mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-09-24 11:25:43 +00:00
libbpf: mark bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy} as __weak
Mark bpf_iter_num_{new,next,destroy}() kfuncs declared for bpf_for()/bpf_repeat() macros as __weak to allow users to feature-detect their presence and guard bpf_for()/bpf_repeat() loops accordingly for backwards compatibility with old kernels. Now that libbpf supports kfunc calls poisoning and better reporting of unresolved (but called) kfuncs, declaring number iterator kfuncs in bpf_helpers.h won't degrade user experience and won't cause unnecessary kernel feature dependencies. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-7-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c5e6474167
commit
94dccba795
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -293,9 +293,9 @@ enum libbpf_tristate {
|
|||
|
||||
struct bpf_iter_num;
|
||||
|
||||
extern int bpf_iter_num_new(struct bpf_iter_num *it, int start, int end) __ksym;
|
||||
extern int *bpf_iter_num_next(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __ksym;
|
||||
extern void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __ksym;
|
||||
extern int bpf_iter_num_new(struct bpf_iter_num *it, int start, int end) __weak __ksym;
|
||||
extern int *bpf_iter_num_next(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __weak __ksym;
|
||||
extern void bpf_iter_num_destroy(struct bpf_iter_num *it) __weak __ksym;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef bpf_for_each
|
||||
/* bpf_for_each(iter_type, cur_elem, args...) provides generic construct for
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue