From 45c33966759ea1b4040c08dacda99ef623c0ca29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Liu Shixin Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:21:13 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: fix UAF in hugetlb_handle_userfault commit 958f32ce832ba781ac20e11bb2d12a9352ea28fc upstream. The vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex are dropped before handling userfault and reacquire them again after handle_userfault(), but reacquire the vma_lock could lead to UAF[1,2] due to the following race, hugetlb_fault hugetlb_no_page /*unlock vma_lock */ hugetlb_handle_userfault handle_userfault /* unlock mm->mmap_lock*/ vm_mmap_pgoff do_mmap mmap_region munmap_vma_range /* clean old vma */ /* lock vma_lock again <--- UAF */ /* unlock vma_lock */ Since the vma_lock will unlock immediately after hugetlb_handle_userfault(), let's drop the unneeded lock and unlock in hugetlb_handle_userfault() to fix the issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000d5e00a05e834962e@google.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220921014457.1668-1-liuzixian4@huawei.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220923042113.137273-1-liushixin2@huawei.com Fixes: 1a1aad8a9b7b ("userfaultfd: hugetlbfs: add userfaultfd hugetlb hook") Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang Reported-by: syzbot+193f9cee8638750b23cf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: Liu Zixian Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: John Hubbard Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Sidhartha Kumar Cc: [4.14+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/hugetlb.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index c42c76447e10..c57c165bfbbc 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -4337,6 +4337,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm, spinlock_t *ptl; unsigned long haddr = address & huge_page_mask(h); bool new_page = false; + u32 hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, idx); /* * Currently, we are forced to kill the process in the event the @@ -4346,7 +4347,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm, if (is_vma_resv_set(vma, HPAGE_RESV_UNMAPPED)) { pr_warn_ratelimited("PID %d killed due to inadequate hugepage pool\n", current->pid); - return ret; + goto out; } /* @@ -4365,7 +4366,6 @@ retry: * Check for page in userfault range */ if (userfaultfd_missing(vma)) { - u32 hash; struct vm_fault vmf = { .vma = vma, .address = haddr, @@ -4380,17 +4380,14 @@ retry: }; /* - * hugetlb_fault_mutex and i_mmap_rwsem must be - * dropped before handling userfault. Reacquire - * after handling fault to make calling code simpler. + * vma_lock and hugetlb_fault_mutex must be dropped + * before handling userfault. Also mmap_lock will + * be dropped during handling userfault, any vma + * operation should be careful from here. */ - hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, idx); mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]); i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping); - ret = handle_userfault(&vmf, VM_UFFD_MISSING); - i_mmap_lock_read(mapping); - mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]); - goto out; + return handle_userfault(&vmf, VM_UFFD_MISSING); } page = alloc_huge_page(vma, haddr, 0); @@ -4497,6 +4494,8 @@ retry: unlock_page(page); out: + mutex_unlock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]); + i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping); return ret; backout: @@ -4592,10 +4591,12 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]); entry = huge_ptep_get(ptep); - if (huge_pte_none(entry)) { - ret = hugetlb_no_page(mm, vma, mapping, idx, address, ptep, flags); - goto out_mutex; - } + if (huge_pte_none(entry)) + /* + * hugetlb_no_page will drop vma lock and hugetlb fault + * mutex internally, which make us return immediately. + */ + return hugetlb_no_page(mm, vma, mapping, idx, address, ptep, flags); ret = 0;