mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-10-05 00:20:32 +00:00
blok, bfq: do not plug I/O if all queues are weight-raised
[ Upstream commit c8765de0ad
]
To reduce latency for interactive and soft real-time applications, bfq
privileges the bfq_queues containing the I/O of these
applications. These privileged queues, referred-to as weight-raised
queues, get a much higher share of the device throughput
w.r.t. non-privileged queues. To preserve this higher share, the I/O
of any non-weight-raised queue must be plugged whenever a sync
weight-raised queue, while being served, remains temporarily empty. To
attain this goal, bfq simply plugs any I/O (from any queue), if a sync
weight-raised queue remains empty while in service.
Unfortunately, this plugging typically lowers throughput with random
I/O, on devices with internal queueing (because it reduces the filling
level of the internal queues of the device).
This commit addresses this issue by restricting the cases where
plugging is performed: if a sync weight-raised queue remains empty
while in service, then I/O plugging is performed only if some of the
active bfq_queues are *not* weight-raised (which is actually the only
circumstance where plugging is needed to preserve the higher share of
the throughput of weight-raised queues). This restriction proved able
to boost throughput in really many use cases needing only maximum
throughput.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6c9a79651b
commit
89f4d27c1b
1 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -3593,7 +3593,12 @@ static bool bfq_better_to_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
|
|||
* whether bfqq is being weight-raised, because
|
||||
* bfq_symmetric_scenario() does not take into account also
|
||||
* weight-raised queues (see comments on
|
||||
* bfq_weights_tree_add()).
|
||||
* bfq_weights_tree_add()). In particular, if bfqq is being
|
||||
* weight-raised, it is important to idle only if there are
|
||||
* other, non-weight-raised queues that may steal throughput
|
||||
* to bfqq. Actually, we should be even more precise, and
|
||||
* differentiate between interactive weight raising and
|
||||
* soft real-time weight raising.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* As a side note, it is worth considering that the above
|
||||
* device-idling countermeasures may however fail in the
|
||||
|
@ -3605,7 +3610,8 @@ static bool bfq_better_to_idle(struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
|
|||
* to let requests be served in the desired order until all
|
||||
* the requests already queued in the device have been served.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
asymmetric_scenario = bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 ||
|
||||
asymmetric_scenario = (bfqq->wr_coeff > 1 &&
|
||||
bfqd->wr_busy_queues < bfqd->busy_queues) ||
|
||||
!bfq_symmetric_scenario(bfqd);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue