mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-09-03 17:40:04 +00:00
sched: Fix hotplug vs CPU bandwidth control
Since we now migrate tasks away before DYING, we should also move bandwidth unthrottle, otherwise we can gain tasks from unthrottle after we expect all tasks to be gone already. Also; it looks like the RT balancers don't respect cpu_active() and instead rely on rq->online in part, complete this. This too requires we do set_rq_offline() earlier to match the cpu_active() semantics. (The bigger patch is to convert RT to cpu_active() entirely) Since set_rq_online() is called from sched_cpu_activate(), place set_rq_offline() in sched_cpu_deactivate(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201023102346.639538965@infradead.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
1cf12e08bc
commit
120455c514
3 changed files with 12 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -6977,6 +6977,8 @@ int sched_cpu_activate(unsigned int cpu)
|
|||
|
||||
int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
|
||||
struct rq_flags rf;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
set_cpu_active(cpu, false);
|
||||
|
@ -6991,6 +6993,14 @@ int sched_cpu_deactivate(unsigned int cpu)
|
|||
|
||||
balance_push_set(cpu, true);
|
||||
|
||||
rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
|
||||
if (rq->rd) {
|
||||
update_rq_clock(rq);
|
||||
BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
|
||||
set_rq_offline(rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When going down, decrement the number of cores with SMT present.
|
||||
|
@ -7072,10 +7082,6 @@ int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
|
|||
sched_tick_stop(cpu);
|
||||
|
||||
rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
|
||||
if (rq->rd) {
|
||||
BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
|
||||
set_rq_offline(rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
BUG_ON(rq->nr_running != 1);
|
||||
rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq);
|
|||
|
||||
static inline bool need_pull_dl_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return dl_task(prev);
|
||||
return rq->online && dl_task(prev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct callback_head, dl_push_head);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq);
|
|||
static inline bool need_pull_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Try to pull RT tasks here if we lower this rq's prio */
|
||||
return rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > prev->prio;
|
||||
return rq->online && rq->rt.highest_prio.curr > prev->prio;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int rt_overloaded(struct rq *rq)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue