cnic: Don't take cnic_dev_lock in cnic_alloc_uio_rings()

We are allocating memory with GFP_KERNEL under spinlock.  Since this is
the only call manipulating the cnic_udev_list and it is always under
rtnl_lock, cnic_dev_lock can be safely removed.

Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Michael Chan 2014-06-02 23:08:47 -07:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 20f30c2d5e
commit 437b8a26f9

View file

@ -1039,21 +1039,17 @@ static int cnic_alloc_uio_rings(struct cnic_dev *dev, int pages)
struct cnic_local *cp = dev->cnic_priv;
struct cnic_uio_dev *udev;
read_lock(&cnic_dev_lock);
list_for_each_entry(udev, &cnic_udev_list, list) {
if (udev->pdev == dev->pcidev) {
udev->dev = dev;
if (__cnic_alloc_uio_rings(udev, pages)) {
udev->dev = NULL;
read_unlock(&cnic_dev_lock);
return -ENOMEM;
}
cp->udev = udev;
read_unlock(&cnic_dev_lock);
return 0;
}
}
read_unlock(&cnic_dev_lock);
udev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cnic_uio_dev), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!udev)
@ -1067,9 +1063,7 @@ static int cnic_alloc_uio_rings(struct cnic_dev *dev, int pages)
if (__cnic_alloc_uio_rings(udev, pages))
goto err_udev;
write_lock(&cnic_dev_lock);
list_add(&udev->list, &cnic_udev_list);
write_unlock(&cnic_dev_lock);
pci_dev_get(udev->pdev);