[IA64] Take defensive stance on ia64_pal_get_brand_info()

Stephane thought he saw a problem here (but was just confused
by the return value from ia64_pal_get_brand_info()).  But we
should be more defensive here in case an prototype PAL for
a future processor doesn't implement this PAL call.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tony Luck 2006-12-12 11:56:36 -08:00
parent a460ef8d0a
commit 75f6a1de41

View file

@ -674,6 +674,7 @@ get_model_name(__u8 family, __u8 model)
{
char brand[128];
memcpy(brand, "Unknown", 8);
if (ia64_pal_get_brand_info(brand)) {
if (family == 0x7)
memcpy(brand, "Merced", 7);
@ -681,8 +682,7 @@ get_model_name(__u8 family, __u8 model)
case 0: memcpy(brand, "McKinley", 9); break;
case 1: memcpy(brand, "Madison", 8); break;
case 2: memcpy(brand, "Madison up to 9M cache", 23); break;
} else
memcpy(brand, "Unknown", 8);
}
}
if (brandname[0] == '\0')
return strcpy(brandname, brand);