tracepoints: Prevent null probe from being added

Somehow tracepoint_entry_add_probe() function allows a null probe function.
And, this may lead to unexpected results since the number of probe
functions in an entry can be counted by checking whether a probe is null
or not in the for-loop.
This patch prevents a null probe from being added.
In tracepoint_entry_remove_probe() function, checking probe parameter
within the for-loop is moved out for code efficiency, leaving the null probe
feature which removes all probe functions in the entry.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1365991995-19445-1-git-send-email-kpark3469@gmail.com

Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Sahara <keun-o.park@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
Sahara 2013-04-15 11:13:15 +09:00 committed by Steven Rostedt
parent d2802d0739
commit 4c69e6ea41
1 changed files with 13 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -112,7 +112,8 @@ tracepoint_entry_add_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry,
int nr_probes = 0;
struct tracepoint_func *old, *new;
WARN_ON(!probe);
if (WARN_ON(!probe))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
debug_print_probes(entry);
old = entry->funcs;
@ -152,13 +153,18 @@ tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry,
debug_print_probes(entry);
/* (N -> M), (N > 1, M >= 0) probes */
for (nr_probes = 0; old[nr_probes].func; nr_probes++) {
if (!probe ||
(old[nr_probes].func == probe &&
old[nr_probes].data == data))
nr_del++;
if (probe) {
for (nr_probes = 0; old[nr_probes].func; nr_probes++) {
if (old[nr_probes].func == probe &&
old[nr_probes].data == data)
nr_del++;
}
}
/*
* If probe is NULL, then nr_probes = nr_del = 0, and then the
* entire entry will be removed.
*/
if (nr_probes - nr_del == 0) {
/* N -> 0, (N > 1) */
entry->funcs = NULL;
@ -173,8 +179,7 @@ tracepoint_entry_remove_probe(struct tracepoint_entry *entry,
if (new == NULL)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
for (i = 0; old[i].func; i++)
if (probe &&
(old[i].func != probe || old[i].data != data))
if (old[i].func != probe || old[i].data != data)
new[j++] = old[i];
new[nr_probes - nr_del].func = NULL;
entry->refcount = nr_probes - nr_del;