mirrors/linux-stable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git synced 2024-09-22 10:31:08 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

um: time-travel: fix signal blocking race/hang

Browse source 
[ Upstream commit 2cf3a3c4b8 ]

When signals are hard-blocked in order to do time-travel
socket processing, we set signals_blocked and then handle
SIGIO signals by setting the SIGIO bit in signals_pending.
When unblocking, we first set signals_blocked to 0, and
then handle all pending signals. We have to set it first,
so that we can again properly block/unblock inside the
unblock, if the time-travel handlers need to be processed.

Unfortunately, this is racy. We can get into this situation:

// signals_pending = SIGIO_MASK

unblock_signals_hard()
   signals_blocked = 0;
   if (signals_pending && signals_enabled) {
     block_signals();
     unblock_signals()
       ...
       sig_handler_common(SIGIO, NULL, NULL);
         sigio_handler()
           ...
           sigio_reg_handler()
             irq_do_timetravel_handler()
               reg->timetravel_handler() ==
               vu_req_interrupt_comm_handler()
                 vu_req_read_message()
                   vhost_user_recv_req()
                     vhost_user_recv()
                       vhost_user_recv_header()
                         // reads 12 bytes header of
                         // 20 bytes message
<-- receive SIGIO here <--
sig_handler()
   int enabled = signals_enabled; // 1
   if ((signals_blocked || !enabled) && (sig == SIGIO)) {
     if (!signals_blocked && time_travel_mode == TT_MODE_EXTERNAL)
       sigio_run_timetravel_handlers()
         _sigio_handler()
           sigio_reg_handler()
             ... as above ...
               vhost_user_recv_header()
                 // reads 8 bytes that were message payload
                 // as if it were header - but aborts since
                 // it then gets -EAGAIN
...
--> end signal handler -->
                       // continue in vhost_user_recv()
                       // full_read() for 8 bytes payload busy loops
                       // entire process hangs here

Conceptually, to fix this, we need to ensure that the
signal handler cannot run while we hard-unblock signals.
The thing that makes this more complex is that we can be
doing hard-block/unblock while unblocking. Introduce a
new signals_blocked_pending variable that we can keep at
non-zero as long as pending signals are being processed,
then we only need to ensure it's decremented safely and
the signal handler will only increment it if it's already
non-zero (or signals_blocked is set, of course.)

Note also that only the outermost call to hard-unblock is
allowed to decrement signals_blocked_pending, since it
could otherwise reach zero in an inner call, and leave
the same race happening if the timetravel_handler loops,
but that's basically required of it.

Fixes: d6b399a0e0 ("um: time-travel/signals: fix ndelay() in interrupt")
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240703110144.28034-2-johannes@sipsolutions.net
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Johannes Berg 2024-07-03 13:01:45 +02:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent f66d436204
commit 0aa0284818
1 changed files with 98 additions and 20 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

