (dlen < minlen) {
trace_xfs_discard_toosmall(mp, pag->pag_agno, fbno, flen);
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
tcur->ar_blockcount = 0;
break;
}
/*
* If the extent is entirely outside of the range we are
* supposed to discard skip it. Do not bother to trim
* down partially overlapping ranges for now.
*/
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
if (dbno + dlen < start || dbno > end) {
trace_xfs_discard_exclude(mp, pag->pag_agno, fbno, flen);
goto next_extent;
}
/*
* If any blocks in the range are still busy, skip the
* discard and try again the next time.
*/
if (xfs_extent_busy_search(mp, pag, fbno, flen)) {
trace_xfs_discard_busy(mp, pag->pag_agno, fbno, flen);
goto next_extent;
}
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
xfs_extent_busy_insert_discard(pag, fbno, flen,
&extents->extent_list);
*blocks_trimmed += flen;
next_extent:
error = xfs_btree_decrement(cur, 0, &i);
if (error)
break;
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
/*
* If there's no more records in the tree, we are done. Set the
* cursor block count to 0 to indicate to the caller that there
* is no more extents to search.
*/
if (i == 0)
tcur->ar_blockcount = 0;
}
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
/*
* If there was an error, release all the gathered busy extents because
* we aren't going to issue a discard on them any more.
*/
if (error)
xfs_extent_busy_clear(mp, &extents->extent_list, false);
out_del_cursor:
xfs_btree_del_cursor(cur, error);
xfs_buf_relse(agbp);
return error;
}
static bool
xfs_trim_should_stop(void)
{
return fatal_signal_pending(current) || freezing(current);
}
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
/*
* Iterate the free list gathering extents and discarding them. We need a cursor
* for the repeated iteration of gather/discard loop, so use the longest extent
* we found in the last batch as the key to start the next.
*/
static int
xfs_trim_extents(
struct xfs_perag *pag,
xfs_daddr_t start,
xfs_daddr_t end,
xfs_daddr_t minlen,
uint64_t *blocks_trimmed)
{
struct xfs_alloc_rec_incore tcur = {
.ar_blockcount = pag->pagf_longest,
.ar_startblock = NULLAGBLOCK,
};
int error = 0;
do {
struct xfs_busy_extents *extents;
extents = kzalloc(sizeof(*extents), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!extents) {
error = -ENOMEM;
break;
}
extents->mount = pag->pag_mount;
extents->owner = extents;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&extents->extent_list);
error = xfs_trim_gather_extents(pag, start, end, minlen,
&tcur, extents, blocks_trimmed);
if (error) {
kfree(extents);
break;
}
/*
* We hand the extent list to the discard function here so the
* discarded extents can be removed from the busy extent list.
* This allows the discards to run asynchronously with gathering
* the next round of extents to discard.
*
* However, we must ensure that we do not reference the extent
* list after this function call, as it may have been freed by
* the time control returns to us.
*/
error = xfs_discard_extents(pag->pag_mount, extents);
if (error)
break;
if (xfs_trim_should_stop())
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
break;
xfs: reduce AGF hold times during fstrim operations fstrim will hold the AGF lock for as long as it takes to walk and discard all the free space in the AG that meets the userspace trim criteria. For AGs with lots of free space extents (e.g. millions) or the underlying device is really slow at processing discard requests (e.g. Ceph RBD), this means the AGF hold time is often measured in minutes to hours, not a few milliseconds as we normal see with non-discard based operations. This can result in the entire filesystem hanging whilst the long-running fstrim is in progress. We can have transactions get stuck waiting for the AGF lock (data or metadata extent allocation and freeing), and then more transactions get stuck waiting on the locks those transactions hold. We can get to the point where fstrim blocks an extent allocation or free operation long enough that it ends up pinning the tail of the log and the log then runs out of space. At this point, every modification in the filesystem gets blocked. This includes read operations, if atime updates need to be made. To fix this problem, we need to be able to discard free space extents safely without holding the AGF lock. Fortunately, we already do this with online discard via busy extents. We can mark free space extents as "busy being discarded" under the AGF lock and then unlock the AGF, knowing that nobody will be able to allocate that free space extent until we remove it from the busy tree. Modify xfs_trim_extents to use the same asynchronous discard mechanism backed by busy extents as is used with online discard. This results in the AGF only needing to be held for short periods of time and it is never held while we issue discards. Hence if discard submission gets throttled because it is slow and/or there are lots of them, we aren't preventing other operations from being performed on AGF while we wait for discards to complete... Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
2023-10-03 22:24:52 +00:00
} while (tcur.ar_blockcount != 0);
return error;
}
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
/*
* trim a range of the filesystem.
