scsi: target: Fix multiple LUN_RESET handling

This fixes a bug where an initiator thinks a LUN_RESET has cleaned up
running commands when it hasn't. The bug was added in commit 51ec502a32
("target: Delete tmr from list before processing").

The problem occurs when:

 1. We have N I/O cmds running in the target layer spread over 2 sessions.

 2. The initiator sends a LUN_RESET for each session.

 3. session1's LUN_RESET loops over all the running commands from both
    sessions and moves them to its local drain_task_list.

 4. session2's LUN_RESET does not see the LUN_RESET from session1 because
    the commit above has it remove itself. session2 also does not see any
    commands since the other reset moved them off the state lists.

 5. sessions2's LUN_RESET will then complete with a successful response.

 6. sessions2's inititor believes the running commands on its session are
    now cleaned up due to the successful response and cleans up the running
    commands from its side. It then restarts them.

 7. The commands do eventually complete on the backend and the target
    starts to return aborted task statuses for them. The initiator will
    either throw a invalid ITT error or might accidentally lookup a new
    task if the ITT has been reallocated already.

Fix the bug by reverting the patch, and serialize the execution of
LUN_RESETs and Preempt and Aborts.

Also prevent us from waiting on LUN_RESETs in core_tmr_drain_tmr_list,
because it turns out the original patch fixed a bug that was not
mentioned. For LUN_RESET1 core_tmr_drain_tmr_list can see a second
LUN_RESET and wait on it. Then the second reset will run
core_tmr_drain_tmr_list and see the first reset and wait on it resulting in
a deadlock.

Fixes: 51ec502a32 ("target: Delete tmr from list before processing")
Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230319015620.96006-8-michael.christie@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mike Christie 2023-03-18 20:56:18 -05:00 committed by Martin K. Petersen
parent d8990b5a4d
commit 673db054d7
3 changed files with 25 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -782,6 +782,7 @@ struct se_device *target_alloc_device(struct se_hba *hba, const char *name)
spin_lock_init(&dev->t10_alua.lba_map_lock);
INIT_WORK(&dev->delayed_cmd_work, target_do_delayed_work);
mutex_init(&dev->lun_reset_mutex);
dev->t10_wwn.t10_dev = dev;
/*

View File

@ -188,14 +188,23 @@ static void core_tmr_drain_tmr_list(
* LUN_RESET tmr..
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->se_tmr_lock, flags);
if (tmr)
list_del_init(&tmr->tmr_list);
list_for_each_entry_safe(tmr_p, tmr_pp, &dev->dev_tmr_list, tmr_list) {
if (tmr_p == tmr)
continue;
cmd = tmr_p->task_cmd;
if (!cmd) {
pr_err("Unable to locate struct se_cmd for TMR\n");
continue;
}
/*
* We only execute one LUN_RESET at a time so we can't wait
* on them below.
*/
if (tmr_p->function == TMR_LUN_RESET)
continue;
/*
* If this function was called with a valid pr_res_key
* parameter (eg: for PROUT PREEMPT_AND_ABORT service action
@ -379,14 +388,25 @@ int core_tmr_lun_reset(
tmr_nacl->initiatorname);
}
}
/*
* We only allow one reset or preempt and abort to execute at a time
* to prevent one call from claiming all the cmds causing a second
* call from returning while cmds it should have waited on are still
* running.
*/
mutex_lock(&dev->lun_reset_mutex);
pr_debug("LUN_RESET: %s starting for [%s], tas: %d\n",
(preempt_and_abort_list) ? "Preempt" : "TMR",
dev->transport->name, tas);
core_tmr_drain_tmr_list(dev, tmr, preempt_and_abort_list);
core_tmr_drain_state_list(dev, prout_cmd, tmr_sess, tas,
preempt_and_abort_list);
mutex_unlock(&dev->lun_reset_mutex);
/*
* Clear any legacy SPC-2 reservation when called during
* LOGICAL UNIT RESET

View File

@ -872,6 +872,7 @@ struct se_device {
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
int queue_cnt;
struct se_device_queue *queues;
struct mutex lun_reset_mutex;
};
struct target_opcode_descriptor {