Revert "workqueue: Override implicit ordered attribute in workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask()"

commit aac8a59537 upstream.

This reverts commit ca10d851b9.

The commit allowed workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask() to clear __WQ_ORDERED
on now removed implicitly ordered workqueues. This was incorrect in that
system-wide config change shouldn't break ordering properties of all
workqueues. The reason why apply_workqueue_attrs() path was allowed to do so
was because it was targeting the specific workqueue - either the workqueue
had WQ_SYSFS set or the workqueue user specifically tried to change
max_active, both of which indicate that the workqueue doesn't need to be
ordered.

The implicitly ordered workqueue promotion was removed by the previous
commit 3bc1e711c2 ("workqueue: Don't implicitly make UNBOUND workqueues w/
@max_active==1 ordered"). However, it didn't update this path and broke
build. Let's revert the commit which was incorrect in the first place which
also fixes build.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 3bc1e711c2 ("workqueue: Don't implicitly make UNBOUND workqueues w/ @max_active==1 ordered")
Fixes: ca10d851b9 ("workqueue: Override implicit ordered attribute in workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.6+
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo 2024-02-05 15:43:41 -10:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent d767929311
commit 5ad73e1056

View file

@ -5793,13 +5793,9 @@ static int workqueue_apply_unbound_cpumask(const cpumask_var_t unbound_cpumask)
list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
continue;
/* creating multiple pwqs breaks ordering guarantee */
if (!list_empty(&wq->pwqs)) {
if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED_EXPLICIT)
continue;
wq->flags &= ~__WQ_ORDERED;
}
if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED)
continue;
ctx = apply_wqattrs_prepare(wq, wq->unbound_attrs, unbound_cpumask);
if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {