cpufreq: Drop unnecessary cpus locking from store()

This change was introduced long back by commit 4f750c9308 ("cpufreq:
Synchronize the cpufreq store_*() routines with CPU hotplug").

Since then, both cpufreq and hotplug core have been reworked and have
much better locking in place. The race mentioned in commit 4f750c9308
isn't possible anymore.

Drop the unnecessary locking.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Viresh Kumar 2022-05-26 17:21:21 +05:30 committed by Rafael J. Wysocki
parent 336e51283a
commit 9ab9b9d3fb
1 changed files with 4 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -973,21 +973,10 @@ static ssize_t store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
if (!fattr->store)
return -EIO;
/*
* cpus_read_trylock() is used here to work around a circular lock
* dependency problem with respect to the cpufreq_register_driver().
*/
if (!cpus_read_trylock())
return -EBUSY;
if (cpu_online(policy->cpu)) {
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (likely(!policy_is_inactive(policy)))
ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
}
cpus_read_unlock();
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
if (likely(!policy_is_inactive(policy)))
ret = fattr->store(policy, buf, count);
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
return ret;
}