License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
By default all files without license information are under the default
license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne.
How this work was done:
Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
the use cases:
- file had no licensing information it it.
- file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
- file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the
base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
- Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
- Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
lines of source
- File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
lines).
All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
identifiers to apply.
- when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
COPYING file license applied.
For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 11139
and resulted in the first patch in this series.
If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|-------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930
and resulted in the second patch in this series.
- if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
it (per prior point). Results summary:
SPDX license identifier # files
---------------------------------------------------|------
GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270
GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17
LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15
GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14
((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5
LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4
LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1
and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
- when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
the concluded license(s).
- when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
- In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
- When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
- If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
in time.
In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The
Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
they are related.
Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
in about 15000 files.
In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
correct identifier.
Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
version early this week with:
- a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
license ids and scores
- reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
- reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
SPDX license was correct
This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This
worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
different types of files to be modified.
These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to
parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg
based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
generate the patches.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 14:07:57 +00:00
|
|
|
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifndef _LINUX_NUMA_H
|
|
|
|
|
#define _LINUX_NUMA_H
|
2023-12-11 18:27:00 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/init.h>
|
2020-02-16 20:01:09 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/types.h>
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-04-11 05:53:53 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT
|
|
|
|
|
#define NODES_SHIFT CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#define NODES_SHIFT 0
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define MAX_NUMNODES (1 << NODES_SHIFT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-12-15 01:58:23 +00:00
|
|
|
#define NUMA_NO_NODE (-1)
|
x86/numa: Introduce numa_fill_memblks()
numa_fill_memblks() fills in the gaps in numa_meminfo memblks
over an physical address range.
The ACPI driver will use numa_fill_memblks() to implement a new Linux
policy that prescribes extending proximity domains in a portion of a
CFMWS window to the entire window.
Dan Williams offered this explanation of the policy:
A CFWMS is an ACPI data structure that indicates *potential* locations
where CXL memory can be placed. It is the playground where the CXL
driver has free reign to establish regions. That space can be populated
by BIOS created regions, or driver created regions, after hotplug or
other reconfiguration.
When BIOS creates a region in a CXL Window it additionally describes
that subset of the Window range in the other typical ACPI tables SRAT,
SLIT, and HMAT. The rationale for BIOS not pre-describing the entire
CXL Window in SRAT, SLIT, and HMAT is that it can not predict the
future. I.e. there is nothing stopping higher or lower performance
devices being placed in the same Window. Compare that to ACPI memory
hotplug that just onlines additional capacity in the proximity domain
with little freedom for dynamic performance differentiation.
That leaves the OS with a choice, should unpopulated window capacity
match the proximity domain of an existing region, or should it allocate
a new one? This patch takes the simple position of minimizing proximity
domain proliferation by reusing any proximity domain intersection for
the entire Window. If the Window has no intersections then allocate a
new proximity domain. Note that SRAT, SLIT and HMAT information can be
enumerated dynamically in a standard way from device provided data.
Think of CXL as the end of ACPI needing to describe memory attributes,
CXL offers a standard discovery model for performance attributes, but
Linux still needs to interoperate with the old regime.
Reported-by: Derick Marks <derick.w.marks@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Tested-by: Derick Marks <derick.w.marks@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ef078a6f056ca974e5af85997013c0fda9e3326d.1689018477.git.alison.schofield%40intel.com
2023-07-10 20:02:58 +00:00
|
|
|
#define NUMA_NO_MEMBLK (-1)
|
2009-12-15 01:58:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-16 20:01:04 +00:00
|
|
|
/* optionally keep NUMA memory info available post init */
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_KEEP_MEMINFO
|
|
|
|
|
#define __initdata_or_meminfo
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
#define __initdata_or_meminfo __initdata
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-16 20:00:48 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
|
2020-11-22 06:17:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <asm/sparsemem.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-16 20:01:09 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Generic implementation available */
|
2023-08-19 14:12:33 +00:00
|
|
|
int numa_nearest_node(int node, unsigned int state);
|
2020-11-22 06:17:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef memory_add_physaddr_to_nid
|
2023-12-11 18:27:00 +00:00
|
|
|
int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start);
|
2020-11-22 06:17:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2023-12-11 18:27:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-22 06:17:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifndef phys_to_target_node
|
2023-12-11 18:27:00 +00:00
|
|
|
int phys_to_target_node(u64 start);
|
2020-11-22 06:17:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2023-12-11 18:27:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
x86/numa: Introduce numa_fill_memblks()
numa_fill_memblks() fills in the gaps in numa_meminfo memblks
over an physical address range.
The ACPI driver will use numa_fill_memblks() to implement a new Linux
policy that prescribes extending proximity domains in a portion of a
CFMWS window to the entire window.
Dan Williams offered this explanation of the policy:
A CFWMS is an ACPI data structure that indicates *potential* locations
where CXL memory can be placed. It is the playground where the CXL
driver has free reign to establish regions. That space can be populated
by BIOS created regions, or driver created regions, after hotplug or
other reconfiguration.
