drm/todo: Add entry about dealing with brightness control on devices with > 1 panel

Add an entry summarizing the discussion about dealing with brightness
control on devices with more then 1 internal panel.

The original discussion can be found here:
https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220517152331.16217-1-hdegoede@redhat.com/

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Hans de Goede 2022-07-11 13:49:34 +02:00
parent c2d6920e98
commit 4f96b1bc15

View file

@ -715,6 +715,74 @@ Contact: Sam Ravnborg
Level: Advanced
Brightness handling on devices with multiple internal panels
============================================================
On x86/ACPI devices there can be multiple backlight firmware interfaces:
(ACPI) video, vendor specific and others. As well as direct/native (PWM)
register programming by the KMS driver.
To deal with this backlight drivers used on x86/ACPI call
acpi_video_get_backlight_type() which has heuristics (+quirks) to select
which backlight interface to use; and backlight drivers which do not match
the returned type will not register themselves, so that only one backlight
device gets registered (in a single GPU setup, see below).
At the moment this more or less assumes that there will only
be 1 (internal) panel on a system.
On systems with 2 panels this may be a problem, depending on
what interface acpi_video_get_backlight_type() selects:
1. native: in this case the KMS driver is expected to know which backlight
device belongs to which output so everything should just work.
2. video: this does support controlling multiple backlights, but some work
will need to be done to get the output <-> backlight device mapping
The above assumes both panels will require the same backlight interface type.
Things will break on systems with multiple panels where the 2 panels need
a different type of control. E.g. one panel needs ACPI video backlight control,
where as the other is using native backlight control. Currently in this case
only one of the 2 required backlight devices will get registered, based on
the acpi_video_get_backlight_type() return value.
If this (theoretical) case ever shows up, then supporting this will need some
work. A possible solution here would be to pass a device and connector-name
to acpi_video_get_backlight_type() so that it can deal with this.
Note in a way we already have a case where userspace sees 2 panels,
in dual GPU laptop setups with a mux. On those systems we may see
either 2 native backlight devices; or 2 native backlight devices.
Userspace already has code to deal with this by detecting if the related
panel is active (iow which way the mux between the GPU and the panels
points) and then uses that backlight device. Userspace here very much
assumes a single panel though. It picks only 1 of the 2 backlight devices
and then only uses that one.
Note that all userspace code (that I know off) is currently hardcoded
to assume a single panel.
Before the recent changes to not register multiple (e.g. video + native)
/sys/class/backlight devices for a single panel (on a single GPU laptop),
userspace would see multiple backlight devices all controlling the same
backlight.
To deal with this userspace had to always picks one preferred device under
/sys/class/backlight and will ignore the others. So to support brightness
control on multiple panels userspace will need to be updated too.
There are plans to allow brightness control through the KMS API by adding
a "display brightness" property to drm_connector objects for panels. This
solves a number of issues with the /sys/class/backlight API, including not
being able to map a sysfs backlight device to a specific connector. Any
userspace changes to add support for brightness control on devices with
multiple panels really should build on top of this new KMS property.
Contact: Hans de Goede
Level: Advanced
Outside DRM
===========