net: add annotation for sock_{lock,unlock}_fast

The static checker is fooled by the non-static locking scheme
implemented by the mentioned helpers.
Let's make its life easier adding some unconditional annotation
so that the helpers are now interpreted as a plain spinlock from
sparse.

v1 -> v2:
 - add __releases() annotation to unlock_sock_fast()

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6ed7ae627d8271fb7f20e0a9c6750fbba1ac2635.1605634911.git.pabeni@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Paolo Abeni 2020-11-17 19:43:49 +01:00 committed by Jakub Kicinski
parent c3bc2adb05
commit 12f4bd8622
2 changed files with 9 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -1595,7 +1595,8 @@ void release_sock(struct sock *sk);
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING)
#define bh_unlock_sock(__sk) spin_unlock(&((__sk)->sk_lock.slock))
bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk);
bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
/**
* unlock_sock_fast - complement of lock_sock_fast
* @sk: socket
@ -1605,11 +1606,14 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk);
* If slow mode is on, we call regular release_sock()
*/
static inline void unlock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk, bool slow)
__releases(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
{
if (slow)
if (slow) {
release_sock(sk);
else
__release(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
} else {
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
}
}
/* Used by processes to "lock" a socket state, so that

View File

@ -3078,7 +3078,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_sock);
*
* sk_lock.slock unlocked, owned = 1, BH enabled
*/
bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk) __acquires(&sk->sk_lock.slock)
{
might_sleep();
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
@ -3096,6 +3096,7 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here:
*/
mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
__acquire(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
local_bh_enable();
return true;
}