cxgb4: fix regression with HASH tc prio value update

[ Upstream commit a27fb314cb ]

commit db43b30cd8 ("cxgb4: add ethtool n-tuple filter deletion")
has moved searching for next highest priority HASH filter rule to
cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy(), which searches the rhashtable before the
the rule is removed from it and hence always finds at least 1 entry.
Fix by removing the rule from rhashtable first before calling
cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy() and hence avoid fetching stale info.

Fixes: db43b30cd8 ("cxgb4: add ethtool n-tuple filter deletion")
Signed-off-by: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Rahul Lakkireddy 2021-06-02 19:38:59 +05:30 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 8067da9049
commit 1dcf3d435b

View file

@ -997,20 +997,16 @@ int cxgb4_tc_flower_destroy(struct net_device *dev,
if (!ch_flower)
return -ENOENT;
rhashtable_remove_fast(&adap->flower_tbl, &ch_flower->node,
adap->flower_ht_params);
ret = cxgb4_flow_rule_destroy(dev, ch_flower->fs.tc_prio,
&ch_flower->fs, ch_flower->filter_id);
if (ret)
goto err;
netdev_err(dev, "Flow rule destroy failed for tid: %u, ret: %d",
ch_flower->filter_id, ret);
ret = rhashtable_remove_fast(&adap->flower_tbl, &ch_flower->node,
adap->flower_ht_params);
if (ret) {
netdev_err(dev, "Flow remove from rhashtable failed");
goto err;
}
kfree_rcu(ch_flower, rcu);
err:
return ret;
}