drm/i915: Don't skip request retirement if the active list is empty

Apparently we can have requests even if though the active list is empty,
so do the request retirement regardless of whether there's anything
on the active list.

The way it happened here is that during suspend intel_ring_idle()
notices the olr hanging around and then proceeds to get rid of it by
adding a request. However since there was nothing on the active lists
i915_gem_retire_requests() didn't clean those up, and so the idle work
never runs, and we leave the GPU "busy" during suspend resulting in a
WARN later.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ville Syrjälä 2015-05-28 18:32:36 +03:00 committed by Jani Nikula
parent bf546f8158
commit 11ee9615f9
1 changed files with 0 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -2813,9 +2813,6 @@ i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
{
WARN_ON(i915_verify_lists(ring->dev));
if (list_empty(&ring->active_list))
return;
/* Retire requests first as we use it above for the early return.
* If we retire requests last, we may use a later seqno and so clear
* the requests lists without clearing the active list, leading to