btrfs: move page locking from lock_extent_buffer_for_io to write_one_eb

Locking the pages in lock_extent_buffer_for_io only for the non-subpage
case is very confusing.  Move it to write_one_eb to mirror the subpage
case and simplify the code. Now lock_extent_buffer_for_io does not leave
all the pages locked and each is individually locked/unlocked in
write_one_eb.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Christoph Hellwig 2023-05-03 17:24:32 +02:00 committed by David Sterba
parent 50b21d7a06
commit 81a79b6ae4
1 changed files with 1 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@ -1636,7 +1636,6 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool lock_extent_buffer_for_io(struct extent_buffer *e
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = eb->fs_info;
bool ret = false;
int i;
btrfs_tree_lock(eb);
while (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITEBACK, &eb->bflags)) {
@ -1664,20 +1663,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack bool lock_extent_buffer_for_io(struct extent_buffer *e
} else {
spin_unlock(&eb->refs_lock);
}
btrfs_tree_unlock(eb);
/*
* Either we don't need to submit any tree block, or we're submitting
* subpage eb.
* Subpage metadata doesn't use page locking at all, so we can skip
* the page locking.
*/
if (!ret || fs_info->nodesize < PAGE_SIZE)
return ret;
for (i = 0; i < num_extent_pages(eb); i++)
lock_page(eb->pages[i]);
return ret;
}
@ -1960,6 +1946,7 @@ static noinline_for_stack void write_one_eb(struct extent_buffer *eb,
for (i = 0; i < num_pages; i++) {
struct page *p = eb->pages[i];
lock_page(p);
clear_page_dirty_for_io(p);
set_page_writeback(p);
submit_extent_page(&bio_ctrl, disk_bytenr, p, PAGE_SIZE, 0);