linux-stable/include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h

87 lines
2.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
/*
* Copyright (c) 2016, Amir Vadai <amir@vadai.me>
* Copyright (c) 2016, Mellanox Technologies. All rights reserved.
*/
#ifndef __NET_TC_TUNNEL_KEY_H
#define __NET_TC_TUNNEL_KEY_H
#include <net/act_api.h>
#include <linux/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h>
#include <net/dst_metadata.h>
struct tcf_tunnel_key_params {
struct rcu_head rcu;
int tcft_action;
struct metadata_dst *tcft_enc_metadata;
};
struct tcf_tunnel_key {
struct tc_action common;
struct tcf_tunnel_key_params __rcu *params;
};
#define to_tunnel_key(a) ((struct tcf_tunnel_key *)a)
static inline bool is_tcf_tunnel_set(const struct tc_action *a)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
struct tcf_tunnel_key *t = to_tunnel_key(a);
net: sched: Do not assume RTNL is held in tunnel key action helpers The cited commit removed RTNL from tc_setup_flow_action(), but the function calls two tunnel key action helpers that use rtnl_dereference() to fetch the action's parameters. This leads to "suspicious RCU usage" warnings [1][2]. Change the helpers to use rcu_dereference_protected() while requiring the action's lock to be held. This is safe because the two helpers are only called from tc_setup_flow_action() which acquires the lock. [1] [ 156.950855] ============================= [ 156.955463] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 156.960085] 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 Not tainted [ 156.967116] ----------------------------- [ 156.971728] include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h:31 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! [ 156.981583] [ 156.981583] other info that might help us debug this: [ 156.981583] [ 156.990675] [ 156.990675] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 156.998205] 1 lock held by tc/877: [ 157.002187] #0: ffff8881cbf7bea0 (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+...}, at: tc_setup_flow_action+0xbe/0x4f78 [ 157.012866] [ 157.012866] stack backtrace: [ 157.017886] CPU: 2 PID: 877 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 [ 157.027253] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 157.037389] Call Trace: [ 157.040170] dump_stack+0xfd/0x178 [ 157.044034] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x14a/0x153 [ 157.049157] tc_setup_flow_action+0x89f/0x4f78 [ 157.054227] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x375/0x640 [ 157.064348] fl_change+0x28ec/0x4f6b [ 157.088843] tc_new_tfilter+0x15e2/0x2260 [ 157.176801] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x8d6/0xb60 [ 157.190915] netlink_rcv_skb+0x177/0x460 [ 157.208884] rtnetlink_rcv+0x21/0x30 [ 157.212925] netlink_unicast+0x5d0/0x7f0 [ 157.227728] netlink_sendmsg+0x981/0xe90 [ 157.245416] ____sys_sendmsg+0x76d/0x8f0 [ 157.255348] ___sys_sendmsg+0x10f/0x190 [ 157.320308] __sys_sendmsg+0x115/0x1f0 [ 157.342553] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7d/0xc0 [ 157.346987] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x600 [ 157.351142] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [2] [ 157.432346] ============================= [ 157.436937] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 157.441537] 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 Not tainted [ 157.448559] ----------------------------- [ 157.453204] include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h:43 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! [ 157.463042] [ 157.463042] other info that might help us debug this: [ 157.463042] [ 157.472112] [ 157.472112] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 157.479529] 1 lock held by tc/877: [ 157.483442] #0: ffff8881cbf7bea0 (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+...