From 17e18ab6ff6ec44e95514c7346d2cbd0363ef640 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julia Lawall Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:08:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fuse: add missing fuse_request_free The error handling code for the second call to fuse_request_alloc should include freeing the result of the first one. This bug was found by the Coccinelle project: http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/ Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi --- fs/fuse/inode.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c index 6a84388cacff..54b1f0e1ef58 100644 --- a/fs/fuse/inode.c +++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c @@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static int fuse_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) if (is_bdev) { fc->destroy_req = fuse_request_alloc(); if (!fc->destroy_req) - goto err_put_root; + goto err_free_init_req; } mutex_lock(&fuse_mutex); @@ -895,6 +895,7 @@ static int fuse_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) err_unlock: mutex_unlock(&fuse_mutex); + err_free_init_req: fuse_request_free(init_req); err_put_root: dput(root_dentry);