mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-10-30 08:02:30 +00:00
rcu: Remove rsp parameter from note_gp_changes()
There now is only one rcu_state structure in a given build of the Linux kernel, so there is no need to pass it as a parameter to RCU's functions. This commit therefore removes the rsp parameter from note_gp_changes(). Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7e48f7ba3
commit
15cabdffbb
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
@ -1801,7 +1801,7 @@ static bool __note_gp_changes(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void note_gp_changes(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
||||
static void note_gp_changes(struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
bool needwake;
|
||||
|
@ -2375,7 +2375,7 @@ static void
|
|||
rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Check for grace-period ends and beginnings. */
|
||||
note_gp_changes(rsp, rdp);
|
||||
note_gp_changes(rdp);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Does this CPU still need to do its part for current grace period?
|
||||
|
@ -2840,7 +2840,7 @@ static void __call_rcu_core(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
|
|||
rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check + qhimark)) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Are we ignoring a completed grace period? */
|
||||
note_gp_changes(rsp, rdp);
|
||||
note_gp_changes(rdp);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Start a new grace period if one not already started. */
|
||||
if (!rcu_gp_in_progress()) {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1586,7 +1586,7 @@ static bool __maybe_unused rcu_try_advance_all_cbs(void)
|
|||
rcu_seq_current(&rnp->gp_seq)) ||
|
||||
unlikely(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap))) &&
|
||||
rcu_segcblist_pend_cbs(&rdp->cblist))
|
||||
note_gp_changes(rsp, rdp);
|
||||
note_gp_changes(rdp);
|
||||
|
||||
if (rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist))
|
||||
cbs_ready = true;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue