oprofile: Fix p6 counter overflow check

Fix the counter overflow check for CPUs with counter width > 32

I had a similar change in a different patch that I didn't submit
and I didn't notice the problem earlier because it was always
tested together.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andi Kleen 2008-11-07 14:02:49 +01:00 committed by Robert Richter
parent 99219b4f3e
commit 7c64ade53a

View file

@ -27,8 +27,7 @@ static int num_counters = 2;
static int counter_width = 32;
#define CTR_IS_RESERVED(msrs, c) (msrs->counters[(c)].addr ? 1 : 0)
#define CTR_READ(l, h, msrs, c) do {rdmsr(msrs->counters[(c)].addr, (l), (h)); } while (0)
#define CTR_OVERFLOWED(n) (!((n) & (1U<<(counter_width-1))))
#define CTR_OVERFLOWED(n) (!((n) & (1ULL<<(counter_width-1))))
#define CTRL_IS_RESERVED(msrs, c) (msrs->controls[(c)].addr ? 1 : 0)
#define CTRL_READ(l, h, msrs, c) do {rdmsr((msrs->controls[(c)].addr), (l), (h)); } while (0)
@ -124,14 +123,14 @@ static void ppro_setup_ctrs(struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
static int ppro_check_ctrs(struct pt_regs * const regs,
struct op_msrs const * const msrs)
{
unsigned int low, high;
u64 val;
int i;
for (i = 0 ; i < num_counters; ++i) {
if (!reset_value[i])
continue;
CTR_READ(low, high, msrs, i);
if (CTR_OVERFLOWED(low)) {
rdmsrl(msrs->counters[i].addr, val);
if (CTR_OVERFLOWED(val)) {
oprofile_add_sample(regs, i);
wrmsrl(msrs->counters[i].addr, -reset_value[i]);
}