wimax: usb-tx: mark expected switch fall-through

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I placed the "fall through"
annotation at the bottom of the case, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115075 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Gustavo A. R. Silva 2018-08-09 10:47:20 -05:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 849063074a
commit 8a8a894ebb

View file

@ -131,12 +131,12 @@ int i2400mu_tx(struct i2400mu *i2400mu, struct i2400m_msg_hdr *tx_msg,
dev_err(dev, "BM-CMD: too many stalls in "
"URB; resetting device\n");
usb_queue_reset_device(i2400mu->usb_iface);
/* fallthrough */
} else {
usb_clear_halt(i2400mu->usb_dev, usb_pipe);
msleep(10); /* give the device some time */
goto retry;
}
/* fall through */
case -EINVAL: /* while removing driver */
case -ENODEV: /* dev disconnect ... */
case -ENOENT: /* just ignore it */