net/mlx5: Add missing RDMA_RX capabilities

New flow table type RDMA_RX was added but the MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE
didn't handle this new flow table type.
This means that MLX5_CAP_FLOW_TABLE_TYPE returns an empty capability to
this flow table type.

Update both the macro and the maximum supported flow table type to
RDMA_RX.

Fixes: d83eb50e29 ("net/mlx5: Add support in RDMA RX steering")
Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Maor Gottlieb 2019-07-14 11:33:07 +03:00 committed by Saeed Mahameed
parent 08aa5e7da6
commit 987f6c69dd

View file

@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum fs_flow_table_type {
FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX = 0X5,
FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX = 0X6,
FS_FT_RDMA_RX = 0X7,
FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX,
FS_FT_MAX_TYPE = FS_FT_RDMA_RX,
};
enum fs_flow_table_op_mod {
@ -275,7 +275,8 @@ void mlx5_cleanup_fs(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev);
(type == FS_FT_FDB) ? MLX5_CAP_ESW_FLOWTABLE_FDB(mdev, cap) : \
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_RX(mdev, cap) : \
(type == FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_SNIFFER_TX(mdev, cap) : \
(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_SNIFFER_TX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\
(type == FS_FT_RDMA_RX) ? MLX5_CAP_FLOWTABLE_RDMA_RX(mdev, cap) : \
(BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(FS_FT_RDMA_RX != FS_FT_MAX_TYPE))\
)
#endif