drbd: drop wrong debugging aid

The textual representation of resync extents in /proc/drbd presented
with proc_details >= 3 was wrong, it used bitnumbers as bitmasks.

It was not particularly useful either, and I doubt anyone has even tried
to look at it in the last few years. Drop it.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
This commit is contained in:
Lars Ellenberg 2014-02-27 00:02:21 +01:00 committed by Philipp Reisner
parent 4dd726f029
commit 3e0c78d346

View file

@ -188,16 +188,6 @@ static void drbd_syncer_progress(struct drbd_device *device, struct seq_file *se
}
}
static void resync_dump_detail(struct seq_file *seq, struct lc_element *e)
{
struct bm_extent *bme = lc_entry(e, struct bm_extent, lce);
seq_printf(seq, "%5d %s %s\n", bme->rs_left,
bme->flags & BME_NO_WRITES ? "NO_WRITES" : "---------",
bme->flags & BME_LOCKED ? "LOCKED" : "------"
);
}
static int drbd_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
int i, prev_i = -1;
@ -298,13 +288,6 @@ static int drbd_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
lc_seq_printf_stats(seq, device->act_log);
put_ldev(device);
}
if (proc_details >= 2) {
if (device->resync) {
lc_seq_dump_details(seq, device->resync, "rs_left",
resync_dump_detail);
}
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();