From 7496b59f588dd52886fdbac7633608097543a0a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 21:02:10 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Fix socket waits for write buffer space The socket layer requires that we use the socket lock to protect changes to the sock->sk_write_pending field and others. Reported-by: Chuck Lever Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c index d2bf3b49dbf4..68eee352d69a 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c @@ -764,12 +764,12 @@ xs_stream_start_connect(struct sock_xprt *transport) /** * xs_nospace - handle transmit was incomplete * @req: pointer to RPC request + * @transport: pointer to struct sock_xprt * */ -static int xs_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req) +static int xs_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req, struct sock_xprt *transport) { - struct rpc_xprt *xprt = req->rq_xprt; - struct sock_xprt *transport = container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt); + struct rpc_xprt *xprt = &transport->xprt; struct sock *sk = transport->inet; int ret = -EAGAIN; @@ -780,16 +780,6 @@ static int xs_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req) /* Don't race with disconnect */ if (xprt_connected(xprt)) { - /* wait for more buffer space */ - sk->sk_write_pending++; - xprt_wait_for_buffer_space(xprt); - } else - ret = -ENOTCONN; - - spin_unlock(&xprt->transport_lock); - - /* Race breaker in case memory is freed before above code is called */ - if (ret == -EAGAIN) { struct socket_wq *wq; rcu_read_lock(); @@ -797,8 +787,42 @@ static int xs_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req) set_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &wq->flags); rcu_read_unlock(); - sk->sk_write_space(sk); - } + /* wait for more buffer space */ + set_bit(SOCK_NOSPACE, &sk->sk_socket->flags); + sk->sk_write_pending++; + xprt_wait_for_buffer_space(xprt); + } else + ret = -ENOTCONN; + + spin_unlock(&xprt->transport_lock); + return ret; +} + +static int xs_sock_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req) +{ + struct sock_xprt *transport = + container_of(req->rq_xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt); + struct sock *sk = transport->inet; + int ret = -EAGAIN; + + lock_sock(sk); + if (!sock_writeable(sk)) + ret = xs_nospace(req, transport); + release_sock(sk); + return ret; +} + +static int xs_stream_nospace(struct rpc_rqst *req) +{ + struct sock_xprt *transport = + container_of(req->rq_xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt); + struct sock *sk = transport->inet; + int ret = -EAGAIN; + + lock_sock(sk); + if (!sk_stream_memory_free(sk)) + ret = xs_nospace(req, transport); + release_sock(sk); return ret; } @@ -888,7 +912,7 @@ static int xs_local_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req) case -ENOBUFS: break; case -EAGAIN: - status = xs_nospace(req); + status = xs_stream_nospace(req); break; default: dprintk("RPC: sendmsg returned unrecognized error %d\n", @@ -964,7 +988,7 @@ process_status: /* Should we call xs_close() here? */ break; case -EAGAIN: - status = xs_nospace(req); + status = xs_sock_nospace(req); break; case -ENETUNREACH: case -ENOBUFS: @@ -1086,7 +1110,7 @@ static int xs_tcp_send_request(struct rpc_rqst *req) /* Should we call xs_close() here? */ break; case -EAGAIN: - status = xs_nospace(req); + status = xs_stream_nospace(req); break; case -ECONNRESET: case -ECONNREFUSED: