From 13fbcee55706db45ce047a7cea14811d68f94ee3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonghong Song Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 09:44:55 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] bpf: Improve verifier JEQ/JNE insn branch taken checking Currently, for BPF_JEQ/BPF_JNE insn, verifier determines whether the branch is taken or not only if both operands are constants. Therefore, for the following code snippet, 0: (85) call bpf_ktime_get_ns#5 ; R0_w=scalar() 1: (a5) if r0 < 0x3 goto pc+2 ; R0_w=scalar(umin=3) 2: (b7) r2 = 2 ; R2_w=2 3: (1d) if r0 == r2 goto pc+2 6 At insn 3, since r0 is not a constant, verifier assumes both branch can be taken which may lead inproper verification failure. Add comparing umin/umax value and the constant. If the umin value is greater than the constant, or umax value is smaller than the constant, for JEQ the branch must be not-taken, and for JNE the branch must be taken. The jmp32 mode JEQ/JNE branch taken checking is also handled similarly. The following lists the veristat result w.r.t. changed number of processes insns during verification: File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- --------------- test_cls_redirect.bpf.linked3.o cls_redirect 64980 73472 +8492 (+13.07%) test_seg6_loop.bpf.linked3.o __add_egr_x 12425 12423 -2 (-0.02%) test_tcp_hdr_options.bpf.linked3.o estab 2634 2558 -76 (-2.89%) test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt.bpf.linked3.o xdp_ingress_v6 1421 1420 -1 (-0.07%) test_parse_tcp_hdr_opt_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o xdp_ingress_v6 1238 1237 -1 (-0.08%) test_tc_dtime.bpf.linked3.o egress_fwdns_prio100 414 411 -3 (-0.72%) Mostly a small improvement but test_cls_redirect.bpf.linked3.o has a 13% regression. I checked with verifier log and found it this is due to pruning. For some JEQ/JNE branches impacted by this patch, one branch is explored and the other has state equivalence and pruned. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406164455.1045294-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 56f569811f70..5c6b90e384a5 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -12651,10 +12651,14 @@ static int is_branch32_taken(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u32 val, u8 opcode) case BPF_JEQ: if (tnum_is_const(subreg)) return !!tnum_equals_const(subreg, val); + else if (val < reg->u32_min_value || val > reg->u32_max_value) + return 0; break; case BPF_JNE: if (tnum_is_const(subreg)) return !tnum_equals_const(subreg, val); + else if (val < reg->u32_min_value || val > reg->u32_max_value) + return 1; break; case BPF_JSET: if ((~subreg.mask & subreg.value) & val) @@ -12724,10 +12728,14 @@ static int is_branch64_taken(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, u64 val, u8 opcode) case BPF_JEQ: if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) return !!tnum_equals_const(reg->var_off, val); + else if (val < reg->umin_value || val > reg->umax_value) + return 0; break; case BPF_JNE: if (tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) return !tnum_equals_const(reg->var_off, val); + else if (val < reg->umin_value || val > reg->umax_value) + return 1; break; case BPF_JSET: if ((~reg->var_off.mask & reg->var_off.value) & val) From aec08d677b4d0adeb7412fa98547cf07bfce6fea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonghong Song Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 09:45:00 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for non-constant cond_op NE/EQ bound deduction Add various tests for code pattern ' NE/EQ ' implemented in the previous verifier patch. Without the verifier patch, these new tests will fail. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406164500.1045715-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 + .../verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 181 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c index efc8cf2e18d0..73dff693d411 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include "verifier_array_access.skel.h" #include "verifier_basic_stack.skel.h" #include "verifier_bounds_deduction.skel.h" +#include "verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.skel.h" #include "verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign.skel.h" #include "verifier_cfg.skel.h" #include "verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode.skel.h" @@ -70,6 +71,7 @@ void test_verifier_and(void) { RUN(verifier_and); } void test_verifier_array_access(void) { RUN(verifier_array_access); } void test_verifier_basic_stack(void) { RUN(verifier_basic_stack); } void test_verifier_bounds_deduction(void) { RUN(verifier_bounds_deduction); } +void test_verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const(void) { RUN(verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const); } void test_verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign(void) { RUN(verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign); } void test_verifier_cfg(void) { RUN(verifier_cfg); } void test_verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode(void) { RUN(verifier_cgroup_inv_retcode); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..fe570d866139 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +#include +#include +#include "bpf_misc.h" + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, == , 1") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_1(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 < 3 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 2; \ + if r0 == r2 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, == , 2") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_2(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 > 3 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 4; \ + if r0 == r2 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, != , 1") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_3(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 < 3 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 2; \ + if r0 != r2 goto l0_%=; \ + goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, != , 2") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_4(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 > 3 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 4; \ + if r0 != r2 goto l0_%=; \ + goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, == , 1") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_5(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 < 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 3; \ + if w0 == w2 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, == , 2") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_6(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 > 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 5; \ + if w0 == w2 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, != , 1") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_7(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 < 3 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 2; \ + if w0 != w2 goto l0_%=; \ + goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, != , 2") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_8(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 > 3 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 4; \ + if w0 != w2 goto l0_%=; \ + goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; From 953d9f5beaf75e88c69a13d70ce424cd606a29f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonghong Song Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 09:45:05 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] bpf: Improve handling of pattern ' ' in verifier Currently, the verifier does not handle ' ' well. For example, ... 10: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -16) ; R1_w=scalar() R10=fp0 11: (b7) r2 = 0 ; R2_w=0 12: (2d) if r2 > r1 goto pc+2 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit 15: (65) if r1 s> 0x1 goto pc+3 16: (0f) r0 += r1 ... At insn 12, verifier decides both true and false branch are possible, but actually only false branch is possible. Currently, the verifier already supports patterns ' . Add support for patterns ' ' in a similar way. Also fix selftest 'verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign/bounds checks mixing signed and unsigned, variant 10' due to this change. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Dave Marchevsky Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406164505.1046801-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ++++++++++++ .../bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 5c6b90e384a5..3660b573048a 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -13356,6 +13356,18 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, src_reg->var_off.value, opcode, is_jmp32); + } else if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && + is_jmp32 && tnum_is_const(tnum_subreg(dst_reg->var_off))) { + pred = is_branch_taken(src_reg, + tnum_subreg(dst_reg->var_off).value, + flip_opcode(opcode), + is_jmp32); + } else if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && + !is_jmp32 && tnum_is_const(dst_reg->var_off)) { + pred = is_branch_taken(src_reg, + dst_reg->var_off.value, + flip_opcode(opcode), + is_jmp32); } else if (reg_is_pkt_pointer_any(dst_reg) && reg_is_pkt_pointer_any(src_reg) && !is_jmp32) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c index 91a66357896a..4f40144748a5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_mix_sign_unsign.c @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ __naked void signed_and_unsigned_variant_10(void) call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \ if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \ r1 = *(u64*)(r10 - 16); \ - r2 = 0; \ + r2 = -1; \ if r2 > r1 goto l1_%=; \ r0 = 0; \ exit; \ From 23a88fae9f20d47bb3aed99b1e08d0d6cf65cf0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonghong Song Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 09:45:10 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for code pattern ' ' Add various tests for code pattern ' ' to exercise the previous verifier patch. The following are veristat changed number of processed insns stat comparing the previous patch vs. this patch: File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) ----------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- --------- --------- ------------- test_seg6_loop.bpf.linked3.o __add_egr_x 12423 12314 -109 (-0.88%) Only one program is affected with minor change. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230406164510.1047757-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- .../verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c | 460 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 460 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c index fe570d866139..823f727cf210 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_bounds_deduction_non_const.c @@ -176,4 +176,464 @@ l1_%=: \ : __clobber_all); } +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, > , 1") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_9(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + r2 = 0; \ + if r2 > r0 goto l0_%=; \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, > , 2") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_10(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 < 4 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 4; \ + if r2 > r0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, >= ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_11(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 < 4 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 3; \ + if r2 >= r0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, < ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_12(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 > 4 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 4; \ + if r2 < r0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, <= ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_13(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 >= 4 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 4; \ + if r2 <= r0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, == ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_14(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 < 3 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 2; \ + if r2 == r0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, s> ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_15(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 s< 4 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 4; \ + if r2 s> r0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, s>= ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_16(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 s< 4 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 3; \ + if r2 s>= r0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, s< ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_17(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 s> 4 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 4; \ + if r2 s< r0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, s<= ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_18(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 s> 4 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 5; \ + if r2 s<= r0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp64, != ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_19(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if r0 < 3 goto l0_%=; \ + r2 = 2; \ + if r2 != r0 goto l0_%=; \ + goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, > , 1") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_20(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + w2 = 0; \ + if w2 > w0 goto l0_%=; \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, > , 2") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_21(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 < 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 4; \ + if w2 > w0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, >= ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_22(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 < 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 3; \ + if w2 >= w0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, < ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_23(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 > 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 4; \ + if w2 < w0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, <= ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_24(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 >= 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 4; \ + if w2 <= w0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, == ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_25(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 < 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 3; \ + if w2 == w0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, s> ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_26(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 s< 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 4; \ + if w2 s> w0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, s>= ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_27(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 s< 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 3; \ + if w2 s>= w0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, s< ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_28(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 s> 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 5; \ + if w2 s< w0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, s<= ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_29(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 s>= 4 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 4; \ + if w2 s<= w0 goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("socket") +__description("check deducing bounds from non-const, jmp32, != ") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void deducing_bounds_from_non_const_30(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \ + if w0 < 3 goto l0_%=; \ + w2 = 2; \ + if w2 != w0 goto l0_%=; \ + goto l1_%=; \ +l0_%=: \ + r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +l1_%=: \ + r0 -= r1; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";