drivers/base/memory: init_memory_block() first parameter is not necessary

The first parameter of init_memory_block() is intended to retrieve the
memory_block initiated. But now, we never use it.

Drop it for now.

Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200623025701.2016-1-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Wei Yang 2020-06-23 10:57:00 +08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 105fbc229b
commit 40ba2cde77

View file

@ -570,8 +570,7 @@ int register_memory(struct memory_block *memory)
return ret;
}
static int init_memory_block(struct memory_block **memory,
unsigned long block_id, unsigned long state)
static int init_memory_block(unsigned long block_id, unsigned long state)
{
struct memory_block *mem;
unsigned long start_pfn;
@ -594,14 +593,12 @@ static int init_memory_block(struct memory_block **memory,
ret = register_memory(mem);
*memory = mem;
return ret;
}
static int add_memory_block(unsigned long base_section_nr)
{
int section_count = 0;
struct memory_block *mem;
unsigned long nr;
for (nr = base_section_nr; nr < base_section_nr + sections_per_block;
@ -611,7 +608,7 @@ static int add_memory_block(unsigned long base_section_nr)
if (section_count == 0)
return 0;
return init_memory_block(&mem, base_memory_block_id(base_section_nr),
return init_memory_block(base_memory_block_id(base_section_nr),
MEM_ONLINE);
}
@ -647,7 +644,7 @@ int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
return -EINVAL;
for (block_id = start_block_id; block_id != end_block_id; block_id++) {
ret = init_memory_block(&mem, block_id, MEM_OFFLINE);
ret = init_memory_block(block_id, MEM_OFFLINE);
if (ret)
break;
}