mirrors/linux-stable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git synced 2024-09-28 05:12:49 +00:00
Code Issues Releases Wiki Activity

for-6.4-rc7-tag

Browse source 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAmSR56sACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDvdORAAk3IVO8V6md56wSQBC0S2itaMomSYlzBJL8fqriKZwhaG6C/pJPyt0wyQ
 zj1ZsJqX3WwhDssVWIYNrj6CLr7gOQiMpbX363PYTFc6Hvrw8FqDVk/VjworsSmC
 IyVo3K11HCLIapbYrB1QLxzufDqYieYw6c2jS1elnwUUssvPHxonlfc2IZ1nef9z
 jLS9ZBbEjO7KaUwKrDJ1g4OFljwSnuYCW41fZWFaoXnvlBk84BbBvcRisFY69a++
 Kv0ux1Z2NJXmBOzKG4ZXCCNamwHj/oHqOT2cZm7ZzWrruIo5IP/Q4lzXHxKkbxA0
 7cUfS+O7UqwBDzZZsBEos6Pn82q1rj9RFQkw8B6gCazwRN16TiA2U3AqOkjPZolL
 RXMhLB1oEpQbyxB/PMhk63yV3uHs7VxVvyycuG9qlynFCRVFNxj4hE4TXFJu97DD
 TBOXmUaCBbyRMX72BycziW4hwsbWafkmZqRWV8wHqRXOD4nd7QCj51ZOFTIsNmbq
 Gpo2cJxmzEeYJC/o4Kq+ABCcmrphMhgALugR8T0TBP9gqp0WVs6NmixTzFEc9Zo6
 VbcN721J7R7yYBknJIUQ5GuJJddhu4Ya86vk/N2eBsGVSq0KxCtJoHbM4RBYTaTl
 NiXcdXu1Cr4TojoZN5W6cH6BBSCvIcEBruQtNkoIj5G0Wfrvt0U=
 =IFO0
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-6.4-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fix from David Sterba:
 "One more regression fix for an assertion failure that uncovered a
  nasty problem with stripe calculations. This is caused by a u32
  overflow when there are enough devices. The fstests require 6 so this
  hasn't been caught, I was able to hit it with 8.

  The fix is minimal and only adds u64 casts, we'll clean that up later.
  I did various additional tests to be sure"

* tag 'for-6.4-rc7-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: fix u32 overflows when left shifting stripe_nr
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2023-06-20 14:38:21 -07:00
commit 4b0c7a1ba0
1 changed files with 7 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

12
fs/btrfs/volumes.c
View file

@ -5975,12 +5975,12 @@ struct btrfs_discard_stripe *btrfs_map_discard(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
stripe_nr = offset >> BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT;
/* stripe_offset is the offset of this block in its stripe */
stripe_offset = offset - (stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT);
stripe_offset = offset - ((u64)stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT);
stripe_nr_end = round_up(offset + length, BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN) >>
BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT;
stripe_cnt = stripe_nr_end - stripe_nr;
stripe_end_offset = (stripe_nr_end << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT) -
stripe_end_offset = ((u64)stripe_nr_end << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT) -
(offset + length);
/*
* after this, stripe_nr is the number of stripes on this
@ -6023,7 +6023,7 @@ struct btrfs_discard_stripe *btrfs_map_discard(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
for (i = 0; i < *num_stripes; i++) {
stripes[i].physical =
map->stripes[stripe_index].physical +
stripe_offset + (stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT);
stripe_offset + ((u64)stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT);
stripes[i].dev = map->stripes[stripe_index].dev;
if (map->type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 |
@ -6196,9 +6196,11 @@ static u64 btrfs_max_io_len(struct map_lookup *map, enum btrfs_map_op op,
* not ensured to be power of 2.
*/
*full_stripe_start =
rounddown(*stripe_nr, nr_data_stripes(map)) <<
(u64)rounddown(*stripe_nr, nr_data_stripes(map)) <<
BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT;
ASSERT(*full_stripe_start + full_stripe_len > offset);
ASSERT(*full_stripe_start <= offset);
/*
* For writes to RAID56, allow to write a full stripe set, but
* no straddling of stripe sets.
@ -6221,7 +6223,7 @@ static void set_io_stripe(struct btrfs_io_stripe *dst, const struct map_lookup *
{
dst->dev = map->stripes[stripe_index].dev;
dst->physical = map->stripes[stripe_index].physical +
stripe_offset + (stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT);
stripe_offset + ((u64)stripe_nr << BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN_SHIFT);
}
int __btrfs_map_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, enum btrfs_map_op op,