drm/amd/amdgpu: Fix incorrect logic to increment VCN doorbell index

- The original logic uses a counter based index assignment,
  which is incorrect if we only assign VCN1 to this VF but no VCN0

  The doorbell index is absolute, so we can calculate it by
  using index variable i and j

Signed-off-by: Bokun Zhang <Bokun.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Monk Liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
Bokun Zhang 2020-11-09 13:59:27 -05:00 committed by Alex Deucher
parent 880af2eaed
commit 25a35065c0

View file

@ -155,6 +155,13 @@ static int vcn_v3_0_sw_init(void *handle)
if (r)
return r;
/*
* Note: doorbell assignment is fixed for SRIOV multiple VCN engines
* Formula:
* vcn_db_base = adev->doorbell_index.vcn.vcn_ring0_1 << 1;
* dec_ring_i = vcn_db_base + i * (adev->vcn.num_enc_rings + 1)
* enc_ring_i,j = vcn_db_base + i * (adev->vcn.num_enc_rings + 1) + 1 + j
*/
if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
vcn_doorbell_index = adev->doorbell_index.vcn.vcn_ring0_1;
/* get DWORD offset */
@ -192,9 +199,7 @@ static int vcn_v3_0_sw_init(void *handle)
ring = &adev->vcn.inst[i].ring_dec;
ring->use_doorbell = true;
if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
ring->doorbell_index = vcn_doorbell_index;
/* NOTE: increment so next VCN engine use next DOORBELL DWORD */
vcn_doorbell_index++;
ring->doorbell_index = vcn_doorbell_index + i * (adev->vcn.num_enc_rings + 1);
} else {
ring->doorbell_index = (adev->doorbell_index.vcn.vcn_ring0_1 << 1) + 8 * i;
}
@ -216,9 +221,7 @@ static int vcn_v3_0_sw_init(void *handle)
ring = &adev->vcn.inst[i].ring_enc[j];
ring->use_doorbell = true;
if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev)) {
ring->doorbell_index = vcn_doorbell_index;
/* NOTE: increment so next VCN engine use next DOORBELL DWORD */
vcn_doorbell_index++;
ring->doorbell_index = vcn_doorbell_index + i * (adev->vcn.num_enc_rings + 1) + 1 + j;
} else {
ring->doorbell_index = (adev->doorbell_index.vcn.vcn_ring0_1 << 1) + 2 + j + 8 * i;
}