memblock: ensure there is no overflow in memblock_overlaps_region()

commit 023accf5cd upstream.

There maybe an overflow in memblock_overlaps_region() if it is called with
base and size such that

	base + size > PHYS_ADDR_MAX

Make sure that memblock_overlaps_region() caps the size to prevent such
overflow and remove now duplicated call to memblock_cap_size() from
memblock_is_region_reserved().

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210630071211.21011-1-rppt@kernel.org/
Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <mark-pk.tsai@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mike Rapoport 2021-12-13 16:57:08 +08:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent bdca964781
commit 492f4d3cde
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
{
unsigned long i;
memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
for (i = 0; i < type->cnt; i++)
if (memblock_addrs_overlap(base, size, type->regions[i].base,
type->regions[i].size))
@ -1760,7 +1762,6 @@ bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t siz
*/
bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_reserved(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
{
memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
return memblock_overlaps_region(&memblock.reserved, base, size);
}