mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-09-04 18:09:57 +00:00
edac: Fix the dimm filling for csrows-based layouts
The driver is currently filling data in a wrong way, on drivers for csrows-based memory controller, when the first layer is a csrow. This is not easily to notice, as, in general, memories are filed in dual, interleaved, symetric mode, as very few memory controllers support asymetric modes. While digging into a bug for i82795_edac driver, the asymetric mode there is now working, allowing us to fill the machine with 4x1GB ranks at channel 0, and 2x512GB at channel 1: Channel 0 ranks: EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A0: from page 0x00000000 to 0x0003ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A1: from page 0x00040000 to 0x0007ffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A2: from page 0x00080000 to 0x000bffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM A3: from page 0x000c0000 to 0x000fffff (size: 0x00040000 pages) Channel 1 ranks: EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B0: from page 0x00100000 to 0x0011ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages) EDAC DEBUG: i82975x_init_csrows: DIMM B1: from page 0x00120000 to 0x0013ffff (size: 0x00020000 pages) Instead of properly showing the memories as such, before this patch, it shows the memory layout as: +-----------------------------------+ | mc0 | | csrow0 | csrow1 | csrow2 | ----------+-----------------------------------+ channel1: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 512 MB | channel0: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 512 MB | ----------+-----------------------------------+ as if both channels were symetric, grouping the DIMMs on a wrong layout. After this patch, the memory is correctly represented. So, for csrows at layers[0], it shows: +-----------------------------------------------+ | mc0 | | csrow0 | csrow1 | csrow2 | csrow3 | ----------+-----------------------------------------------+ channel1: | 512 MB | 512 MB | 0 MB | 0 MB | channel0: | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | 1024 MB | ----------+-----------------------------------------------+ For csrows at layers[1], it shows: +-----------------------+ | mc0 | | channel0 | channel1 | --------+-----------------------+ csrow3: | 1024 MB | 0 MB | csrow2: | 1024 MB | 0 MB | --------+-----------------------+ csrow1: | 1024 MB | 512 MB | csrow0: | 1024 MB | 512 MB | --------+-----------------------+ So, no matter of what comes first, the information between channel and csrow will be properly represented. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4796968402
commit
24bef66e74
1 changed files with 11 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -416,10 +416,18 @@ struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_alloc(unsigned mc_num,
|
|||
dimm->cschannel = chn;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Increment csrow location */
|
||||
row++;
|
||||
if (row == tot_csrows) {
|
||||
row = 0;
|
||||
if (layers[0].is_virt_csrow) {
|
||||
chn++;
|
||||
if (chn == tot_channels) {
|
||||
chn = 0;
|
||||
row++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
row++;
|
||||
if (row == tot_csrows) {
|
||||
row = 0;
|
||||
chn++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Increment dimm location */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue