From 0b50478fd8774f42721f4297293b711e17bc4b7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tiezhu Yang Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 17:03:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Skip callback tests if jit is disabled in test_verifier If CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set and bpf_jit_enable is 0, there exist 6 failed tests. [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL #106/p inline simple bpf_loop call FAIL #107/p don't inline bpf_loop call, flags non-zero FAIL #108/p don't inline bpf_loop call, callback non-constant FAIL #109/p bpf_loop_inline and a dead func FAIL #110/p bpf_loop_inline stack locations for loop vars FAIL #111/p inline bpf_loop call in a big program FAIL Summary: 768 PASSED, 15 SKIPPED, 6 FAILED The test log shows that callbacks are not allowed in non-JITed programs, interpreter doesn't support them yet, thus these tests should be skipped if jit is disabled. Add an explicit flag F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED to those tests to mark that they require JIT enabled in bpf_loop_inline.c, check the flag and jit_disabled at the beginning of do_test_single() to handle this case. With this patch: [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL Summary: 768 PASSED, 21 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240123090351.2207-3-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 11 +++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 1a09fc34d093..e1a1dfe8d7fa 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ #define F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS (1 << 0) #define F_LOAD_WITH_STRICT_ALIGNMENT (1 << 1) +#define F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED (1 << 2) /* need CAP_BPF, CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_PERFMON to load progs */ #define ADMIN_CAPS (1ULL << CAP_NET_ADMIN | \ @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ 1ULL << CAP_BPF) #define UNPRIV_SYSCTL "kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled" static bool unpriv_disabled = false; +static bool jit_disabled; static int skips; static bool verbose = false; static int verif_log_level = 0; @@ -1524,6 +1526,13 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv, __u32 pflags; int i, err; + if ((test->flags & F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED) && jit_disabled) { + printf("SKIP (requires BPF JIT)"); + skips++; + sched_yield(); + return; + } + fd_prog = -1; for (i = 0; i < MAX_NR_MAPS; i++) map_fds[i] = -1; @@ -1844,6 +1853,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) return EXIT_FAILURE; } + jit_disabled = !is_jit_enabled(); + /* Use libbpf 1.0 API mode */ libbpf_set_strict_mode(LIBBPF_STRICT_ALL); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c index a535d41dc20d..59125b22ae39 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bpf_loop_inline.c @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ .expected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() }, .unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED, .result = ACCEPT, .runs = 0, .func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 12, CALLBACK_TYPE } }, @@ -90,6 +91,7 @@ .expected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() }, .unexpected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED, .result = ACCEPT, .runs = 0, .func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 16, CALLBACK_TYPE } }, @@ -127,6 +129,7 @@ .expected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() }, .unexpected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED, .result = ACCEPT, .runs = 0, .func_info = { @@ -165,6 +168,7 @@ .expected_insns = { PSEUDO_CALL_INSN() }, .unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED, .result = ACCEPT, .runs = 0, .func_info = { @@ -235,6 +239,7 @@ }, .unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED, .result = ACCEPT, .func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, @@ -252,6 +257,7 @@ .unexpected_insns = { HELPER_CALL_INSN() }, .result = ACCEPT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, + .flags = F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED, .func_info = { { 0, MAIN_TYPE }, { 16, CALLBACK_TYPE } }, .func_info_cnt = 2, BTF_TYPES