mm: memory-failure: move sysctl register in memory_failure_init()

There is already a memory_failure_init(), don't add a new initcall, move
register_sysctl_init() into it to cleanup a bit.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230508114128.37081-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Kefeng Wang 2023-05-08 19:41:28 +08:00 committed by Andrew Morton
parent 870388db25
commit 97de10a993
1 changed files with 2 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ const struct attribute_group memory_failure_attr_group = {
.attrs = memory_failure_attr,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
static struct ctl_table memory_failure_table[] = {
{
.procname = "memory_failure_early_kill",
@ -146,14 +145,6 @@ static struct ctl_table memory_failure_table[] = {
{ }
};
static int __init memory_failure_sysctl_init(void)
{
register_sysctl_init("vm", memory_failure_table);
return 0;
}
late_initcall(memory_failure_sysctl_init);
#endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
/*
* Return values:
* 1: the page is dissolved (if needed) and taken off from buddy,
@ -2441,6 +2432,8 @@ static int __init memory_failure_init(void)
INIT_WORK(&mf_cpu->work, memory_failure_work_func);
}
register_sysctl_init("vm", memory_failure_table);
return 0;
}
core_initcall(memory_failure_init);