When BIOS creates a region in a CXL Window it additionally describes
that subset of the Window range in the other typical ACPI tables SRAT,
SLIT, and HMAT. The rationale for BIOS not pre-describing the entire
CXL Window in SRAT, SLIT, and HMAT is that it can not predict the
future. I.e. there is nothing stopping higher or lower performance
devices being placed in the same Window. Compare that to ACPI memory
hotplug that just onlines additional capacity in the proximity domain
with little freedom for dynamic performance differentiation.
That leaves the OS with a choice, should unpopulated window capacity
match the proximity domain of an existing region, or should it allocate
a new one? This patch takes the simple position of minimizing proximity
domain proliferation by reusing any proximity domain intersection for
the entire Window. If the Window has no intersections then allocate a
new proximity domain. Note that SRAT, SLIT and HMAT information can be
enumerated dynamically in a standard way from device provided data.
Think of CXL as the end of ACPI needing to describe memory attributes,
CXL offers a standard discovery model for performance attributes, but
Linux still needs to interoperate with the old regime.
Reported-by: Derick Marks <derick.w.marks@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Tested-by: Derick Marks <derick.w.marks@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ef078a6f056ca974e5af85997013c0fda9e3326d.1689018477.git.alison.schofield%40intel.com
2023-07-10 20:02:58 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifndef numa_fill_memblks
|
|
|
|
|
static inline int __init numa_fill_memblks(u64 start, u64 end)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return NUMA_NO_MEMBLK;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
2023-12-11 18:27:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-22 06:17:05 +00:00
|
|
|
#else /* !CONFIG_NUMA */
|
2023-08-19 14:12:33 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline int numa_nearest_node(int node, unsigned int state)
|
2020-02-16 20:00:48 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return NUMA_NO_NODE;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2023-08-19 14:12:33 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-22 06:17:05 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline int memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(u64 start)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
static inline int phys_to_target_node(u64 start)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-02-16 20:00:48 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-08-19 14:12:33 +00:00
|
|
|
#define numa_map_to_online_node(node) numa_nearest_node(node, N_ONLINE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
x86/sgx: Add an attribute for the amount of SGX memory in a NUMA node
== Problem ==
The amount of SGX memory on a system is determined by the BIOS and it
varies wildly between systems. It can be as small as dozens of MB's
and as large as many GB's on servers. Just like how applications need
to know how much regular RAM is available, enclave builders need to
know how much SGX memory an enclave can consume.
== Solution ==
Introduce a new sysfs file:
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/x86/sgx_total_bytes
to enumerate the amount of SGX memory available in each NUMA node.
This serves the same function for SGX as /proc/meminfo or
/sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/meminfo does for normal RAM.
'sgx_total_bytes' is needed today to help drive the SGX selftests.
SGX-specific swap code is exercised by creating overcommitted enclaves
which are larger than the physical SGX memory on the system. They
currently use a CPUID-based approach which can diverge from the actual
amount of SGX memory available. 'sgx_total_bytes' ensures that the
selftests can work efficiently and do not attempt stupid things like
creating a 100,000 MB enclave on a system with 128 MB of SGX memory.
== Implementation Details ==
Introduce CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODE_DEV_GROUP opt-in flag to expose an
arch specific attribute group, and add an attribute for the amount of
SGX memory in bytes to each NUMA node:
== ABI Design Discussion ==
As opposed to the per-node ABI, a single, global ABI was considered.
However, this would prevent enclaves from being able to size
themselves so that they fit on a single NUMA node. Essentially, a
single value would rule out NUMA optimizations for enclaves.
Create a new "x86/" directory inside each "nodeX/" sysfs directory.
'sgx_total_bytes' is expected to be the first of at least a few
sgx-specific files to be placed in the new directory. Just scanning
/proc/meminfo, these are the no-brainers that we have for RAM, but we
need for SGX:
MemTotal: xxxx kB // sgx_total_bytes (implemented here)
MemFree: yyyy kB // sgx_free_bytes
SwapTotal: zzzz kB // sgx_swapped_bytes
So, at *least* three. I think we will eventually end up needing
something more along the lines of a dozen. A new directory (as
opposed to being in the nodeX/ "root") directory avoids cluttering the
root with several "sgx_*" files.
Place the new file in a new "nodeX/x86/" directory because SGX is
highly x86-specific. It is very unlikely that any other architecture
(or even non-Intel x86 vendor) will ever implement SGX. Using "sgx/"
as opposed to "x86/" was also considered. But, there is a real chance
this can get used for other arch-specific purposes.
[ dhansen: rewrite changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211116162116.93081-2-jarkko@kernel.org
2021-11-16 16:21:16 +00:00
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODE_DEV_GROUP
|
|
|
|
|
extern const struct attribute_group arch_node_dev_group;
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
#endif /* _LINUX_NUMA_H */
|