}, at: tc_setup_flow_action+0xbe/0x4f78 [ 157.494119] [ 157.494119] stack backtrace: [ 157.499114] CPU: 2 PID: 877 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 [ 157.508485] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 157.518628] Call Trace: [ 157.521416] dump_stack+0xfd/0x178 [ 157.525293] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x14a/0x153 [ 157.530425] tc_setup_flow_action+0x993/0x4f78 [ 157.535505] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x375/0x640 [ 157.545650] fl_change+0x28ec/0x4f6b [ 157.570204] tc_new_tfilter+0x15e2/0x2260 [ 157.658199] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x8d6/0xb60 [ 157.672315] netlink_rcv_skb+0x177/0x460 [ 157.690278] rtnetlink_rcv+0x21/0x30 [ 157.694320] netlink_unicast+0x5d0/0x7f0 [ 157.709129] netlink_sendmsg+0x981/0xe90 [ 157.726813] ____sys_sendmsg+0x76d/0x8f0 [ 157.736725] ___sys_sendmsg+0x10f/0x190 [ 157.801721] __sys_sendmsg+0x115/0x1f0 [ 157.823967] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7d/0xc0 [ 157.828403] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x600 [ 157.832558] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Fixes: b15e7a6e8d31 ("net: sched: don't take rtnl lock during flow_action setup") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-03-19 11:33:10 +00:00
struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params;
net: sched: Do not assume RTNL is held in tunnel key action helpers The cited commit removed RTNL from tc_setup_flow_action(), but the function calls two tunnel key action helpers that use rtnl_dereference() to fetch the action's parameters. This leads to "suspicious RCU usage" warnings [1][2]. Change the helpers to use rcu_dereference_protected() while requiring the action's lock to be held. This is safe because the two helpers are only called from tc_setup_flow_action() which acquires the lock. [1] [ 156.950855] ============================= [ 156.955463] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 156.960085] 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 Not tainted [ 156.967116] ----------------------------- [ 156.971728] include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h:31 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! [ 156.981583] [ 156.981583] other info that might help us debug this: [ 156.981583] [ 156.990675] [ 156.990675] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 156.998205] 1 lock held by tc/877: [ 157.002187] #0: ffff8881cbf7bea0 (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+...}, at: tc_setup_flow_action+0xbe/0x4f78 [ 157.012866] [ 157.012866] stack backtrace: [ 157.017886] CPU: 2 PID: 877 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 [ 157.027253] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 157.037389] Call Trace: [ 157.040170] dump_stack+0xfd/0x178 [ 157.044034] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x14a/0x153 [ 157.049157] tc_setup_flow_action+0x89f/0x4f78 [ 157.054227] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x375/0x640 [ 157.064348] fl_change+0x28ec/0x4f6b [ 157.088843] tc_new_tfilter+0x15e2/0x2260 [ 157.176801] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x8d6/0xb60 [ 157.190915] netlink_rcv_skb+0x177/0x460 [ 157.208884] rtnetlink_rcv+0x21/0x30 [ 157.212925] netlink_unicast+0x5d0/0x7f0 [ 157.227728] netlink_sendmsg+0x981/0xe90 [ 157.245416] ____sys_sendmsg+0x76d/0x8f0 [ 157.255348] ___sys_sendmsg+0x10f/0x190 [ 157.320308] __sys_sendmsg+0x115/0x1f0 [ 157.342553] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7d/0xc0 [ 157.346987] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x600 [ 157.351142] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [2] [ 157.432346] ============================= [ 157.436937] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 157.441537] 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 Not tainted [ 157.448559] ----------------------------- [ 157.453204] include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h:43 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! [ 157.463042] [ 157.463042] other info that might help us debug this: [ 157.463042] [ 157.472112] [ 157.472112] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 157.479529] 1 lock held by tc/877: [ 157.483442] #0: ffff8881cbf7bea0 (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+...