mm: workingset: make shadow_lru_isolate() use locking suffix

shadow_lru_isolate() disables interrupts and acquires a lock.  It could
use spin_lock_irq() instead.  It also uses local_irq_enable() while it
could use spin_unlock_irq()/xa_unlock_irq().

Use proper suffix for lock/unlock in order to enable/disable interrupts
during release/acquire of a lock.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180622151221.28167-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2018-08-17 15:46:08 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent ae1e16da14
commit 6ca342d020
1 changed files with 3 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static enum lru_status shadow_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item,
/* Coming from the list, invert the lock order */
if (!xa_trylock(&mapping->i_pages)) {
spin_unlock(lru_lock);
spin_unlock_irq(lru_lock);
ret = LRU_RETRY;
goto out;
}
@ -469,13 +469,11 @@ static enum lru_status shadow_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item,
workingset_lookup_update(mapping));
out_invalid:
xa_unlock(&mapping->i_pages);
xa_unlock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
ret = LRU_REMOVED_RETRY;
out:
local_irq_enable();
cond_resched();
local_irq_disable();
spin_lock(lru_lock);
spin_lock_irq(lru_lock);
return ret;
}