KVM: s390: vsie: add indication for future features

We have certain SIE features that we cannot support for now.
Let's add these features, so user space can directly prepare to enable
them, so we don't have to update yet another component.

In addition, add a comment block, telling why it is for now not possible to
forward/enable these features.

Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
David Hildenbrand 2016-04-13 17:06:50 +02:00 committed by Christian Borntraeger
parent 91473b487d
commit 5d3876a8bf
2 changed files with 22 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_machine {
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_IB 6
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CEI 7
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_IBS 8
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SKEY 9
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CMMA 10
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_PFMFI 11
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIGPIF 12
struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_feat {
__u64 feat[16];
};

View file

@ -281,6 +281,24 @@ static void kvm_s390_cpu_feat_init(void)
allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CEI);
if (sclp.has_ibs)
allow_cpu_feat(KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_IBS);
/*
* KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SKEY: Wrong shadow of PTE.I bits will make
* all skey handling functions read/set the skey from the PGSTE
* instead of the real storage key.
*
* KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CMMA: Wrong shadow of PTE.I bits will make
* pages being detected as preserved although they are resident.
*
* KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_PFMFI: Wrong shadow of PTE.I bits will
* have the same effect as for KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SKEY.
*
* For KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SKEY, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CMMA and
* KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_PFMFI, all PTE.I and PGSTE bits have to be
* correctly shadowed. We can do that for the PGSTE but not for PTE.I.
*
* KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIGPIF: Wrong SCB addresses in the SCA. We
* cannot easily shadow the SCA because of the ipte lock.
*/
}
int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)