}, at: tc_setup_flow_action+0xbe/0x4f78 [ 157.494119] [ 157.494119] stack backtrace: [ 157.499114] CPU: 2 PID: 877 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 [ 157.508485] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 157.518628] Call Trace: [ 157.521416] dump_stack+0xfd/0x178 [ 157.525293] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x14a/0x153 [ 157.530425] tc_setup_flow_action+0x993/0x4f78 [ 157.535505] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x375/0x640 [ 157.545650] fl_change+0x28ec/0x4f6b [ 157.570204] tc_new_tfilter+0x15e2/0x2260 [ 157.658199] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x8d6/0xb60 [ 157.672315] netlink_rcv_skb+0x177/0x460 [ 157.690278] rtnetlink_rcv+0x21/0x30 [ 157.694320] netlink_unicast+0x5d0/0x7f0 [ 157.709129] netlink_sendmsg+0x981/0xe90 [ 157.726813] ____sys_sendmsg+0x76d/0x8f0 [ 157.736725] ___sys_sendmsg+0x10f/0x190 [ 157.801721] __sys_sendmsg+0x115/0x1f0 [ 157.823967] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7d/0xc0 [ 157.828403] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x600 [ 157.832558] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Fixes: b15e7a6e8d31 ("net: sched: don't take rtnl lock during flow_action setup") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-03-19 11:33:10 +00:00
params = rcu_dereference_protected(t->params,
lockdep_is_held(&a->tcfa_lock));
if (a->ops && a->ops->id == TCA_ID_TUNNEL_KEY)
return params->tcft_action == TCA_TUNNEL_KEY_ACT_SET;
#endif
return false;
}
static inline bool is_tcf_tunnel_release(const struct tc_action *a)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
struct tcf_tunnel_key *t = to_tunnel_key(a);
net: sched: Do not assume RTNL is held in tunnel key action helpers The cited commit removed RTNL from tc_setup_flow_action(), but the function calls two tunnel key action helpers that use rtnl_dereference() to fetch the action's parameters. This leads to "suspicious RCU usage" warnings [1][2]. Change the helpers to use rcu_dereference_protected() while requiring the action's lock to be held. This is safe because the two helpers are only called from tc_setup_flow_action() which acquires the lock. [1] [ 156.950855] ============================= [ 156.955463] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 156.960085] 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 Not tainted [ 156.967116] ----------------------------- [ 156.971728] include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h:31 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! [ 156.981583] [ 156.981583] other info that might help us debug this: [ 156.981583] [ 156.990675] [ 156.990675] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 156.998205] 1 lock held by tc/877: [ 157.002187] #0: ffff8881cbf7bea0 (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+...}, at: tc_setup_flow_action+0xbe/0x4f78 [ 157.012866] [ 157.012866] stack backtrace: [ 157.017886] CPU: 2 PID: 877 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 [ 157.027253] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 157.037389] Call Trace: [ 157.040170] dump_stack+0xfd/0x178 [ 157.044034] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x14a/0x153 [ 157.049157] tc_setup_flow_action+0x89f/0x4f78 [ 157.054227] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x375/0x640 [ 157.064348] fl_change+0x28ec/0x4f6b [ 157.088843] tc_new_tfilter+0x15e2/0x2260 [ 157.176801] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x8d6/0xb60 [ 157.190915] netlink_rcv_skb+0x177/0x460 [ 157.208884] rtnetlink_rcv+0x21/0x30 [ 157.212925] netlink_unicast+0x5d0/0x7f0 [ 157.227728] netlink_sendmsg+0x981/0xe90 [ 157.245416] ____sys_sendmsg+0x76d/0x8f0 [ 157.255348] ___sys_sendmsg+0x10f/0x190 [ 157.320308] __sys_sendmsg+0x115/0x1f0 [ 157.342553] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7d/0xc0 [ 157.346987] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x600 [ 157.351142] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [2] [ 157.432346] ============================= [ 157.436937] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 157.441537] 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 Not tainted [ 157.448559] ----------------------------- [ 157.453204] include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h:43 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! [ 157.463042] [ 157.463042] other info that might help us debug this: [ 157.463042] [ 157.472112] [ 157.472112] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 157.479529] 1 lock held by tc/877: [ 157.483442] #0: ffff8881cbf7bea0 (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+...}, at: tc_setup_flow_action+0xbe/0x4f78 [ 157.494119] [ 157.494119] stack backtrace: [ 157.499114] CPU: 2 PID: 877 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 [ 157.508485] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 157.518628] Call Trace: [ 157.521416] dump_stack+0xfd/0x178 [ 157.525293] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x14a/0x153 [ 157.530425] tc_setup_flow_action+0x993/0x4f78 [ 157.535505] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x375/0x640 [ 157.545650] fl_change+0x28ec/0x4f6b [ 157.570204] tc_new_tfilter+0x15e2/0x2260 [ 157.658199] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x8d6/0xb60 [ 157.672315] netlink_rcv_skb+0x177/0x460 [ 157.690278] rtnetlink_rcv+0x21/0x30 [ 157.694320] netlink_unicast+0x5d0/0x7f0 [ 157.709129] netlink_sendmsg+0x981/0xe90 [ 157.726813] ____sys_sendmsg+0x76d/0x8f0 [ 157.736725] ___sys_sendmsg+0x10f/0x190 [ 157.801721] __sys_sendmsg+0x115/0x1f0 [ 157.823967] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7d/0xc0 [ 157.828403] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x600 [ 157.832558] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Fixes: b15e7a6e8d31 ("net: sched: don't take rtnl lock during flow_action setup") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-03-19 11:33:10 +00:00
struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params;
net: sched: Do not assume RTNL is held in tunnel key action helpers The cited commit removed RTNL from tc_setup_flow_action(), but the function calls two tunnel key action helpers that use rtnl_dereference() to fetch the action's parameters. This leads to "suspicious RCU usage" warnings [1][2]. Change the helpers to use rcu_dereference_protected() while requiring the action's lock to be held. This is safe because the two helpers are only called from tc_setup_flow_action() which acquires the lock. [1] [ 156.950855] ============================= [ 156.955463] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 156.960085] 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 Not tainted [ 156.967116] ----------------------------- [ 156.971728] include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h:31 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! [ 156.981583] [ 156.981583] other info that might help us debug this: [ 156.981583] [ 156.990675] [ 156.990675] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 156.998205] 1 lock held by tc/877: [ 157.002187] #0: ffff8881cbf7bea0 (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+...}, at: tc_setup_flow_action+0xbe/0x4f78 [ 157.012866] [ 157.012866] stack backtrace: [ 157.017886] CPU: 2 PID: 877 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 [ 157.027253] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 157.037389] Call Trace: [ 157.040170] dump_stack+0xfd/0x178 [ 157.044034] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x14a/0x153 [ 157.049157] tc_setup_flow_action+0x89f/0x4f78 [ 157.054227] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x375/0x640 [ 157.064348] fl_change+0x28ec/0x4f6b [ 157.088843] tc_new_tfilter+0x15e2/0x2260 [ 157.176801] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x8d6/0xb60 [ 157.190915] netlink_rcv_skb+0x177/0x460 [ 157.208884] rtnetlink_rcv+0x21/0x30 [ 157.212925] netlink_unicast+0x5d0/0x7f0 [ 157.227728] netlink_sendmsg+0x981/0xe90 [ 157.245416] ____sys_sendmsg+0x76d/0x8f0 [ 157.255348] ___sys_sendmsg+0x10f/0x190 [ 157.320308] __sys_sendmsg+0x115/0x1f0 [ 157.342553] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7d/0xc0 [ 157.346987] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x600 [ 157.351142] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [2] [ 157.432346] ============================= [ 157.436937] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 157.441537] 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 Not tainted [ 157.448559] ----------------------------- [ 157.453204] include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h:43 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! [ 157.463042] [ 157.463042] other info that might help us debug this: [ 157.463042] [ 157.472112] [ 157.472112] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 157.479529] 1 lock held by tc/877: [ 157.483442] #0: ffff8881cbf7bea0 (&(&p->tcfa_lock)->rlock){+...}, at: tc_setup_flow_action+0xbe/0x4f78 [ 157.494119] [ 157.494119] stack backtrace: [ 157.499114] CPU: 2 PID: 877 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.6.0-rc5-custom-47426-gdfe43878d573 #2409 [ 157.508485] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN2100-CB2FO/SA001017, BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016 [ 157.518628] Call Trace: [ 157.521416] dump_stack+0xfd/0x178 [ 157.525293] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x14a/0x153 [ 157.530425] tc_setup_flow_action+0x993/0x4f78 [ 157.535505] fl_hw_replace_filter+0x375/0x640 [ 157.545650] fl_change+0x28ec/0x4f6b [ 157.570204] tc_new_tfilter+0x15e2/0x2260 [ 157.658199] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x8d6/0xb60 [ 157.672315] netlink_rcv_skb+0x177/0x460 [ 157.690278] rtnetlink_rcv+0x21/0x30 [ 157.694320] netlink_unicast+0x5d0/0x7f0 [ 157.709129] netlink_sendmsg+0x981/0xe90 [ 157.726813] ____sys_sendmsg+0x76d/0x8f0 [ 157.736725] ___sys_sendmsg+0x10f/0x190 [ 157.801721] __sys_sendmsg+0x115/0x1f0 [ 157.823967] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0x7d/0xc0 [ 157.828403] do_syscall_64+0xc1/0x600 [ 157.832558] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Fixes: b15e7a6e8d31 ("net: sched: don't take rtnl lock during flow_action setup") Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2020-03-19 11:33:10 +00:00
params = rcu_dereference_protected(t->params,
lockdep_is_held(&a->tcfa_lock));
if (a->ops && a->ops->id == TCA_ID_TUNNEL_KEY)
return params->tcft_action == TCA_TUNNEL_KEY_ACT_RELEASE;
#endif
return false;
}
static inline struct ip_tunnel_info *tcf_tunnel_info(const struct tc_action *a)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
struct tcf_tunnel_key *t = to_tunnel_key(a);
net: sched: Fix suspicious RCU usage while accessing tcf_tunnel_info The access of tcf_tunnel_info() produces the following splat, so fix it by dereferencing the tcf_tunnel_key_params pointer with marker that internal tcfa_liock is held. ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.9.0+ #1 Not tainted ----------------------------- include/net/tc_act/tc_tunnel_key.h:59 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by tc/34839: #0: ffff88828572c2a0 (&p->tcfa_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: tc_setup_flow_action+0xb3/0x48b5 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 34839 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.9.0+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x9a/0xd0 tc_setup_flow_action+0x14cb/0x48b5 fl_hw_replace_filter+0x347/0x690 [cls_flower] fl_change+0x2bad/0x4875 [cls_flower] tc_new_tfilter+0xf6f/0x1ba0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x5f2/0x870 netlink_rcv_skb+0x124/0x350 netlink_unicast+0x433/0x700 netlink_sendmsg+0x6f1/0xbd0 sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xe0 ____sys_sendmsg+0x4fa/0x6d0 ___sys_sendmsg+0x12e/0x1b0 __sys_sendmsg+0xa4/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f1f8cd4fe57 Code: 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 74 24 10 RSP: 002b:00007ffdc1e193b8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1f8cd4fe57 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffdc1e19420 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 000000005f85aafa R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffdc1e1936c R10: 000000000040522d R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffdc1e1d6f0 R15: 0000000000482420 Fixes: 3ebaf6da0716 ("net: sched: Do not assume RTNL is held in tunnel key action helpers") Fixes: 7a47281439ba ("net: sched: lock action when translating it to flow_action infra") Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2020-10-14 08:56:42 +00:00
struct tcf_tunnel_key_params *params;
params = rcu_dereference_protected(t->params,
lockdep_is_held(&a->tcfa_lock));
return &params->tcft_enc_metadata->u.tun_info;
#else
return NULL;
#endif
}
static inline struct ip_tunnel_info *
tcf_tunnel_info_copy(const struct tc_action *a)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
struct ip_tunnel_info *tun = tcf_tunnel_info(a);
if (tun) {
size_t tun_size = sizeof(*tun) + tun->options_len;
struct ip_tunnel_info *tun_copy = kmemdup(tun, tun_size,
GFP_ATOMIC);
return tun_copy;
}
#endif
return NULL;
}
#endif /* __NET_TC_TUNNEL_KEY_H */