*
* Note: the parameters passed from userspace are byte ranges into the
* filesystem which does not match to the format we use for filesystem block
* addressing. FSB addressing is sparse (AGNO|AGBNO), while the incoming format
* is a linear address range. Hence we need to use DADDR based conversions and
* comparisons for determining the correct offset and regions to trim.
*/
int
xfs_ioc_trim(
struct xfs_mount *mp,
struct fstrim_range __user *urange)
{
struct xfs_perag *pag;
unsigned int granularity =
bdev_discard_granularity(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev);
struct fstrim_range range;
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
xfs_daddr_t start, end, minlen;
xfs_agnumber_t agno;
uint64_t blocks_trimmed = 0;
int error, last_error = 0;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EPERM;
if (!bdev_max_discard_sectors(mp->m_ddev_targp->bt_bdev))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
/*
* We haven't recovered the log, so we cannot use our bnobt-guided
* storage zapping commands.
*/
if (xfs_has_norecovery(mp))
return -EROFS;
if (copy_from_user(&range, urange, sizeof(range)))
return -EFAULT;
range.minlen = max_t(u64, granularity, range.minlen);
minlen = BTOBB(range.minlen);
/*
* Truncating down the len isn't actually quite correct, but using
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
* BBTOB would mean we trivially get overflows for values
* of ULLONG_MAX or slightly lower. And ULLONG_MAX is the default
* used by the fstrim application. In the end it really doesn't
* matter as trimming blocks is an advisory interface.
*/
if (range.start >= XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks) ||
range.minlen > XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, mp->m_ag_max_usable) ||
range.len < mp->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
return -EINVAL;
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
start = BTOBB(range.start);
end = start + BTOBBT(range.len) - 1;
xfs: fix fstrim offset calculations xfs_ioc_fstrim() doesn't treat the incoming offset and length correctly. It treats them as a filesystem block address, rather than a disk address. This is wrong because the range passed in is a linear representation, while the filesystem block address notation is a sparse representation. Hence we cannot convert the range direct to filesystem block units and then use that for calculating the range to trim. While this sounds dangerous, the problem is limited to calculating what AGs need to be trimmed. The code that calcuates the actual ranges to trim gets the right result (i.e. only ever discards free space), even though it uses the wrong ranges to limit what is trimmed. Hence this is not a bug that endangers user data. Fix this by treating the range as a disk address range and use the appropriate functions to convert the range into the desired formats for calculations. Further, fix the first free extent lookup (the longest) to actually find the largest free extent. Currently this lookup uses a <= lookup, which results in finding the extent to the left of the largest because we can never get an exact match on the largest extent. This is due to the fact that while we know it's size, we don't know it's location and so the exact match fails and we move one record to the left to get the next largest extent. Instead, use a >= search so that the lookup returns the largest extent regardless of the fact we don't get an exact match on it. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-03-22 05:15:12 +00:00
if (end > XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks) - 1)
end = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks) - 1;
agno = xfs_daddr_to_agno(mp, start);
for_each_perag_range(mp, agno, xfs_daddr_to_agno(mp, end), pag) {
error = xfs_trim_extents(pag, start, end, minlen,
&blocks_trimmed);
if (error)
last_error = error;
if (xfs_trim_should_stop()) {
xfs_perag_rele(pag);
break;
}
}
if (last_error)
return last_error;
range.len = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, blocks_trimmed);
if (copy_to_user(urange, &range, sizeof(range)))
return -EFAULT;
return 0;
}