drm/i915: Add might_sleep() check to wait_for()

We should long past the time of trying to use wait_for() from inside
atomic contexts, so add a might_sleep() check to prevent misuse.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171114215655.4849-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Chris Wilson 2017-11-14 21:56:55 +00:00
parent 55bd6bd757
commit 290b20a6d3

View file

@ -47,14 +47,11 @@
* contexts. Note that it's important that we check the condition again after
* having timed out, since the timeout could be due to preemption or similar and
* we've never had a chance to check the condition before the timeout.
*
* TODO: When modesetting has fully transitioned to atomic, the below
* drm_can_sleep() can be removed and in_atomic()/!in_atomic() asserts
* added.
*/
#define _wait_for(COND, US, W) ({ \
unsigned long timeout__ = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(US) + 1; \
int ret__; \
might_sleep(); \
for (;;) { \
bool expired__ = time_after(jiffies, timeout__); \
if (COND) { \
@ -65,11 +62,7 @@
ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT; \
break; \
} \
if ((W) && drm_can_sleep()) { \
usleep_range((W), (W)*2); \
} else { \
cpu_relax(); \
} \
usleep_range((W), (W) * 2); \
} \
ret__; \
})