118
arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c
View file

@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdarg.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <string.h>
@ -65,9 +66,7 @@ static void sig_handler_common(int sig, struct siginfo *si, mcontext_t *mc)
int signals_enabled;
#ifdef UML_CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
static int signals_blocked;
#else
#define signals_blocked 0
static int signals_blocked, signals_blocked_pending;
#endif
static unsigned int signals_pending;
static unsigned int signals_active = 0;
@ -76,14 +75,27 @@ void sig_handler(int sig, struct siginfo *si, mcontext_t *mc)
{
int enabled = signals_enabled;
if ((signals_blocked || !enabled) && (sig == SIGIO)) {
#ifdef UML_CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
if ((signals_blocked ||
__atomic_load_n(&signals_blocked_pending, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)) &&
(sig == SIGIO)) {
/* increment so unblock will do another round */
__atomic_add_fetch(&signals_blocked_pending, 1,
__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
return;
}
#endif
if (!enabled && (sig == SIGIO)) {
/*
* In TT_MODE_EXTERNAL, need to still call time-travel
* handlers unless signals are also blocked for the
* external time message processing. This will mark
* signals_pending by itself (only if necessary.)
* handlers. This will mark signals_pending by itself
* (only if necessary.)
* Note we won't get here if signals are hard-blocked
* (which is handled above), in that case the hard-
* unblock will handle things.
*/
if (!signals_blocked && time_travel_mode == TT_MODE_EXTERNAL)
if (time_travel_mode == TT_MODE_EXTERNAL)
sigio_run_timetravel_handlers();
else
signals_pending |= SIGIO_MASK;
@ -380,33 +392,99 @@ int um_set_signals_trace(int enable)
#ifdef UML_CONFIG_UML_TIME_TRAVEL_SUPPORT
void mark_sigio_pending(void)
{
/*
* It would seem that this should be atomic so
* it isn't a read-modify-write with a signal
* that could happen in the middle, losing the
* value set by the signal.
*
* However, this function is only called when in
* time-travel=ext simulation mode, in which case
* the only signal ever pending is SIGIO, which
* is blocked while this can be called, and the
* timer signal (SIGALRM) cannot happen.
*/
signals_pending |= SIGIO_MASK;
}
void block_signals_hard(void)
{
if (signals_blocked)
return;
signals_blocked = 1;
signals_blocked++;
barrier();
}
void unblock_signals_hard(void)
{
static bool unblocking;
if (!signals_blocked)
panic("unblocking signals while not blocked");
if (--signals_blocked)
return;
/* Must be set to 0 before we check the pending bits etc. */
signals_blocked = 0;
/*
* Must be set to 0 before we check pending so the
* SIGIO handler will run as normal unless we're still
* going to process signals_blocked_pending.
*/
barrier();
if (signals_pending && signals_enabled) {
/* this is a bit inefficient, but that's not really important */
block_signals();
unblock_signals();
} else if (signals_pending & SIGIO_MASK) {
/* we need to run time-travel handlers even if not enabled */
sigio_run_timetravel_handlers();
/*
* Note that block_signals_hard()/unblock_signals_hard() can be called
* within the unblock_signals()/sigio_run_timetravel_handlers() below.
* This would still be prone to race conditions since it's actually a
* call _within_ e.g. vu_req_read_message(), where we observed this
* issue, which loops. Thus, if the inner call handles the recorded
* pending signals, we can get out of the inner call with the real
* signal hander no longer blocked, and still have a race. Thus don't
* handle unblocking in the inner call, if it happens, but only in
* the outermost call - 'unblocking' serves as an ownership for the
* signals_blocked_pending decrement.
*/
if (unblocking)
return;
unblocking = true;
while (__atomic_load_n(&signals_blocked_pending, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST)) {
if (signals_enabled) {
/* signals are enabled so we can touch this */
signals_pending |= SIGIO_MASK;
/*
* this is a bit inefficient, but that's
* not really important
*/
block_signals();
unblock_signals();
} else {
/*
* we need to run time-travel handlers even
* if not enabled
*/
sigio_run_timetravel_handlers();
}
/*
* The decrement of signals_blocked_pending must be atomic so
* that the signal handler will either happen before or after
* the decrement, not during a read-modify-write:
* - If it happens before, it can increment it and we'll
* decrement it and do another round in the loop.
* - If it happens after it'll see 0 for both signals_blocked
* and signals_blocked_pending and thus run the handler as
* usual (subject to signals_enabled, but that's unrelated.)
*
* Note that a call to unblock_signals_hard() within the calls
* to unblock_signals() or sigio_run_timetravel_handlers() above
* will do nothing due to the 'unblocking' state, so this cannot
* underflow as the only one decrementing will be the outermost
* one.
*/
if (__atomic_sub_fetch(&signals_blocked_pending, 1,
__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST) < 0)
panic("signals_blocked_pending underflow");
}
unblocking = false;
}
#endif